Endothelial keratoplasty: The influence of insertion techniques and incision size on donor endothelial survival

Cornea

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-31

  Terry, Mark A ^a,b,c   Saad, Hisham A ^a,d   Shamie, Neda ^a   Chen, Edwin S ^a   Phillips, Paul M ^a   Friend, Daniel J ^b   Holiman, Jeffrey D ^c   Stoeger, Christopher ^c  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Lions Vision Research Laboratory of Oregon   (United States)

^c Lions Eye Bank of Oregon   (United States)

^d TANTA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Adobe Photoshop; Alizarin red S; Cornea; Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty; DSAEK; Endothelial damage; Endothelial keratoplasty; Quantitative assessment; Trypan blue; Vital dye staining

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; CELL DAMAGE; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; DONOR; ENDOTHELIUM KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM LESION; EXCISION; FORCEPS; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOPLASTY; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULL THROUGH OPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE INJURY; ADULT; AGED; CADAVER; CORNEA LIMBUS; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; IATROGENIC DISEASE; IN VITRO STUDY; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; CADAVER; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 62149113708     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318182a4d3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK): history, current state, and future directions [Editorial]. Cornea. 2006;25:873-878.
2. Terry MA. The evolution of lamellar grafting techniques over 25 years. Cornea. 2000;19:611-616.
3. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea. 2001;20:239-243.
4. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:1-34.
5. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK): visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1541-1549.
6. Terry MA, Hoar KL, Wall J, et al. The histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): prevention of dislocation with a laboratory-based surgical solution in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea. 2006;25:926-932.
7. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure and pupillary block. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1179-1186.
8. Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, et al. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:488-496.
9. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25:886-889.
10. Price FW, Price MO. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and technique to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:411-418.
11. Nieuwendaal CP, Lapid-Gortzak R, Van der Meulen IJ, et al. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty using descemetorhexis and organ cultured donor corneal tissue (Melles technique). Cornea. 2006;25:933-936.
12. Fang JP, Hamill MB. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty under topical anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:187-188.
13. Covert DJ, Koenig SB. New triple procedure: Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1272-1277.
14. Koenig SB, Covert DJ. Early results of small-incision Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:221-226.
15. Mearza AA, Qureshi MA, Rostron CK. Experience and 12-month results of Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small-incision technique. Cornea. 2007;26:279-283.
16. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Preliminary clinical results of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 [Epub ahead of print].
17. Kuo AN, Harvey TM, Afshari NA. Novel delivery method to reduce endothelial injury in Descemet stripping automated endothelial kerato-plasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:91-96.
18. Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, et al. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1846-1850.
19. Busin M, Bhatt PR. Late detachment of donor graft after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:159-160.
20. Vajpayee RB, Agarwal T, Jhanji V, et al. Modification in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: ''Hitch suture'' technique. Cornea. 2006;25:1060-1062.
21. Macsai MS, Kara-Jose AC. Suture technique for Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26:1123-1126.
22. Ide T, Yoo SH, Goldman JM, et al. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of inserting forceps on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using an in vitro delivery model and vital dye assay. Cornea. 2007;26:1079-1081.
23. Terry MA, Ousley PJ, Zjhra ML. Hydration changes in cadaver eyes prepared for practice and experimental surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:538-543.
24. Ousley PJ, Terry MA. Hydration effects on corneal topography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:181-185.
25. Saad HA, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. An easy and inexpensive method for quantitative analysis of endothelial damage using vital dye staining and Adobe Photoshop software. Cornea. 2008;27:818-824.
26. Koenig SB, Covert DJ, Dupps WJ, et al. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea. 2007;26:670-674.
27. Chen ES, Terry MA, Shamie N, et al. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: six months results in a large, prospective study. Cornea. 2008;25:514-520.
28. Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: influencing factors and 2 year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:857-865.
29. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1855-1865.
30. Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Simultaneous versus sequential penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery. Cornea. 2006;25:1020-1025.
31. Terry MA, Wall JM, Hoar KL, et al. A prospective study of endothelial cell loss during the 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:631-639.
32. McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF, Lynn MJ. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea. 2008; 27:1-16.
33. Melles GRJ, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25:987-990.
34. Shamie N, Chen ES, Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: redefining the surgical therapy of endothelial dysfunction. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2006;1:31-39.
35. Long DA, Monica ML. A prospective evaluation of corneal curvature changes with 3.0 to 3.5 mm corneal tunnel phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:226-232.
36. Rainer G, Menapace R, Vass C, et al. Corneal shape changes after temporal and superolateral 3.0 mm clear corneal incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1121-1126.
37. Barry JS, Spiteri A, Habib NE. Traumatic wound dehiscence of old extracapsular cataract extraction incision after endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27:127.
38. Terry MA. Trauma and wound rupture in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27:127-128.
39. Mehta JS, Thomas AS, Tan DT. Endothelial keratoplasty: requirements of an insertion device. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:420.
40. Terry MA. Donor tissue damage in endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:420-421.