Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: An interview study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zwaanswijk, Marieke ^a   Verheij, Robert A ^a   Wiesman, Floris J ^b   Friele, Roland D ^a,c  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; NETHERLANDS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80053514177     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-256     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians: From systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. Boonstra A, Broekhuis M, BMC Health Serv Res 2010 10 231 10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 20691097
2. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM, J Am Board Fam Med 2010 23 655 670 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090192 20823361
3. Arnold S, Wieners WW, Global Enterprise Task Force Members, Electronic health records: A global perspective Chicago: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) 2008
4. 'Te vroeg voor landelijk EPD' ['Too early for national EPR']. Katzenbauer M, Medisch Contact 2009 64 880 883
5. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Davis FD, MIS Quart 1989 13 319 340 10.2307/249008
6. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Venkatesh V, Davis FD, Manage Sci 2000 46 186 204 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 (Pubitemid 30594361)
7. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD, MIS Quart 2003 27 425 478
8. Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N, Eur J Inform Syst 2007 16 725 737 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000717
9. Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii 2003
10. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: A questionnaire survey. De Veer AJE, Francke AL, J Nurs Stud 2010 47 846 854 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.016
11. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Braun V, Clarke V, Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006 3 77 101 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
12. Dutch College of General Practitioners, Richtlijn Adequate dossiervorming met het Elektronisch Patintendossier (ADEPD) [Guideline adequate record keeping with the electronic patient record (ADEPD)] Utrecht 2009
13. Inter-organisational communication networks in healthcare: centralised versus decentralised approaches. Pirnejad H, Bal R, Stoop AP, Berg M, Int J Integr Care 2007 7 16 May
14. Het landelijk EPD als black box: Besluitvorming en opinies in kaart [The national EPR as a black box: Decision making and opinions explored]. Pluut B, The Hague: Scientific Council for Government Policy 2010
15. Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy. Walter Z, Lopez MS, Decis Support Syst 2008 46 206 215 10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004
16. Introduction of shared electronic records: Multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Mohammad Y, Russell J, BMJ 2008 337 1786 10.1136/bmj.a1786 18948344
17. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG, Ann Intern Med 2006 144 742 752 16702590 (Pubitemid 46780634)
18. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Shekelle P, Morton SC, Keeler EB, Evid Rep Technol Assess 2006 132 1 71
19. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. Lapointe L, Rivard S, MIS Quart 2005 29 461 491 (Pubitemid 46063138)
20. Naar een landelijk EPD: kanttekeningen bij wetsvoorstel 31 466 [To a national EPR: Comments regarding law proposal 31466]. Ploem MC, Tijdschr Gezondheidsrecht 2010 4 264 284
21. Van 't Noordende G, A security analysis of the Dutch electronic patient record system. Technical Report UVA-SNE-2010-01 Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam 2010
22. The electronic locum record for general practitioners: Outcome of an evaluation study in the Netherlands. Dumay ACM, Haaker TI, Int J Med Inform 2010 79 623 636 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.001 20609619
23. Medicine 2.0 Proceedings. Eysenbach G, (ed.), Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness: 4-5 September 2008; Toronto. J Med Internet Res 2008 10 22
24. Khan NA, Visscher S, Verheij RA, De kwaliteit van het elektronisch patintendossier gemeten: EPD-scan regio Twente, eerste meting Utrecht: NIVEL 2011 [Assessing the quality of the electronic patient record: EMR scan region Twente, first assessment.]
25. PRIMIS+. http://www.primis.nhs.uk/index.php/home
26. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care: An interactive sociotechnical analysis. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S, J Am Med Inform Assn 2007 14 542 549 10.1197/jamia.M2384 (Pubitemid 47379560)
27. Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: Using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model. Vishwanath A, Scamurra SD, Health Inform J 2007 13 119 134 10.1177/1460458207076468 (Pubitemid 46746096)