The establishment of genetically engineered canola populations in the U.S.

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2011, Pages

  Schafer, Meredith G ^a   Ross, Andrew A ^b   Londo, Jason P ^a   Burdick, Connie A ^c   Lee, E Henry ^c   Travers, Steven E ^b   van de Water, Peter K ^d   Sagers, Cynthia L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOWERING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOTYPE; NONHUMAN; PLANT REPRODUCTION; RAPESEED; SPECIES CULTIVATION; TRANSGENIC PLANT; UNITED STATES; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; STATISTICS;

BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS;

BRASSICA NAPUS; DATA COLLECTION; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053601693     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025736     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Corvalan C, Hales S, McMichael A, (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: health synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Geneva World Health Organization.
2. Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT, (2002) Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296: 2386-2388.
3. Beckie HJ, Warwick SI, Nair H, Seguin-Swartz G, (2003) Gene flow in commercial fields of herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Ecol Appl 13: 1276-1294.
4. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR, (2000) The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290: 2088-2093.
5. Lu B-R, Snow AA, (2005) Gene flow genetically modified rice and its environmental consequences. BioScience 55: 669-678.
6. Levin D, Francisco-Ortega J, Jansen R, (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv Biol 10: 10-16.
7. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF, (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 539-563.
8. Reichman JR, Watrud LS, Lee EH, Burdick CA, Bollman, et al. (2006) Establishment of transgenic herbicide-resistant creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonoifera L.) in nonagronomic habitats. Mol Ecol 15: 4243-4255.
9. Zapiola ML, Campbell CK, Butler MD, Mallory-Smith CA, (2008) Escape and establishment of transgenic, glyphosate-resistant creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera in Oregon, USA: a 4-year study. J Appl Ecol 45: 486-494.
10. Sinemus K, (2009) European Commission Sixth Framework Programme. Available: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/plants/63.rapeseed.html. Accessed 2011 Sep 12.
11. Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMG, (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20: 567-574.
12. Federoff NV, Battisti DS, Beach RN, Cooper PJM, Fischhoff DA, et al. (2010) Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science 327: 833-834.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) Available: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Accessed 2011 Sep 12.
14. FitzJohn RG, Armstrong TT, Newstrom-Lloyd LE, Wilton AD, Cochrane M, (2007) Hybridisation within Brassica and allied genera: evaluation of potential for transgene escape. Euphytica 158: 209-230.
15. United States Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service (2011) The PLANTS Database. Available: http://plants.usda.gov, Accessed 2011 Sep12.
16. Warwick SI, Simard M-J, Légère A, Beckie HJ, Braun L, et al. (2003) Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: B. rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O. E. Schulz. Theor Appl Genet 107: 528-539.
17. Knispel AL, McLachlan SM, Van Acker RC, Friesen LF, (2008) Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Sci 56: 72-80.
18. Knispel AL, McLachlan SM, (2010) Landscape-scale distribution and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in Manitoba, Canada. Environ Sci Pollut R 17: 13-25.
19. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, (1995) Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway. P R Soc B 256: 49-54.
20. Pessel FD, Lecomte J, Emeriau V, Krouti M, Messean A, Gouyon PH, (2001) Persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields. Theor Appl Genet 102: 841-846.
21. Aono M, Wakiyama S, Nagatsu M, Nakajima N, Tamaoki M, et al. (2006) Detection of feral transgenic oilseed rape with multiple-herbicide resistance in Japan. Environ Biosafety R 5: 77-87.
22. Watrud LS, Lee EH, Fairbrother A, Burdick C, Reichman JR, et al. (2004) Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentrgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci-Biol 101: 14533-14538.
23. Gómez-Campo C, Prakash S, (1999) Origin and domestication. In: Gómez-Campo C, editors. Biology of Brassica coenospecies Netherlands Elsevier pp. 33-58.
24. Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ, Thomas AG, (2003) Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci 51: 83-86.
25. Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ, Thomas AG, (2003) Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada. Weed Sci 51: 904-913.