An architecture for supporting vicarious learning in a distributed environment

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages 963-970

  Neely, Steve ^a   Lowe, Helen ^a   Eyers, David ^b   Bacon, Jean ^b   Newman, Julian ^c   Gong, Xiaofeng ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

OASIS; Policy; Role based access control

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SECURITY OF DATA; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ACADEMIC PROCESS; OASIS; ROLE BASED ACCESS CONTROL; STUDENT TUTOR INTERACTIONS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 2442562667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/967900.968095     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. G. J. Ahn and R. Sandhu. Role Based Authorization Constraints Specification. ACM Transaction on Information and System Security, 3(4), November 2000.
2. J. Bacon, K. Moody, D. Chadwick, and O. Otenko. Persistent versus Dynamic Role Membership. In IFIP WG 11.3 Working Conference on Database and Applications Security, Estes Park, Colorado, August 2003.
3. J. Bacon, K. Moody, and W. Yao. Access Control and Trust in the Use of Widely Distributed Services. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Middleware, volume 2218 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 295-310, Heidelberg, November 2001. Springer.
4. J. Bacon, K. Moody, and W. Yao. A model of OASIS role-based access control and its support for active security. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 5(4):492-540, November 2002.
5. J. F. Barkley. Implementing Role Based Access Control using Object Technology. In First ACM Workshop on Role Based Access Control, November 1995.
6. J. F. Barkley, A. V. Cincotta, D. F. Ferraiolo, S. Gavrilla, and R. D. Kuhn, Role Based Access Control for the World Wide Web. In 20th National Information System Security Conference. NIST/NSA, 1997.
7. E. P. Bertino, P. A. Bonatti, and E. Ferrari. TRABC: A Temporal Role-Based Access Control Model. In 5th ACM Workshop on Role-based Access Control, Berlin, 2000.
8. R. Chandramouli. Application of XML Tools for Enterprise-Wide RBAC Implementation Task. In 5th ACM Workshop on Role-based Access Control, Berlin, 2000.
9. D. Ferraiolo and J. Barkley. Specifying and managing Role-Based Access Control within a Corporate Intranet. In 2nd ACM Workshop on Role-based Access Control, Berlin, 1997.
10. X. Gong and J. Newman. Selecting a Security Architecture for a New Model of Distributed Tutorial Support. In Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pages 89-94, Los Alamitos, CA, June 2002. Computer Society Press.
11. R. Hayton, J. Bacon, and K. Moody. OASIS: Access Control in an Open, Distributed Environment. In Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 3-14, Oakland CA, May 1998.
12. D. Laurillard. Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge, 1993.
13. J. Lee, F. Dineen, and J. McKendree. Supporting Student Discussions: It Isn't Just Talk. Education and Information Technologies, 3:217-229, 1998.
14. V. M., R. Govaerts, and J. Vandewalle. How Role Based Access Control is implemented in SESAME. In IEEE 6th WETICE, 1997.
15. J. Mayes. Learning Technology and Groundhog Day. In W. Strang, V. Simpson, and D. E. Slater, editors, Proceedings of Hypermedia at Work: Practice and Theory in Higher Education. University of Kent at Canterbury, 1995.
16. J. T. Mayes and I. Neilson. Learning from other people's dialogues: questions about computer-based answers. In B. B. Collis and G. Davies, editors, Innovative Adult Learning with Innovative Technologies, volume 1, pages 31-47. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1995.
17. T. Mayes and F. Dineen. Developing Tertiary Courseware through capturing Task Directed Discussions. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, Seattle, USA, 1999.
18. J. McKendree, K. Stenning, T. Mayes, J. Lee, and R. Cox. Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14:110-119, 1998.
19. R. Monthienvichienchai and M. A. Sasse. Learning from Others' Mistakes Through Computer Supported Vicarious Learning. In Proceedings of the 4th LTSN Conference, Galway, Ireland, August 2003.
20. J. Newman, T. Mayes, D. Benyon, S. Draper, P. Gray, A. Kilgour, and L. Mackinnon. Lessons from a Multi-university Remote Tutoring Community MANTCHI. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Role of Universities in the Future Information Society: The Virtual University. Flagstaff, Arizona, 1999.
21. R. Sandhu, D. Ferraiolo, and R. Kuhn. The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Role-based access control, pages 47-63, 2000.
22. R. S. Sandhu, E. J. Coyne, H. L. Feinstein, and C. E. Youman. Role Based Access Control Models. IEEE Computer, 29(2):38-47, 1996.
23. K. Stenning, J. McKendree, J. Lee, R. Cox, F. Dineen, and T. Mayes. Vicarious Learning from Educational Dialogue. In C. Hoadley and J. Roschelle, editors, Proceedings of Computer Support for Co-operative Learning: Designing New Media for a New Millenium, pages 341-347, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, December 1999.