Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Medial pain and functional outcome in the medium term

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Edmondson, Mark C ^a   Isaac, David ^a   Wijeratna, Malin ^a   Brink, Sean ^a   Gibb, Paul ^a   Skinner, Paul ^a  

^a KENT AND SUSSEX HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80053609837     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1749799X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-6-52     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ: The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten year survival study. Journal of Bone and Joint surgery (B) 1998, 80(6):983-9
2. Keys GW, Ul-Abbiddin Z, Toh EM: Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district general hospital in UK. Knee 2004, 11(5):375-7
3. Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty 2-12 year results in a community hospital. Journal of Bone and Joint surgery (B) 2004, 86(7):983-5
4. Svard UC, Price AJ: Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. Journal of Bone and Joint surgery (B) 2001, 83(2):191-4
5. Verdonk R, Cottenie D, Almqvist KF, Vorlat P: The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 2-14 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthros 2005, 13:163-166
6. Newman J, Pydissiti R, Ackroyd C: Unicompartmental or total knee replacement. The 15 year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2009, 91-B(1):52-57
7. Volpin G, Schachar R, Shtarkjer H: Functional outcome after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2006, 88-B(SUPP_II):335
8. Van Isacker T, Cottenie D, Vorlat P, Verdonk R: The oxford unicompartmental knee replacement an independent 10 year follow up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2004, 86-B(SUPP_III):290
9. Cottenie Dominique, Vorlat P, Byn P, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R: The oxford unicompartmental knee replacement a 2-14 year follow up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2004, 86-B(SUPP_III):308
10. Kim KT, Lee S, Park H, Cho K, Kim K: A Prospective Analysis of Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007, 30(5):15-18
11. Oxford Unicompartmental knee replacement. Biomet Surgical technique manual [http://www.oxfordpartialknee.net/userfiles/files/Knees/Oxford/ FLK089 Oxford Knee Surgical Technique(screen res).pdf], Appendix pp34-35
12. Chana R, Shenava Y, Nicholl A, Lusted F, Skinner P, Gibb P: Five to 8 year results of the uncemented Duracon total knee arthroplasty system. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2008, 23(5):677-682
13. White SH, Goodfellow JW, O'connor JJ: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 1991, 73-8: 582-86
14. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A: Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery (Br) 1998, 80(1):63-9
15. Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988, ISBN 0-8058-0283-5
16. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Greisamer RP: The Oxford Unicompartmental, Arthroplasty-a ten year survival study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 1998, 80-B: 983-9
17. Palacious BF, Montes SF: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with an Oxford prosthesis. Acta Ortop Mex 2007, 21(2):49-54
18. Robertson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L: The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee implant. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2001, 83B: 45-9
19. Emerson RH Jr, Hansborough T, Reitman RD, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins LL: Comparison of mobile and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clinical Orthopaedics 2002, 404:62-70
20. The KAT trial group: The knee arthroplasty trial Design features, Baseline characteristics and two year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91:134-141
21. Gulati A, Chua R, Simpson DJ, Dodd CAF, Murray DW: Influence of component alignment on Unicompartmental Knee replacement. The Knee 2009, 16(3):196-199
22. Murray D, Simpson D, Dodd C, Gill H, Beard D, Pandit H, Chau R: An acceptable limit of tibial component overhang in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. British Association for Surgery of the Knee, free paper session 'Technical aspects of UKA', Bournemouth 2008
23. Gleeson RE, Evans R, Ackroyd CE, Webb J, Newman J: Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. The Knee 2004, 11:379-384
24. Murray D: Mobile bearing Unicompartmental knee replacement. Orthopaedics 2005, 28(9):985-87
25. Kasodekar VB, Yeo SJ, Othman S: Clinical outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and influence of alignment on prosthesis survival rate. Singapore Medical Journal 2006, 47(9):796-802
26. Tregonning R, Rothwell A, Hobbs T, Hartnett N: Early failure of the Oxford phase 3 cemented medial uni-compartmental knee joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91-B(Supp II):339