Of global space or perceived place? Comment on Kelly et al

Biology Letters

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 647-648

  Sturz, Bradley R ^a   Bodily, Kent D ^b  

^a Armstrong State University   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053906786     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0216     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Kelly, D. M., Chiandetti, C. & Vallortigara, G. 2010 Re-orienting in space: Do animals use global or local geometry strategies? Biol. Lett. 7, 372-375. (doi:10.1098/ rsbl.2010.1024)
2. Sturz, B. R., Gurley, T. & Bodily, K. D. 2011 Orientation in trapezoid-shaped enclosures: Implications for theoretical accounts of geometry learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. (doi:10.1037/a0021215)
3. Cheng, K. & Newcombe, N. S. 2005 Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 1-23. (doi:10.3758/ BF03196346) (Pubitemid 40900491)
4. Cheng, K. 2005 Reflections on geometry and navigation. Connect. Sci. 17, 5-21. (doi:10.1080/09540090500138077) (Pubitemid 41238121)
5. Gallistel, C. R. 1990 The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Wang, R. F. & Spelke, E. S. 2002 Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 376-382. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02) 01961-7)
7. Shettleworth, S. J. 1988 Foraging as operant behavior and operant behavior as foraging: What have we learned? In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 22 (ed. G. H. Bower), pp. 1-49. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.