Revealing plant defense signaling getting more sophisticated with phosphoproteomics

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1469-1474

  Xing, Tim ^a   Laroche, André ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LETHBRIDGE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Kinase; Phosphoproteomics; Plant pathogen interaction; Protein phosphorylation

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053581724     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.6.10.17345     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Peck SC. Analysis of protein phosphorylation: methods and strategies for studying kinases and substrates. Plant J 2006; 45:512-22 PMID:16441346; DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02613.x.
2. Oeljeklaus S, Meyer HE, Warscheid B. Advancements in plant proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry. J Proteomics 2009; 72:545-54 PMID:19049910; DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2008.11.008.
3. Thurston G, Regan S, Rampitsch C, Xing T. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic approaches to understanding plant-pathogen interactions. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2005; 66:3-11 DOI:10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.03.004.
4. Posewitz MC, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal Chem 1999; 71:2883-92 PMID:10424175; DOI:10.1021/ac981409y.
5. Kersten B, Agrawa GK, Durek P, Neigenfind J, Schulze W, Walther D, et al. Plant phosphoproteomics: An update. Proteomics 2009; 9:964-88 PMID:19212952; DOI:10.1002/pmic.200800548.
6. Nakagami H, Sugiyama N, Mochida K, Daudi A, Yoshida Y, Toyoda T, et al. Large-scale comparative phosphoproteomics identifies conserved phosphorylation sites in plants. Plant Physiol 2010; 153:1161-74 PMID:20466843; DOI:10.1104/pp.110.157347.
7. Sugiyama N, Nakagami H, Mochida K, Daudi A, Tomita M, Shirasu K, et al. Large-scale phosphorylation mapping reveals the extent of tyrosine phosphorylation in Arabidopsis. Mol Syst Biol 2008; 4:193-9 PMID:18463617; DOI:10.1038/msb.2008.32.
8. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL, Gómez-Gómez L, et al. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002; 415:977-83 PMID:11875555; DOI:10.1038/415977a.
9. Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nürnberger T, Jones JDJ, et al. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature 2007; 448:497-500 PMID:17625569; DOI:10.1038/nature05999.
10. Nühse TS, Bottrill AR, Jones AME, Peck SC. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins reveals regulatory mechanisms of plant innate immune responses. Plant J 2007; 51:931-40 PMID:17651370; DOI:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03192.x.
11. Navarro L, Zipfel C, Rowland O, Keller I, Robatzek S, Boller T, et al. The transcriptional innate immune response to flg22: Interplay and overlap with Avr genedependent defense responses and bacterial pathogenesis. Plant Physiol 2004; 135:1113-28 PMID:15181213; DOI:10.1104/pp.103.036749.
12. Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen W, Glazebrook J, Chang HS, Han B, et al. Quantitative nature of Arabidopsis responses during compatible and incompatible interactions with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell 2003; 15:317-30 PMID:12566575; DOI:10.1105/ tpc.007591.
13. Benschop JJ, Mohammed S, O'Flaherty M, Heck AJ, Slijper M, Menke FL. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of early elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007; 6:1198-214 PMID:17317660; DOI:10.1074/mcp.M600429-MCP200.
14. Nühse TS, Stansballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane and a new phosphorylation site database. Plant Cell 2004; 16:2394-405 PMID:15308754; DOI:10.1105/tpc.104.023150.
15. de la Fuente van Bentem S, Hirt H. Using phosphoproteomics to reveal signalling dynamics in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12:404-11 PMID:17765599; DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.007.
16. Nühse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Largescale analysis of in vivo phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003; 2:1234-43 PMID:14506206; DOI:10.1074/mcp.T300006-MCP200.
17. Romeis T, Ludwig AA, Martin R, Jones JDG. Calciumdependent protein kinase plays an essential role in the plant defense response. EMBO J 2001; 20:5556-67 PMID:11597999; DOI:10.1093/emboj/20.20.5556.
18. Xing T, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E. Regulation of plant defense response to fungal pathogens: two types of protein kinases in the reversible phosphorylation of the host plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Cell 1996; 8:555-64 PMID:12239392.
19. Hardham AR, Jones DR, Takemoto D. Cytoskeleton and cell wall function in penetration resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2007; 10:342-8 PMID:17627866; DOI:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.05.001.
20. Lipka V, Dittgen J, Bednarek P, Bhat R, Wiermer M, Stein M, et al. Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 2005; 310:1180-3 PMID:16293760; DOI:10.1126/science.1119409.
21. Colcombet J, Hirt H. Arabidopsis MAPKs: a complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem J 2008; 413:217-26 PMID:18570633; DOI:10.1042/BJ20080625.
22. Feilner T, Hultschig C, Lee J, Meyer S, Immink RGH, Koenig A, et al. High throughput identification of potential Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinases substrates. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4:1558-68 PMID:16009969; DOI:10.1074/mcp.M500007-MCP200.
23. Joshi HJ, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Baerenfaller K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S, Schmidt R, et al. MASCP Gator: an aggregation portal for the visualization of Arabidopsis proteomics data. Plant Physiol 2011; 155:259-70 PMID:21075962; DOI:10.1104/pp.110.168195.
24. Xing T, Rampitsch C, Miki BL, Mauthe W, Stebbing JA, Malik K, et al. MALDI-Qq-TOF-MS and transient gene expression analysis indicated co-enhancement of β-1,3-glucanase and endochitinase by tMEK2 and the involvement of divergent pathways. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2003; 62:209-17 DOI:10.1016/S0885-5765(03)00062-6.
25. Kimura N, Shimada N, Ishijima Y, Fukuda M, Takagi Y, Ishikawa N. Nucleoside diphosphate kinases in mammalian signal transduction systems: recent development and perspective. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2003; 35:41-7 PMID:12848340; DOI:10.1023/A:1023489722460.
26. Xing T, Rampitsch C, Sun S, Romanowski A, Conroy C, Stebbing J, et al. TAB2, a nucleoside diphosphate protein kinase, is a component of the tMEK2 disease resistance pathway in tomato. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2008; 73:33-9 DOI:10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.11.003.
27. Bolton MD. Primary metabolism and plant defense-fuel for the fire. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2009; 22:487-97 PMID:19348567; DOI:10.1094/MPMI-22-5-0487.
28. Fan T, Gao Y, Al-Shammari A, Wang XJ, Xing T. Yeast two-hybrid screening of MAP kinase cascade identifies cytosolic glutamine synthetase 1b as a tMEK2 interactive protein in wheat. Can J Plant Pathol 2009; 31:407-14 DOI:10.1080/07060660909507615.
29. Finnemann J, Schjoerring JK. Post-translational regulation of cytosolic glutamine synthetase by reversible phosphorylation and 14-3-3 protein interaction. Plant J 2000; 24:171-81 PMID:11069692; DOI:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00863.x.
30. Bernard SM, Habash DZ. The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytol 2009; 182:608-20 PMID:19422547; DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02823.x.
31. Peck SC. Early phosphorylation events in biotic stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6:334-8 PMID:12873527; DOI:10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00056-6.
32. Jakoby MJ, Wein C, Pusch S, Kuijt SJH, Merkle T, Dissmeyer N, et al. Analysis of the subcellular localization, function and proteolytic control of the Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1/KRP11. Plant Physiol 2006; 141:1293-305 PMID:16766674; DOI:10.1104/pp.106.081406.
33. Reinders A, Schulze W, Kühn C, Barker L, Schulz A, Ward JM, et al. Protein-protein interactions between sucrose transporters of different affinities colocalized in the same enucleate sieve element. Plant Cell 2002; 14:1567-77 PMID:12119375; DOI:10.1105/ tpc.002428.
34. Timmers J, Vernhettes S, Desprez T, Vincken J, Visser R, Trindade L. Interactions between membrane-bound cellulose synthases involved in the synthesis of the secondary cell wall. FEBS Lett 2009; 583:978-82 PMID:19258017; DOI:10.1016/j.febslet. 2009.02.035.
35. Morandell S, Grosstessner-Hain K, Roitinger E, Hudecz O, Lindhorst T, Teis D, et al. QIKS-Quantitative identification of kinase substrates. Proteomics 2010; 10:2015-25 PMID:20217869; DOI:10.1002/pmic.200900749.
36. Nakazono M, Qiu F, Borusk LA, Schnable PS. Laser capture microdissection, a tool for the global expression in specific plant cell types: identification of genes expressed differentially in epidermal cells or vascular tissue in maize. Plant Cell 2003; 15:583-96 DOI:10.1105/tpc.008102.
37. Dardick C, Chen J, Richter T, Ouyang S, Ronald P. The rice kinase database: phylogenomic database for the rice kinome. Plant Physiol 2007; 143:579-86 PMID:17172291; DOI:10.1104/pp.106.087270.
38. Jiang J, Parker CE, Fuller JR, Kawula TH, Borchers CH. An immunoaffinity tandem mass spectrometry (iMALDI) assay for detection of Francisella tularensis. Anal Chim Acta 2007; 605:70-9 PMID:18022413; DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2007.10.025.
39. Reid JD, Holmes DT, Mason DR, Shah B, Borchers CH. Towards the development of an immuno MALDI (iMALDI) mass spectrometry assay for the diagnosis of hypertension. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2010; 21:1680-6 PMID:20199871; DOI:10.1016/j. jasms.2010.01.024.