-
1
-
-
0004077698
-
-
ASTM. Standard practice for estimating Thurstonian discriminal distances (E2262-03), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
ASTM. 2010a. Standard practice for estimating Thurstonian discriminal distances (E2262-03), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.08, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
(2010)
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
-
-
-
2
-
-
0004077698
-
-
ASTM. Standard test method for paired preference test (E2263-04), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
ASTM. 2010b. Standard test method for paired preference test (E2263-04), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.08, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
(2010)
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
-
-
-
3
-
-
0004077698
-
-
ASTM. Standard test method for sensory analysis-triangle test (E1885-04), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
ASTM. 2010c. Standard test method for sensory analysis-triangle test (E1885-04), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.08, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
-
(2010)
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
-
-
-
4
-
-
49549139345
-
The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph
-
BAMBER, D. 1975. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J. Math. Psychol. 12, 387-415.
-
(1975)
J. Math. Psychol.
, vol.12
, pp. 387-415
-
-
Bamber, D.1
-
5
-
-
41949083872
-
Replicated triangle and duo-trio tests: Discrimination capacity of assessors evaluated by Bayes' rule
-
BAYARRI, I., CARBONELL, L. and TARREGA, A. 2008. Replicated triangle and duo-trio tests: Discrimination capacity of assessors evaluated by Bayes' rule. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 519-523.
-
(2008)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.19
, pp. 519-523
-
-
Bayarri, I.1
Carbonell, L.2
Tarrega, A.3
-
6
-
-
84982934450
-
Difficulties and a way out: A Bayesian approach for sensory difference and preference tests
-
BI, J. 2003. Difficulties and a way out: A Bayesian approach for sensory difference and preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 21, 584-600.
-
(2003)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.21
, pp. 584-600
-
-
Bi, J.1
-
8
-
-
80053535539
-
Statistical analysis for R-index
-
BI, J. 2006b. Statistical analysis for R-index. J. Sens. Stud. 18, 1-18.
-
(2006)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.18
, pp. 1-18
-
-
Bi, J.1
-
9
-
-
34249793699
-
Bayesian analysis for proportion with an independent background effect
-
BI, J. 2007. Bayesian analysis for proportion with an independent background effect. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 60, 71-83.
-
(2007)
Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol.
, vol.60
, pp. 71-83
-
-
Bi, J.1
-
10
-
-
0034215929
-
Replicated difference and preference tests: How to account for inter-trial variation
-
BI, J., TEMPLETON-JANICK, L., ENNIS, J.M. and ENNIS, D.M. 2000. Replicated difference and preference tests: How to account for inter-trial variation. Food Qual. Prefer. 11, 269-273.
-
(2000)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.11
, pp. 269-273
-
-
Bi, J.1
Templeton-Janick, L.2
Ennis, J.M.3
Ennis, D.M.4
-
13
-
-
0141802297
-
The statistical power of replications in difference tests
-
BROCKHOFF, P.B. 2003. The statistical power of replications in difference tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 14, 405-417.
-
(2003)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.14
, pp. 405-417
-
-
Brockhoff, P.B.1
-
15
-
-
29144517380
-
Comparison of methods for analyzing replicated preference tests
-
COCHRANE, C.-Y.C., DUBNICKA, S. and LOUGHIN, T. 2005. Comparison of methods for analyzing replicated preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 20, 484-502.
-
(2005)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.20
, pp. 484-502
-
-
Cochrane, C.-Y.1
Dubnicka, S.2
Loughin, T.3
-
16
-
-
38749107603
-
Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of true discrimination rates in replicated triangle tests
-
DUINEVELD, K. and MEYNERS, M. 2008. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of true discrimination rates in replicated triangle tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 292-305.
-
(2008)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.19
, pp. 292-305
-
-
Duineveld, K.1
Meyners, M.2
-
17
-
-
84977734501
-
The power of sensory discrimination methods
-
ENNIS, D.M. 1993. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sens. Stud. 8, 353-370.
-
(1993)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.8
, pp. 353-370
-
-
Ennis, D.M.1
-
18
-
-
0032286392
-
The beta-binomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests
-
ENNIS, D.M. and BI, J. 1998. The beta-binomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 13, 389-412.
-
(1998)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.13
, pp. 389-412
-
-
Ennis, D.M.1
Bi, J.2
-
19
-
-
0003965487
-
-
2nd Ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
-
GACULA, M., SINGH, J., BI, J. and ALTAN, S. 2009. Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research, 2nd Ed., Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
-
(2009)
Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research
-
-
Gacula, M.1
Singh, J.2
Bi, J.3
Altan, S.4
-
20
-
-
46649102446
-
-
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
-
GHOSH, J.K., DELAMPADY, M. and SAMANTA, T. 2006. An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Theory and Methods, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
-
(2006)
An Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Theory and Methods
-
-
Ghosh, J.K.1
Delampady, M.2
Samanta, T.3
-
21
-
-
0020083498
-
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
-
HANLEY, J.A. and MCNEIL, B.J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29-36.
-
(1982)
Radiology
, vol.143
, pp. 29-36
-
-
Hanley, J.A.1
Mcneil, B.J.2
-
22
-
-
84991174047
-
The two-factor triangle test
-
HARRIES, J.M. and SMITH, G.L. 1982. The two-factor triangle test. J. Food Technol. 17, 153-162.
-
(1982)
J. Food Technol.
, vol.17
, pp. 153-162
-
-
Harries, J.M.1
Smith, G.L.2
-
24
-
-
0003414592
-
-
3rd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
-
JEFFREYS, H. 1961. Theory of Probability, 3rd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
-
(1961)
Theory of Probability
-
-
Jeffreys, H.1
-
27
-
-
18944394161
-
The beta-binomial model: Variability in overdispersion across methods and over time
-
LIGGETT, R.E. and DELWICHE, J.F. 2005. The beta-binomial model: Variability in overdispersion across methods and over time. J. Sens. Stud. 20, 48-61.
-
(2005)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.20
, pp. 48-61
-
-
Liggett, R.E.1
Delwiche, J.F.2
-
28
-
-
33947726367
-
Proper and improper use and interpretation of beta-binomial models in the analysis of replicated difference and preference tests
-
MEYNERS, M. 2007. Proper and improper use and interpretation of beta-binomial models in the analysis of replicated difference and preference tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 741-750.
-
(2007)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.18
, pp. 741-750
-
-
Meyners, M.1
-
29
-
-
0141620183
-
The design of replicated difference tests
-
MEYNERS, M. and BROCKHOFF, P.B. 2003. The design of replicated difference tests. J. Sens. Stud. 18, 291-324.
-
(2003)
J. Sens. Stud.
, vol.18
, pp. 291-324
-
-
Meyners, M.1
Brockhoff, P.B.2
-
30
-
-
34648836727
-
Approximating the distribution of discriminating rates in replicated difference tests using Bayes' rule
-
MEYNERS, M. and DUINEVELD, K. 2008. Approximating the distribution of discriminating rates in replicated difference tests using Bayes' rule. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 135-138.
-
(2008)
Food Qual. Prefer.
, vol.19
, pp. 135-138
-
-
Meyners, M.1
Duineveld, K.2
-
31
-
-
0002106182
-
A probability model for forced binary choice
-
MORRISON, D.G. 1978. A probability model for forced binary choice. Am. Stat. 32, 23-25.
-
(1978)
Am. Stat.
, vol.32
, pp. 23-25
-
-
Morrison, D.G.1
-
32
-
-
84891584621
-
-
Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.
-
NAES, T., BROCKHOFF, P.B. and TOMIC, O. 2010. Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science, Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.
-
(2010)
Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science
-
-
Naes, T.1
Brockhoff, P.B.2
Tomic, O.3
|