Spatial analytical techniques for risk based decision support systems

Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 75-93

  Johnson, Mark S ^a   Korcz, Marek ^b   Von Stackelberg, Katherine ^c,d   Hope, Bruce K ^e  

^a U S ARMY CENTER FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ECOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS   (Poland)

^c EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^d HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

^e Air Quality Division   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053590773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09722-0_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Burmaster DE, Thompson KM (1997) Estimating exposure point concentrations for surface soils for use in deterministic and probabilistic risk assessments. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3:363-384
2. Chiang WH, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-Groundwater Modeling with PMWIN. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 346
3. Clifford PA, Barchers DE, Ludwig DF, Sielken RL, Klingensmith JS, Graham RV, Banton MI. 1995. An approach to quantifying spatial components for ecological risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:895-906
4. Cullen AC (1995) The sensitivity of probabilistic risk assessment results to alternative model structures: A case study of municipal waste incineration. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 45:538-546
5. Demetriades A (1999) Geochemical Atlas of the Lavrion Urban Area for Environmental Protection and Planning: Explanatory Text. Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration, Athens, Greece, Open File Report, vol. 1
6. Demetriades A (2006) National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus. Part 4 - Quality Assurance and Quality Control, Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty and Compilation of Probability Risk Assessment Maps. Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration, Athens, Greece
7. De Mott RP, Balaraman A, Sorensen MT (2005) The future direction of ecological risk assessment in the United States: Reflecting on the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Examination of Risk Assessment Practices and Principles". Integr Environ Assess Manag 1:77-82
8. Dortch MS, Gerald JA (2004) Recent advances in the army risk assessment modeling system. In: Whelan G, (ed.) Brownfields, Multimedia Modeling and Assessment, WIT Press, Southampton, UK
9. Freshman JS, Menzie CA (1996) Two wildlife exposure models to assess impacts at the individual and population levels and the efficacy of remedial actions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:481-498
10. Gilbert RO (1987) Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
11. Gobas F A P C (1993) A model for predicting the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic chemicals in aquatic food-webs: application to Lake Ontario. Ecol Model 69:1-17.
12. Gobas F A P C, Z'Graggen MN, Zhang X (1995) Time response of the Lake Ontario ecosystem to virtual elimination of PCBs. Environ Sci Technol 29(8):2038-2046
13. Hope BK (2000) Generating probabilistic spatially-explicit individual and population exposure estimates for ecological risk assessments. Risk Anal 20:573-588
14. Hope BK (2001a) A case study comparing static and spatially explicit ecological exposure analysis methods. Risk Anal 21:1001-1010
15. Hope BK (2001b) A spatially and bioenergetically explicit terrestrial ecological exposure model. Toxicol Ind Health 17:322-332
16. Hope BK (2004) Approaches to spatially-explicit, multi-stressor ecological exposure estimation. In: Kapustka LA, Gilbraith H, Luxon M, Biddinger GR (eds) Landscape Ecology and Wildlife Habitat Evaluation: Critical Information for Ecological Risk Assessment, Land-Use Management Activities, and Biodiversity Enhancement Practices. ASTM STP 1458 (American Society for Testing and Materials International), West Conshohocken, PA, pp 311-323
17. Hope BK (2005) Performing spatially and temporarily explicit ecological exposure assessments involving multiple stressors. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11:539-565
18. Johnson MS, Wickwire WT, Quinn MJ Jr, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Burmistrov D, Menzie CA, Geraghty C, Minnich M, Parsons PJ (2007) Are songbirds at risk from lead at small arms ranges? An application of the spatially explicit exposure model (SEEM). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:2215-2225
19. Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon M, Yocum J, Adams WJ. (2004) Application of suitability index values to modify exposure estimates in characterizing ecological risk. In: Kapustka LA, GalbraithH, Luxon M, Biddinger GR (eds), Landscape Ecology and Wildlife Habitat Evaluation: Critical Information for Ecological Risk Assessment, Land-Use Management Activities and Biodiversity Enhancement Practices. ASTM STP 1458. American Standards for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 169-201
20. Kelly EJ, Campbell K (2000) Separating variability and uncertainty in environmental risk assessment - making choices. Human Ecol Risk Assess 6:1-13
21. Korcz M, Bronder J, Sowikowski D, Dugosz J (2003) The role of GIS in post-industrial site management on example of Tarnowskie Gory megasite. In: Procc ConSoil 2003, 8th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil Gent, Belgium, pp 3113-3119, http://www.euwelcome.nl/kims/about/index.php?index= 10
22. Linkov I, Burmistrov D, Cura J, Bridges TS (2002) Risk-based management of contaminated sediments: consideration of spatial and temporal patterns in exposure modeling. Environ Sci Technol 36:238-246
23. Maidment DR, Djokic D (2000) Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Support with Geographic Information Systems, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA
24. Morgan MG, Henrion M (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York
25. Ramsey MH (1992) Sampling and analytical quality control (SAX) for improved estimation in the measurement of Pb in the environment using robust analysis of variance. Applied Geochem, Suppl Issue No. 2, pp 149-153
26. Ramsey MH (1998) Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources. J Anal At Spectrom 13:97-104
27. Ramsey MH, Argyraki A (1997) Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 198:243-257
28. Stackelberg Von K, Vorhees D, Linkov I, Burmistrov D, Bridges T. (2002a) Importance of uncertainty and variability to predicted risks from trophic transfer of contaminants in dredged sediments. Risk Anal 22:499-512
29. Stackelberg Von K, Burmistrov D, Linkov I, Cura J, Bridges TS (2002b) The use of spatial modeling in an aquatic food web to estimate exposure and risk. Sci Tot Environ 288 (1-2):97-110
30. Thompson KM, Graham JD (1996) Going beyond the single number: Using probabilistic risk assessment to improve risk management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:1008-1034
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Exposure Factors Handbook, vol. 1-3, EPA/600/P-95/002Fa-c, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Calculating Upper Confidence Limits for Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites. OSWER Directive 9285.6-10. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) An Examination of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices. EPA/100/B-04/001. Office of the Science Advisor, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC
34. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) (1981) Standards for the Development of Habitat Suitability Index Models for Use in the Habitat Evaluation Procedures. ESM 103 U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Division of Ecological Services, Washington DC
35. Wcislo E, Dlugosz J, Korcz M (2005) A human health risk assessment software for facilitating management of urban contaminated sites: A case study: The Massa Site, Tuscany, Italy. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 11(5):1005-1024
36. Wickwire WT, Menzie CA, Burmistrov D, Hope BK (2004) Incorporating spatial data into ecological risk assessments: the spatially explicit exposure module (SEEM) for ARAMS. In: Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon M, Biddinger GR (eds) Landscape Ecology and Wildlife Habitat Evaluation: Critical Information for Ecological Risk Assessment, Land-Use Management Activities and Biodiversity Enhancement Practices. ASTM STP 1458. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 297-310
37. Woodbury P (2003) Do's and don'ts of spatially explicit ecological risk assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:977-982
38. Zakikhani M, Brandon DL, Dortch MS, Gerald JA (2006) Demonstration applications of ARAMS for aquatic and terrestrial ecological risk assessment. ERDC/EL TR-06-1. Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center; Vicksburg, Mississippi