Building academic research centers to advance research on violence against women: An empirical foundation

Violence Against Women

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1123-1136

  Jordan, Carol E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

interdisciplinarity; research; research centers; violence against women

Indexed keywords

BATTERED WOMAN; EDITORIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; VIOLENCE; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; BATTERED WOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES; VIOLENCE; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 80053642822     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801211419086     Document Type: Editorial

References (58)

1. Aboelela S.W.,Larson E.,Bakken S.,Carrasquillo O.,Formicola A.,Glied S.A. Gebbie K.M.Health Research and Educational Trust. 2007:329-346.
2. Allen N.E.An examination of the effectiveness of domestic violence coordinating councils.Violence Against Women. 2006;12:46-67.
3. Bachman R.A comparison of annual incidence rates and contextual characteristics of intimate partner violence against women from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS).Violence Against Women. 2000;6:839-867.
4. Basile K.C.Advancing the study of violence against women: Response to Jordan.Violence Against Women. 2009;15:428-433.
5. Block C.,Engel B.,Naureckas S.,Riordan K.The Chicago Women's Health Risk Study: Lessons in collaboration.Violence Against Women. 1999;5:1158-1177.
6. Boardman C.P.,Ponomariov B.L.Journal of Higher Education. 2007:51-70.
7. Bruhn J.G.Interdisciplinary research: A philosophy, art form, artifact or antidote?.Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science. 2000;35:58-66.
8. Butler D.Interdisciplinary research "being stifled.".Nature. 1998;396:201.
9. Campbell R.Science, social change, and ending violence against women: Response to Jordan.Violence Against Women. 2009;15:434-439.
10. Campbell J.,Dienemann J.,Kub J.,Wurmser T.,Loy E.Collaboration as a partnership.Violence Against Women. 1999;5:1140-1157.
11. Campbell R.,Patterson D.,Lichty L.F.The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2005;6:313-329.
12. Corley E.,Gaughan M.Scientists' participation in university research centers: What are the gender differences?.Journal of Technology Transfer. 2005;30:371-381.
13. Crowell N.,Burgess A.Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996:.
14. Daro, D., Edleson, J. L., & Pinderhughes, H. (2004). Finding common ground in the study ofchild maltreatment, youth violence, and adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 282-298
15. Competing in the era of big bets: Achieving scale in multidisciplinary research. Washington, DC: The Advisory Board Company; 2009:.
16. Ford D.The substance, scholarship, and science of research on violence against women: A comment.Violence Against Women. 2009;15:420-424.
17. Frieze, I., Davis, K., & Maiuro, R. (Eds.). (2000). Stalking and obsessive behaviors in everyday life: Assessment of victims and perpetrators: Part 1 [Special issue]. Violence and Victims, 15(4).
18. Frost S.H.,Jean P.M.,Teodorescu D.,Brown A.B.Review of Higher Education. 2004:461-479.
19. Fuqua J.,Stokols D.,Gress J.,Phillips K.,Harvey R.Transdisciplinary scientific collaboration as a basis for enhancing the science and prevention of substance use and abuse.Substance Use and Misuse. 2004;39:1457-1514.
20. Galinsky M.J.,Turnball J.E.,Meglin D.E.,Wilner M.E.Confronting the reality of collaborative practice research: Issues of practice, design, measurement, and team development.Social Work 38; 1993; 1993. 440.
21. Geiger R.L.Journal of Higher Education. 1990:1-19.
22. Gilfus M.,Fineran S.,Cohan D.,Jensen S.,Hartwick L.,Spath R.Research on violence against women: Creating survivor-informed collaborations.Violence Against Women. 1999;5:1194-1212.
23. Gondolf, E. (Ed.). (2004). Transnational and cross-cultural research on family violence: Part 1: Prevalence surveys [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 10(7).
24. Gondolf E.,Yllo K.,Campbell J.Out of darkness: Contemporary research perspectives on family violence. Kaufman G.K.Jasinski J., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997:255-261.
25. Googins B.K.,Rochlin S.A.Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectional partnerships.Business & Society Review. 2000;105:127-144.
26. Heyman, R., & Slep, A. (Eds.). (2001). Risk factors for family violence [Special issue]. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(2-3).
27. John-Steiner V.Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
28. Jordan, C. E. (Ed.). (2004). Toward a national research agenda on violence against women: Part 1 [Special issue]. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(11).
29. Jordan, C. E. (Ed.). (2007). The health implications of violence against women: Untangling the complexities of acute and chronic effects: Part 1 [Special issue]. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(2).
30. Jordan C.E.Advancing the study of violence against women: Evolving research agendas into science.Violence Against Women. 2009a;15:393-419.
31. Jordan C.E.Advancing the study of violence against women: Response to commentaries and next steps.Violence Against Women. 2009b;15:440-442.
32. Jordan C.E.,Campbell R.,Follingstad D.Violence and women's mental health: The impact of physical, sexual and psychological aggression.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2010;6:607-628.
33. Kezar A.J.,Lester J.Organizing higher education for collaboration: A guide for campus leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009:.
34. Klein J.Interdisciplinarity: History, theory & practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press; 1990:.
35. Klein J.T.Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010:.
36. Kruttschnitt C.,McLaughlin B.,Petrie C.Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002:.
37. Lattuca L.R.Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2001:.
38. Laughlin P.,Sigerstad M.H.The research administrator's role in creating a supportive environment for interdisciplinary research.Research Management Review. 1990;4:1-8.
39. Martin S.L.Should the study of violence against women be a science?.Violence Against Women. 2009;15:425-427.
40. Metzgar N.,Zare R.N.Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality.Science. 1999;283:642-643.
41. Mohrman S.,Cohen S.,Mohrman A.Designing team based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 1995:.
42. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005:.
43. Paulus P.B.,Nijstad B.A.Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
44. Qin J.,Lancaster F.W.,Allen B.Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences.Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1997;48:893-916.
45. Repko A.F.Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2008:.
46. Rhoten D.Interdisciplinary research: Trend or transition?.Items and Issues. 2004;5 (6): 6-11.
47. Riger, S. (Ed). (1999). Collaborations in research on violence against women [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 5(10).
48. Robertson I.T.Some factors associated with successful interdisciplinary research.Journal of the Society of Research Administrators. 1981;13:5-16.
49. Rosenbaum, A., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (Eds.). (2006). Special issue on meta-research on violence and victims. Violence and Victims, 21(4).
50. Saltzman L.Definitional and methodological issues related to transnational research on intimate partner violence.Violence Against Women. 2004;19:812-830.
51. Senge P.The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday; 1990:.
52. Stahler G.J.,Tash W.R.Journal of Higher Education. 1994:540-554.
53. Stokols D.Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;38:63-77.
54. Stokols D.,Fuqua J.,Gress J.,Harvey R.,Phillips K.,Baezconde-Garbanati L.Trochim W.Evaluating transdisciplinary science.Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2003;5:21-39.
55. Stokols D.,Harvey R.,Gress J.,Fuqua J.,Phillips K.In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;28:202-213.
56. Tjaden P.,Thoennes N.Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2000:.
57. Williams, L. M., Banyard, V. L., & Aoudeh, N. (Eds.). (2005). Bringing women's voices to the center: Innovative methods in the violence against women research: Part 1 [Special issue]. Violence Against Women, 11(10).
58. Zerhouni E.NIH roadmap.Science. 2003;302:63-72.