Robotics training program: Evaluation of the satisfaction and the factors that influence success of skills training in a resident robotics curriculum

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1669-1674

  Lucas, Steven M ^a   Gilley, David A ^a   Joshi, Shreyas S ^a   Gardner, Thomas A ^a   Sundaram, Chandru P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; ROBOTICS; SKILL; SURGICAL TRAINING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; ROBOTICS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 80053644692     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0713     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001;40:70-74. (Pubitemid 32786124)
2. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III, et al. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS 2008;12:9-12.
3. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, et al. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: An experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:171-174. (Pubitemid 46986131)
4. Narula VK, Watson WC, Davis SS, et al. A computerized analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2258-2261. (Pubitemid 350125954)
5. Obek C, Hubka M, Porter M, et al. Robotic vs conventional laparoscopic skill acquisition: Implications for training. J Endourol 2005;19:1098-1103. (Pubitemid 41691724)
6. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, et al. Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic skills: Is there a difference in the learning curvê Urology 2002;60:39-45. (Pubitemid 34722942)
7. Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: Better and more cost effective than operating room experiencê J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:272-283.
8. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 2004;240:518-528. (Pubitemid 39121346)
9. Korndorffer JR Jr., Dunne JB, Sierra R, et al. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201: 23-29. (Pubitemid 40840560)
10. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: Results of a randomized, double-blinded study.Ann Surg 2002;236:458-464.
11. Stelzer MK, Abdel MP, Sloan MP, Gould JC. Dry lab practice leads to improved laparoscopic performance in the operating room. J Surg Res 2009;154:163-166.
12. Uchal M, Raftopoulos Y, Tjugum J, Bergamaschi R. Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19:109-116. (Pubitemid 40487237)
13. Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Dalinin VV, et al. Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1565-1569. (Pubitemid 44451228)
14. Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C. VR robotic surgery: Randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:242-244.
15. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 2010; 24:467-472.
16. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery training and performance: Identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:96-103. (Pubitemid 43097041)
17. Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, et al. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 2004;18:63-67.
18. Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Mohammadi Y, Sundaram CP. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 2009;23:503-508.
19. Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, et al. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:96-101. (Pubitemid 44960037)
20. Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, et al. Robotics in urologic surgery: An evolving new technology. Int J Urol 2006;13: 857-863. (Pubitemid 44049906)
21. Sachdeva AK. Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: The challenge and the opportunity. Arch Surg 2005;140:387-389. (Pubitemid 40489959)
22. Albani JM, Lee DI. Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol 2007;21:285-287. (Pubitemid 46626535)
23. Korndorffer JR, Jr., Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: Current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 2006;191:17-22. (Pubitemid 43042514)
24. Youngblood PL, Srivastava S, Curet M, et al. Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:546-551. (Pubitemid 40432322)
25. Munz Y, Almoudaris AM,Moorthy K, et al. Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: Objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg 2007;193:774.
26. Lucas SM, Zeltser IS, Bensalah K, et al. Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure. J Urol 2008;180: 2588-2591.
27. Benson AD, Kramer BA, Boehler M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic skills development: Formal vs informal training. J Endourol 2010.
28. Duchene DA, Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, et al. Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. J Urol 2006;176:2158-2167. (Pubitemid 44633156)