Access control and authorization for protecting disseminative information in E-learning workflow

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 23, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 2034-2042

  Sun, Lili ^a   Wang, Hua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

access control; E learning; workflow

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

COMMERCIAL MARKET; DIGITAL INFORMATION; E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS; LEARNING ACTIVITY; SECURE ARCHITECTURES; SECURITY SOLUTIONS; TRACKING CAPABILITY; WORKFLOW;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 80053507368     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1748     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Cisco Systems: E-learning. Partner E-Learning Connection, 2004.
2. White G,. The changing landsacpe: E-learning in schools. Technical Report, education.au limited, 2003. Available at: http://admin.edna.edu.au/ dspace/bitstream/2150/54787/1/changing-landscape-gw.pdf.
3. Chen J, Yang Y,. Temporal dependency based checkpoint selection for dynamic verification of fixed-time constraints in grid workflow systems. ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM: New York, NY, U.S.A., 2008; 141-150.
4. Seufert S, Lechner U, Stanoevska K,. A reference model for online learning communities. International Journal on E-Learning 2002; 1 (1): 43-54.
5. Lytras M,. E-learn is about business: A business model for the digital economy. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Montreal, Canada, 2002; 2658-2659.
6. Neely S, Lowe H, Eyers D, Bacon J, Newman J, Gong X,. An architecture for supporting vicarious learning in a distributed environment. SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM Press: New York, U.S.A., 2004; 963-970.
7. Mendling J, Neumann G, Pinterits A, Simon B, Wild F,. Indirect revenue models for e-learning at universities-the case of learn@wu. E-Learning Workshop, Hannover, Germany, 2004.
8. Schmidt K, Wippel T, Furst K,. Security system for distributed business applications. International Journal of Web Services Research 2005; 2 (1): 77-88. (Pubitemid 40080059)
9. Chen J, Yang Y,. Temporal dependency based checkpoint selection for dynamic verification of temporal constraints in scientific workflow systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2009. Available at: http://www.swinflow.org/papers/TOSEM.pdf.
10. El-Khatib K, Korba L, Xu Y, Yee G,. Privacy and security in e-learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies 2003; 1 (4): 11-30.
11. Wang H, Cao J, Zhang Y,. A flexible payment scheme and its role based access control. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2005; 17 (3): 425-436.
12. Wang H, Zhang Y, Cao J,. Effective collaboration with information sharing in virtual universities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2009; 21 (6): 840-853.
13. Hu R, Liu J, Chen J,. Trustworthiness fusion of web services based on D-S evidence theory. Proceedings of IEEE Eighth International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'10), Miami, FL, U.S.A., July 2010.
14. Brad C,. Superdistribution. Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 1996.
15. Cynthia D,. Copyright? protection?, the mathematics of information coding, extraction, and distribution. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications 1999; 107: 31-47.
16. Seufert S,. E-learning business models: Framework and best practice examples. Idea Group, 2001; 11-36.
17. Stafford TF,. Understanding motivations for internet use in distance education. IEEE Transactions on Education 2005; 48 (2): 301-306. (Pubitemid 40784515)
18. Liu X, Chen J, Wu Z, Ni Z, Yuan D, Yang Y,. Handling recoverable temporal violations in scientific workflow systems: A workflow rescheduling based strategy. Proceedings of 10th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid'10), Melbourne, Australia, May 2010; 534-537.
19. Park J, Sandhu R,. Towards usage control models: Beyond traditional access control. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM Press: New York, 2002; 57-64.
20. Jajodia S, Samarati P, Subrahmanian V, Bertino E,. A unified framework for enforcing multiple access control policies. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM Press: New York, 1997; 474-485. (Pubitemid 127456808)
21. Li Q, Atluri V,. Concept-level access control for the semantic web. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Workshop on XML Security. ACM Press: New York, 2003; 94-103.
22. Wang H, Zhang Y, Cao J, Varadharajan V,. Achieving secure and flexible m-services through tickets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, Special Issue on M-Services 2003; 33: 697-708.
23. Goldschlag D, Reed M, Syverson P,. Onion routing for anonymous and private Internet connections. Communications of the ACM 1999; 24 (2): 39-41.
24. Lowe H, Wallis A, Newman J,. Role-based access control for vicarious learning. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning. Brunel University: Uxbridge, 2002; 43-50.
25. Wang H, Cao J, Zhang Y,. An electronic payment scheme and its RBAC management. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application 2004; 12 (3): 247-275.
26. Wang H, Cao J, Zhang Y,. A consumer anonymity scalable payment scheme with role based access control. Second International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE'01), Kyoto, Japan, 2001; 53-62.
27. ISO. Security frameworks for open systems: Access control framework. ISO/IEC 10181-3, 1996.
28. Bertino E, Ferrari E,. Secure and selective dissemination of xml documents. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 2002; 5 (3): 290-331.
29. Damiani E, Capitani S, Samarati P,. Towards securing xml web services. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Workshop on XML Security, Washington, DC, U.S.A. 2002; 90-96.
30. Yong J,. Workflow-based e-learning platform. Ninth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Coventry, U.K., 24-26 May 2005.