Measuring progressive soft tissue change with nasoalveolar molding using a three-dimensional system

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1622-1625

  Simanca, Erika ^a,d   Morris, David ^b,c   Zhao, Linping ^a,c   Reisberg, David ^a   Viana, Grace ^b  

^a Division of Plastic Surgery   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Shriners Hospital for Children   (United States)

^d Craniofacial Center (MC 588)   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Cleft; Craniofacial; Nasoalveolar molding; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACE ASYMMETRY; HUMAN; INFANT; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PILOT STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANTHROPOMETRY; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PILOT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 80053497394     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8ca0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 3dMD System Web site 1999. Available at: http://www.3dmd.com. Accessed July 1, 2009
2. Kau CH, Richmond S, Incrapera A, et al. Three-dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007;3:9-110
3. Gor T, Kau CH, English J, et al. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137: 424-432
4. Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, et al. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D Camera System. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:507-518 (Pubitemid 39238039)
5. Singh GD, Levy-Bercowski D, Yanez MA, et al. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2004;10:161-166
6. Honrado C, Larrabee W Jr. Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12:327-333
7. Bishara S, Jorgensen G, Jakobsen J. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I. Methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:389-393
8. Farkas L. Anthropometric of the Head and Face. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1994
9. Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008;45:232-239 (Pubitemid 351778104)
10. Aldridge K, Boyadjiev S, Capone G, et al. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 2005;138A:247-253 (Pubitemid 41384241)
11. Da Silveira A, Martinez O, Da Silveira D, et al. Three-dimensional technology for documentation and record keeping for patients with facial clefts. Clin Plast Surg 2004;31:141-148 (Pubitemid 38638147)
12. Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, et al. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:486-498 (Pubitemid 29536380)
13. Maull DJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, et al. Long-term effects of nasoalveolar moulding on three-dimensional nasal shape in unilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:391-397 (Pubitemid 29434409)
14. Singh D, Levy-Bercowski D, Santiago P. Three-dimensional nasal changes following nasoalveolar molding in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: geometric morphometrics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005:42:403-409 (Pubitemid 40994535)
15. Kau CH, Zhurov A, Bibb R, et al. The investigation of the changing facial appearance of identical twins employing a three-dimensional laser imaging system. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005;8:85-90
16. Lübbers HT, Medinger L, Kruse A, et al. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:763-367
17. Krimmel M, Kluba S, Bacher M, et al. Digital surface photogrammetry for anthropometric analysis of the cleft infant face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:350-355 (Pubitemid 43787785)
18. Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tonomo T, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:38-50
19. Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:193-198 (Pubitemid 32467278)
20. Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y., Sakakibara A. Augmentation of the nostril splint for retaining the corrected contour of the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;85:182-186 (Pubitemid 20065464)
21. Pai B, Ko E, Huang C, et al. Symmetry of the nose after presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005;42:658-663 (Pubitemid 41579610)
22. Nakamura N, Sasaguri M, Nozoe E, et al. Postoperative nasal forms after presurgical pasoalveolar molding followed by medial-upward advancement of nasolabial components with vestibular expansion for children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2222-2231