Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors

Journal of Urology

Volumn 170, Issue 2 I, 2003, Pages 389-392

  Sheir, Khaled Z ^a   Madbouly, Khaled ^b   Elsobky, Emad ^b  

^a MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Comparative study; Electromagnetics; Lithotripsy; Urinary calculi

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; LITHOTRIPSY; MACHINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROLITHIASIS;

EID: 0038152785     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000075080.58359.46     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Drach, G. W., Dretler, S., Fair, W., Finlayson, B., Gillenwater, J., Griffith, D. et al: Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 135: 1127, 1986
2. Lingeman, J. E., Newman, D., Mertz, J. H. O., Mosbaugh, P. G., Steele, R. E., Kahnoski, R. J. et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol, 135: 1134, 1986
3. Lingeman, J. E.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Development, instrumentation, and current status. Urol Clin North Am, 24: 185, 1997
4. Chan, S. L., Stothers, L., Rowley, A., Perler, Z., Taylor, W. and Sullivan, L. D.: A prospective trial comparing the efficacy and complications of the modified Dornier HM3 and MFL 5000 lithotriptors for solitary renal calculi. J Urol, 153: 1794, 1995
5. Gnanapragasam, V. J., Ramsden, P. D., Murthy, L. S. and Thomas, D. J.: Primary in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi: results with a third generation lithotriptor. BJU Int, 84: 770, 1999
6. Ehreth, J. T., Drach, G. W., Arnett, M. L., Barnett, R. B., Govan, D., Lingeman, J. et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: multicenter study of kidney and upper ureter versus middle and lower ureter treatments. J Urol, 152: 1379, 1994
7. Lingeman, J. E., Newman, D. M., Siegel, Y. I., Eichhorn, T. and Parr, K.: Shock wave lithotripsy with the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotriptor using an external fixed rate signal. J Urol, 154: 951, 1995
8. Fialkov, J. M., Hedican, S. P. and Fallon, B.: Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol, 164: 640, 2000
9. Fuselier, H. A., Prats, L., Fontenot, C. and Gauthier, A., Jr.: Comparison of mobile lithotripters at one institution: health-tronics lithotron, Dornier MFL-5000, and Dornier Doli. J Endourol, 13: 539, 1999
10. Dornier EMSE 220 shock wave generator system technical data. Dornier Medizintechnik GMBH, Germering (Munich), Germany, 1999
11. Densted, J. D., Clayman, R. V. and Preminger, G. M.: Efficacy quotient as a means of comparing lithotriptors. J Endourol, suppl., 4: 100, 1990
12. Erturk, E.: Editorial comment. J Urol, 164: 643, 2000
13. Logarakis, N. F., Jewett, M. A. S., Luymes, J. and Honey, R. J. D.' A.: Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 163: 721, 2000
14. Taily, G. G.: Consecutive experience with four Dornier lithotripters: HM4, MPL 9000, compact, and U/50. J Endourol, 13: 329, 1999
15. Matin, S. F., Yost, A. and Streem, S. B.: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a comparative study of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic units. J Urol, 166: 2053, 2001