NanoSMGT: Transgene transmission into bovine embryos using halloysite clay nanotubes or nanopolymer to improve transfection efficiency

Theriogenology

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1552-1560

  Campos, Vinicius Farias ^a   de Leon, Priscila Marques Moura ^a   Komninou, Eliza Rossi ^a   Dellagostin, Odir Antônio ^a   Deschamps, João Carlos ^a   Seixas, Fabiana Kömmling ^a   Collares, Tiago ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cattle; Exogenous DNA; Halloysite clay nanotubes; Nanopolymer; SMGT

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; LIPOSOME; NANOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CLAY; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; METHODOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; CATTLE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LIPOSOMES; NANOSTRUCTURES; TRANSFECTION;

BOS; BOVINAE;

EID: 80053571509     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.06.027     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Canovas S., Gutierrez-Adan A., Gadea J. Effect of exogenous DNA on bovine sperm functionality using the sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) technique. Mol Reprod Dev 2010, 77:687-698.
2. Wall R.J. New gene transfer methods. Theriogenology 2002, 57:189-201.
3. Smith K., Spadafora C. Sperm-mediated gene transfer: applications and implications. Bioessays 2005, 27:551-562.
4. Kang J.H., Hakimov H., Ruiz A., Friendship R.M., Buhr M., Golovan S.P. The negative effects of exogenous DNA binding on porcine spermatozoa are caused by removal of seminal fluid. Theriogenology 2008, 70:1288-1296.
5. Collares T., Campos V.F., Seixas F.K., et al. Transgene transmission in South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen) larvae by sperm-mediated gene transfer. J Biosci 2010, 35:39-47.
6. Anzar M., Buhr M.M. Spontaneous uptake of exogenous DNA by bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2006, 65:683-690.
7. Garcia-Vazquez F.A., Garcia-Rosello E., Gutierrez-Adan A., Gadea J. Effect of sperm treatment on efficiency of EGFP-expressing porcine embryos produced by ICSI-SMGT. Theriogenology 2009, 72:506-518.
8. Lanes C.F., Sampaio L.A., Marins L.F. Evaluation of DNase activity in seminal plasma and uptake of exogenous DNA by spermatozoa of the Brazilian flounder Paralichthys orbignyanus. Theriogenology 2009, 71:525-533.
9. Garcia-Vazquez F.A., Ruiz S., Grullon L.A., Ondiz A.D., Gutierrez-Adan A., Gadea J. Factors affecting porcine sperm mediated gene transfer. Res Vet Sci 2010, (In press).
10. Spadafora C. Sperm-mediated gene transfer: mechanisms and implications. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007, 65:459-467.
11. Campos V.F., Komninou E.R., Urtiaga G., et al. NanoSMGT: transfection of exogenous DNA on sex-sorted bovine sperm using nanopolymer. Theriogenology 2011, 75:1476-1481.
12. Harel-Markowitz E., Gurevich M., Shore L.S., Katz A., Stram Y., Shemesh M. Use of sperm plasmid DNA lipofection combined with REMI (restriction enzyme-mediated insertion) for production of transgenic chickens expressing eGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) or human follicle-stimulating hormone. Biol Reprod 2009, 80:1046-1052.
13. Campos V.F., Amaral M.G., Seixas F.K., et al. Exogenous DNA uptake by South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen) after seminal plasma removal. Animal Reproduction Science 2011, 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.05.004.
14. Kim T.S., Lee S.H., Gang G.T., et al. Exogenous DNA Uptake of Boar Spermatozoa by a Magnetic Nanoparticle Vector System. Reprod Domest Anim 2010, 45:e201-e206.
15. Levis S.R., Deasy P.B. Characterisation of halloysite for use as a microtubular drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 2002, 243:125-134.
16. Vergaro V., Abdullayev E., Lvov Y.M., et al. Cytocompatibility and uptake of halloysite clay nanotubes. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:820-826.
17. Zhang Y., Luo J., Bi J., et al. Efficient separation of homologous alpha-lactalbumin from transgenic bovine milk using optimized hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2010, 1217:3668-3673.
18. Milazzotto M.P., Goissis M.D., Feitosa W.B., et al. Myostatin gene knockdown through lentiviral-mediated delivery of shRNA for in vitro production of transgenic bovine embryos. Zygote 2010, 18:339-344.
19. Soroldoni D., Hogan B.M., Oates A.C. Simple and efficient transgenesis with meganuclease constructs in zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol 2009, 546:117-130.
20. Hoelker M., Mekchay S., Schneider H., et al. Quantification of DNA binding, uptake, transmission and expression in bovine sperm mediated gene transfer by RT-PCR: effect of transfection reagent and DNA architecture. Theriogenology 2007, 67:1097-1107.
21. Shemesh M., Gurevich M., Harel-Markowitz E., Benvenisti L., Shore L.S., Stram Y. Gene integration into bovine sperm genome and its expression in transgenic offspring. Mol Reprod Dev 2000, 56:306-308.
22. Feitosa W.B., Mendes C.M., Milazzotto M.P., et al. Exogenous DNA uptake by bovine spermatozoa does not induce DNA fragmentation. Theriogenology 2010, 74:563-568.
23. Feitosa W.B., Milazzotto M.P., Simoes R., et al. Bovine sperm cells viability during incubation with or without exogenous DNA. Zygote 2009, 17:315-320.
24. Parrish J.J., Susko-Parrish J.L., Leibfried-Rutledge M.L., Critser E.S., Eyestone W.H., First N.L. Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 1986, 25:591-600.
25. Nedambale T.L., Dinnyes A., Yang X., Tian X.C. Bovine blastocyst development in vitro: timing, sex, and viability following vitrification. Biol Reprod 2004, 71:1671-1676.
26. Bachiller D., Schellander K., Peli J., Ruther U. Liposome-mediated DNA uptake by sperm cells. Mol Reprod Dev 1991, 30:194-200.
27. Smith K.R. The role of sperm-mediated gene transfer in genome mutation and evolution. Med Hypotheses 2002, 59:433-437.
28. Pampinella F., Lechardeur D., Zanetti E., et al. Analysis of differential lipofection efficiency in primary and established myoblasts. Mol Ther 2002, 5:161-169.
29. Scherer F., Anton M., Schillinger U., et al. Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther 2002, 9:102-109.
30. Yao H., Ng S.S., Tucker W.O., et al. The gene transfection efficiency of a folate-PEI600-cyclodextrin nanopolymer. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5793-5803.
31. Fischer D., Bieber T., Li Y., Elsasser H.P., Kissel T. A novel non-viral vector for DNA delivery based on low molecular weight, branched polyethylenimine: effect of molecular weight on transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity. Pharm Res 1999, 16:1273-1279.
32. Wu Y., Phillips J.A., Liu H., Yang R., Tan W. Carbon nanotubes protect DNA strands during cellular delivery. ACS Nano 2008, 2:2023-2028.
33. Chen C.C., Liu Y.C., Wu C.H., Yeh C.C., Su M.T., Wu Y.C. Preparation of fluorescent silica nanotubes and their application in gene delivery. Advanced Materials 2005, 17:404-407.
34. Gagne M.B., Pothier F., Sirard M.A. Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry foreign DNA in oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1991, 29:6-15.
35. Sperandio S., Lulli V., Bacci M.L., et al. Sperm-mediated DNA transfer in bovine and swine species. Animal Biotechnology 1996, 7:59-77.
36. Rieth A., Pothier F., Sirard M.A. Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry DNA containing highly repetitive sequences into oocytes and detection of homologous recombination events. Mol Reprod Dev 2000, 57:338-345.
37. Chan A.W., Kukolj G., Skalka A.M., Bremel R.D. Timing of DNA integration, transgenic mosaicism, and pronuclear microinjection. Mol Reprod Dev 1999, 52:406-413.
38. Murakami M., Fahrudin M., Varisanga M.D., Suzuki T. Fluorescence expression by bovine embryos after pronuclear microinjection with the EGFP gene. J Vet Med Sci 1999, 61:843-847.
39. Garcia-Vazquez F.A., Ruiz S., Matas C., et al. Production of transgenic piglets using ICSI-sperm-mediated gene transfer in combination with recombinase RecA. Reproduction 2010, 140:259-272.
40. Pereyra-Bonnet F., Gibbons A., Cueto M., Sipowicz P., Fernandez-Martin R., Salamone D. Efficiency of Sperm-Mediated Gene Transfer in the Ovine by Laparoscopic Insemination, In Vitro Fertilization and ICSI. J Reprod Dev 2011, 57:188-196.