Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 593-615

  Connors, Richard D ^a   Sumalee, Agachai ^a   Watling, David P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Network design problem; Optimal toll; Probit stochastic user equilibrium; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; TOLL HIGHWAYS;

MULTIPLE USER-CLASSES; NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM; PROBIT STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM;

TRANSPORTATION;

GRADIENT ANALYSIS; NETWORK DESIGN; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; ROAD PRICING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 33947184258     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bar-Gera, H., 2001. Transportation network test problems. http://www.bgu.ac.il/∼bargera/tntp/.
2. Bell M.G.H., and Iida Y. Transportation Network Analysis (1997), Wiley, Chichester
3. Bell, M.G.H., Cassir, C., Iida, Y., Lam, W.H.K., 1999. A sensitivity based approach to network reliability assessment. In: 14th Int. Symp on Transportation and Traffic Theory. pp. 283-300.
4. Cantarella G.E. A general fixed point approach to multi-mode multi-user equilibrium assignment with elastic demand. Transportation Science 31 (1997) 107-128
5. Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F., Vitetta, A., 1996. A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Thirteenth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France.
6. Chen A., Yang H., Lo H.K., and Tang W.H. Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results. Transportation Research Part B 36 3 (2002) 225-252
7. Clark S.D., and Watling D.P. Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 36 7 (2002) 617-635
8. Connors, R., Sumalee, A., Watling, D., 2003. Understanding the variable demand probit-based network design problem. In: UTSG 36th Annual Conference, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
9. Daganzo C.F. Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting (1979), Academic Press, New York
10. Daganzo C.F. Stochastic network equilibrium with multiple vehicle types and asymmetric, indefinite link cost Jacobians. Transportation Science 17 3 (1983) 282-300
11. Daganzo C.F., and Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science 11 3 (1977) 253-274
12. Davis G.A. Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment. Transportation Research Part B 28 1 (1994) 61-75
13. Du Z.P., and Nicholson A. Degradable transportation systems: sensitivity and reliability analysis. Transportation Research Part B 31 3 (1997) 225-237
14. Fisk C. Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transportation Research Part B 14 3 (1980) 243-255
15. Gartner N.H. Optimal traffic assignment with elastic demands - A review.1. Analysis framework. Transportation Science 14 2 (1980) 174-191
16. Gentile, G., Papola, N., 2001. Network design through sensitivity analysis and singular value decomposition. TRISTAN IV, San Miguel, Azores.
17. Genz A. Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1 (1992) 141-149
18. Gliebe J.P., Koppelman F.S., and Ziliaskopoulos A.K. Route Choice Using a Paired Combinatorial Logit Model (1999), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
19. Han S.P. A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 22 (1977) 297
20. Josefsson M., and Patriksson M. Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibria, with application to bilevel optimisation in network design. Transportation Research Part B 41 1 (2007) 4-31
21. Leurent F. Sensitivity and error analysis of the dual criteria traffic assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 32 3 (1998) 189-204
22. Magnanti T.L., and Wong R.T. Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms. Transportation Science 18 (1984) 1-55
23. Maher M.J., and Hughes P.C. A probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 31 4 (1997) 341-355
24. Mathworks, T., 2006. Sqp implementation. http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/toolbox/optim/ug/f26684.html.
25. Mendell N.R., and Elston R.C. Multifactorial qualitative traits: genetic analysis and prediction of recurrence risks. Biometrics 30 (1974) 41-57
26. Nielsen O.A., Daly A., and Frederiksen R.D. A stochastic route choice model for car travellers in the Copenhagen region. Networks and Spatial Economics 2 4 (2002) 327-346
27. Patriksson M., and Rockafellar R.T. A mathematical model and descent algorithm for bilevel traffic management. Transportation Science 36 3 (2002) 271-291
28. Patriksson M., and Rockafellar R.T. Sensitivity analysis of aggregated variational inequality problems, with application to traffic equilibria. Transportation Science 37 1 (2003) 56-68
29. Powell M.J.D. Fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. In: Watson G.A. (Ed). Numerical Analysis (1978), Springer Verlag
30. Prashker J.N., and Bekhor S. Stochastic user-equilibrium formulations for extended-logit assignment models. Transportation Research Record 1676 (1999) 145-151
31. Robinson S.M. Strong regularity and the sensitivity analysis of traffic equilibria: a comment. Transportation Science 40 4 (2006) 540-542
32. Rosa A. Probit Based Methods in Traffic Assignment and Discrete Choice Modelling (2003), Napier University, Edinburgh
33. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods (1985), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
34. Sheffi Y., and Powell W.B. A comparison of stochastic and deterministic traffic assignment over congested networks. Transportation Research Part B 15 1 (1981) 53-64
35. Suwansirikul C., Friesz T.L., and Tobin R.L. Equilibrium decomposed optimization - a heuristic for the continuous equilibrium network design problem. Transportation Science 21 4 (1987) 254-263
36. Tobin R.L., and Friesz T.L. Sensitivity analysis for equilibrium network flow. Transportation Science 22 4 (1988) 242-250
37. Transport, D.f., 2004. Economic assessment of road schemes. The coba manual.
38. Vovsha P., and Bekhor S. The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem. Transportation Research Record 1645 (1998) 133
39. Wilde D.J. Optimum Seeking Methods (1964), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
40. Yai T., Iwakura S., and Morichi S. Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transportation Research Part B 31 3 (1997) 195
41. Yang H. Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications. Transportation Research Part B (1997) 70
42. Yang H., and Bell M.G.H. Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium. Transportation Research Part B 31 4 (1997) 303-314
43. Yang H., Sasaki T., Iida Y., and Asakura Y. Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks. Transportation Research Part B 26 6 (1992) 417-434
44. Ying J.Q., and Miyagi T. Sensitivity analysis for stochastic user equilibrium network flows - a dual approach. Transportation Science 35 2 (2001) 124-133