Automated computation of the fundamental matrix for vision based construction site applications

Advanced Engineering Informatics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 725-735

  Jog, Gauri M ^a   Fathi, Habib ^a   Brilakis, Ioannis ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Fundamental matrix; Normalized eight point algorithm; Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF)

Indexed keywords

3D RECONSTRUCTION; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; CONSTRUCTION COMMUNITIES; CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS; CONSTRUCTION SITES; EPIPOLAR GEOMETRY; FRAMES PER SECONDS; FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX; IMAGE PAIRS; MOVING OBJECTS; POINT CORRESPONDENCE; REAL-TIME APPLICATION; ROBUST METHODS; SPEEDED UP ROBUST FEATURES (SURF); VIDEO DATA ANALYSIS; VIDEO FRAME; VISION BASED;

ALGORITHMS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; MATRIX ALGEBRA; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 80053585753     PISSN: 14740346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G. Csurka, C. Zeller, Z. Zhang, and O. Faugeras Characterizing the uncertainty of the fundamental matrix Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 68 1 1996 18 36 (Pubitemid 127434065)
2. Q.T. Luong, and O. Faugeras Self-calibration of a moving camera from point correspondences and fundamental matries Int. J. Comput. Vision 22 3 1997 261 289 (Pubitemid 127507399)
3. B. Boufama, and R. Mohr Epipole and fundamental matrix estimation using the virtual parallax property Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Vision 1995 IEEE Computer Society Press Boston MA 1030 1036
4. G.M. Jog, I.K. Brilakis, Auto-calibration of a camera system using Image-Alignment, in: Proceedings of the 2009 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, 2009, pp. 186-195.
5. M. Golparvar-Fard, F. Peña-Mora, and S. Savarese D4AR-A 4-Dimensional augmented reality model for automating construction progress data collection, processing and communication J. Inf. Technol. Constr. (ITcon) 14 2009 129 153 Special issue next generation construction IT: technology foresight, future studies, roadmapping, and scenario planning
6. M. Golparvar-Fard, F. Pena-Mora, S. Savarese, D4AR - 4 Dimensional augmented reality - tools for automated remote progress tracking and support of decision-enabling tasks in the AEC/FM industry, Int. Conf. on Innovations in AEC, Jun 2010.
7. J. Teizer, and P.A. Vela Personnel tracking on construction sites using video cameras Adv. Eng. Inf. 23 4 2009 452 462
8. F. Cordova, I. Brilakis, On-site 3D vision tracking of construction personnel, in: Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction Management, 2008, pp. 809-820.
9. C. Harris, M. Stephens, A combined corner and edge detector, in: Proceedings of the Alvey Vision Conference, 1988, pp. 90-96.
10. C. Tomasi, T. Kanade, Detection and tracking of point features, Carnegie Mellon, Tech. Rep., April 1991.
11. D.G. Lowe Object recognition from local scale-invariant features Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vision 2 1999 1150 1157
12. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool SURF: speeded up robust features Comput. Vision - ECCV 2006 3951 2006 404 417 (Pubitemid 44029795)
13. J. Bauer, N. Sunderhauf, P. Protzel, Comparing Several Implementations of Two Recently Published Feature Detectors, In: Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent and Autonomous Systems, IAV, Toulouse, France, 2007.
14. H.C. Longuet-Higgins A computer algorithm for reconstruction a scene from two projections Nature 293 1981 133 135
15. K. Kanatani, Y. Sugaya, Small Algorithm for Fundamental Matrix Computation 11th Meeting on Image Recognition and Understanding, Karuizawa, Japan, 2008, pp. 947-954.
16. J. Huang, S. Lai, and C. Cheng Robust fundamental matrix estimation with accurate outlier detection J. Inf. Sci. Eng. 23 2007 1215 1225
17. Q.T. Luong, R. Deriche, O. Faugeras, and T. Papadopoulo On Determining the Fundamental Matrix: Analysis of Different Methods and Results 1993 INRIA Sophia-Antipolis France
18. R. Hartley, and A. Zisserman Multiple View Geometry in computer vision Second ed. 2000, 2003 Cambridge UP
19. Z. Zhang Determining epipolar geometry and its uncertainty: a review Int. J. Comput. Vision 27 2 1998 161 195 (Pubitemid 128529716)
20. P.H.S. Torr, and D.W. Murray The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix Int. J. Comput. Vision 24 3 1997 271 300 (Pubitemid 127506557)
21. H. Fathi, I. Brilakis, Automated sparse 3D point cloud generation of infrastructure using its distinctive visual features, Journal of Advanced Engineering Informatics, Elsevier, in review, 2011.
22. Y. Ke, and R. Sukthankar PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors CVPR 2 2004 506 513
23. K. Mikolajczyk, and C. Schmid A performance evaluation of local descriptors PAMI 27 10 2005 1615 1630 (Pubitemid 41555406)
24. R. Hartley In defence of the eight point algorithm Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Vision 1995 IEEE Computer Science Press Boston, MA 1064 1070
25. X. Armangué, and J. Salvi Overall view regarding fundamental matrix estimation Image Vis. Comput. 1 2003 205 220
26. W. Chojnacki, M.J. Brooks, D. Galwey, A. van den Hengel, A new approach to constrained parameter estimation applicable to some computer vision problems, Statistical Methods in Video Processing Workshop, help in conjunction with ECCV '02 Copenhagen, Denmark, June 1-2, 2002.
27. P.H.S. Torr, and A. Zisserman MLESAC: a new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 78 2000 138 156 (Pubitemid 30596414)
28. P.H.S. Torr Bayesian model estimation and selection for epipolar geometry and generic manifold fitting Int. J. Comput. Vision 50 1 2002 35 61 (Pubitemid 35311916)
29. N. Snavely, S.M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings) 25 3 2006 835 846 (Pubitemid 44481045)
30. S. Agarwal, Y. Furukawa, N. Snavely, B. Curless, S.M. Seitz, and R. Szeliski Reconstructing Rome Trans. IEEE Comput. Cover Feature 43 6 2010 40 47
31. S. Han, F. Peña-Mora, M. Golparvar-Fard, S. Roh, D4AR For Safety Management, 2009 ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, 2009
32. H.-G. Maas, and U. Hampel Photogrammetric techniques in civil engineering material testing and structure monitoring Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 72 1 2006 39 45 (Pubitemid 43076090)
33. J. Eng Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology 227 2 2003 309 313 (Pubitemid 36514740)