Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial plastic surgery

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 327-331

  Honrado, Carlo P ^a   Larrabee Jr , Wayne F ^a  

^a Larrabee Center for Facial Plastic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Digital imaging; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST; ECHOGRAPHY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FACE SURGERY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LASER; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CEPHALOMETRY; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MOIRE TOPOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, PLASTIC; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 3242816156     PISSN: 10689508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000130578.12441.99     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Kokoska MS, Thomas JR: 35-mm and digital photography for the facial plastic surgeon. Fac Plast Surg Clin North Am 2000, 8:35-44.
2. Larrabee WF: Facial analysis for rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987, 20:653-674.
3. Nkenke E, Langer A, Laboureax X, et al.: Validation of in vivo assessment of facial soft-tissue volume changes and clinical application in midfacial distraction: a technical report. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 112:367-380. An excellent discussion of data acquisition with a 3D imager as well as determination of volumetric changes from changes that have undergone maxillofacial procedures.
4. Da Silveira AC, Daw JL, Kusnoto B, et al.: Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:449-456. An excellent description of 3D laser surface scanning in use for research and clinical practices. The benefits as well as the shortcomings are discussed.
5. Khambay B, Nebel J, Bowman J, et al.: 3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3D CT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002, 17:331-341.
6. Grayson B, Cutting C, Bookstein FL, et al.: The three-dimensional cephalogram: theory, technique, and clinical application. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988, 94:327-337.
7. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, et al.: Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002, 17:318-330.
8. Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, et al.: Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996, 11:225-233.
9. Xia J, Samman N, Yeung RWK, et al.: Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2000, 15:265-282.
10. Hell B: 3D sonography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995, 24:84-89.
11. Halazonetis DJ: Acquisition of 3-dimensional shapes and images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001, 119:556-560.
12. Hayashi K, Mizoguchi I, Mah J: Scanning facial surfaces with a three-dimensional laser scanner. J Clin Orthod 2003, 37:299-301. This paper discusses a modification in the use of a 3D scanner to avoid distortion when acquiring images.
13. McCance AM, Moss JP, Wright WR, et al.: A three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis of 16 skeletal class III patients following bimaxillary surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992, 30:221-232.
14. Moss JP, McCance AM, Fright WR, et al.: A three-dimensional soft-tissue analysis of fifteen patients with class II, division 1 malocclusions after bimaxillary surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994, 105:430-437.
15. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, et al.: The relationship between facial 3-d morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1997, 12:145-152.
16. Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, et al.: Quantification of facial morphology using stereophotogrammetry: demonstration of a new concept. J Dent 1996, 24:369-374.
17. Ayoub A, Garrahy A, Hood C, et al.: Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003, 40:523-529. Provides a comprehensive description of the authors' 3D imaging system and discusses possible sources of error in identifying landmarks.
18. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al.: Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: a computerized three-dimensional mesh diagram analysis. Clin Anat 2003, 16:420-433. An informative paper that discusses construction of a 3D mesh grid that can be used to study cross-sectional sets of gender and age groups.
19. Nute SJ, Moss JP: Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning. J Orthod 2000, 27:31-38.
20. Giovanoli P, Tzou CHJ, Plonner M, et al.: Three-dimensional video analysis of facial movements in healthy volunteers. Br J Plast Surg 2003, 56:644-652. This paper outlines the use of a video analysis system in acquiring normal data to determine the amount of movement during facial expressions.
21. Coulson SE, Croxson GR, Gilleard WL: Three-dimensional quantification of the symmetry of normal facial movement. Otol Neurotol 2002, 23:999-1002.
22. Gur RC, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, et al.: A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Methods 2002, 115:137-143.
23. Okada E: Three-dimensional facial simulations and measurements: changes of facial contour and units associated with facial expression. J Craniofac Surg 2001, 12:167-174.
24. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Dellavia C, et al.: A quantitative three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial asymmetry of cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14:739-746. By calculating 3D measurements, this study showed that adult patients who have had cleft lip and palate surgery have only moderately more asymmetry than a healthy reference population.
25. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Dellavia C, et al.: Three-dimensional nasal morphology in cleft lip and palate operated adult patients. Ann Plast Surg 2003, 51:390-397. This study discusses differences in nasal anatomy using 3D data.
26. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Dellavia C, et al.: A quantitative three-dimensional assessment of abnormal variations in facial soft tissues of adult patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003, 40:544-549. This paper outlines results showing that cleft lip and palate patients do not obtain a completely harmonious appearance after surgery.
27. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Tartaglia GM, et al.: Three-dimensional lip morphometry in adults operated on for cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003, 111:2149-2156. Comparing anatomic differences in patients operated on for cleft lip and palate, this study may help indicate where additional procedures are necessary to create a more normal-appearing lip.
28. Ji Y, Zhang F, Schwartz J, et al.: Assessment of facial tissue expansion with three-dimensional digitizer scanning. J Craniofac Surg 2002, 13:687-692.
29. Akazaki S, Nakagawa H, Kazama H, et al.: Age-related changes in skin wrinkles assessed by a novel three-dimensional morphometric analysis. Br J Dermatol 2002, 147:689-695.
30. Moss JP, Ismail SFH, Hennessy RJ: Three-dimensional assessment of treatment outcomes on the face. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003, 6(suppl 1):126-131. Provides shape analysis and facial morphology of a group of patients who did and did not undergo tooth extraction.
31. Ferrario VF, Serrao G, Ciusa V, et al.: Cephalometric and in vitro measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study. Angle Orthod 2002, 72:579-584.