Clinical outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and influence of alignment on prosthesis survival rate

Singapore Medical Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 796-802

  Kasodekar, V B ^a   Yeo, Seng Jin ^a   Othman, S ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Prosthesis; Unicompartmental knee arthroplastsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748632658     PISSN: 00375675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226):14-20.
2. Barrett WP, Scott RD. Revision of failed Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69:1328-35.
3. Padgett D, Stern SH, Insall JN. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73:186-90.
4. Amendola A, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Apyan PM. Total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4 suppl:S11-7.
5. Repicci JA. Total knee or uni? Benefits and limitations of unicondylar knee prosthesis. Orthopedics 2003; 26:274-7.
6. Engh GA, Ammeen D. Is an intact anterior cruciate ligament needed in order to have a well-functioning unicondylar knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428):170-3.
7. Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Eight- to 12-year follow up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (271):96-100.
8. Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286):143-8.
9. Kozinn SC, Scott RD. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71:145-50.
10. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367):50-60.
11. Capra SW Jr, Fehring TK. Unicondylar arthroplasty. A survivorship analysis. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7:247-51.
12. Christensen NO. Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273):165-9.
13. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Uniconpartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367):61-72.
14. Insall J, Aglietti P. A five to seven-year followup of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62:1329-37.
15. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60:182-5.
16. Bernasek TL, Rand JA, Bryan RS. Unicompartmental porous coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (236):52-9.
17. Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A. Polyethylene wear of the PCA Unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4-8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63:260-2.
18. Swienckowski J, Page BJ 2nd. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Use of the L-cut and comparison with the tibial inset method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (239):161-7.
19. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80:983-9.
20. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13:373-9.
21. Insall J, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248):13-4.
22. Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (221):278-85.
23. Perkins TR, Gunckle W. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 3- to 10-year results in a community hospital setting. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17:293-7.
24. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59:77-9.
25. Lootvoet L, Burton P, Himmer O, Pilot L, Ghosez JP. [A unicompartment knee prosthesis: the effect of the positioning of the tibial plate on the functional results]. Acta Orthop Belg 1997; 63:94-101. French.
26. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanism in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428):26-34.
27. Moller JT, Weeth RE, Keller JO. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of tibial component placement. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56:115-9.
28. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84:2235-9.
29. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, et al. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19:296-301.
30. Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO, Barden RM, Rosenburg AG. Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:764-71.
31. Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 423:161-5.
32. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery, 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11:782-8.