Modeling commuting mode choice jointly with work start time and work duration

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-47

  Nurul Habib, Khandker M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity based model; Commuting mode choice; Peak period travel demand; Travel demand management policy evaluation; Trivariate model; Work start time and duration

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GAS METAL ARC WELDING; TRAVEL TIME;

ACTIVITY BASED MODELING; COMMUTING MODES; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT; TRIVARIATE; WORK START TIME AND DURATION;

SCHEDULING;

COMMUTING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL DEMAND; WORKING CONDITIONS;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; TORONTO;

EID: 80053450223     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aptech Systems, 2006. GAUSS User's Manual. Maple Valley, CA.
2. Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system (ALBATROS). Transportation Research Part B 2004, 7:613-633.
3. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
4. Bhat C.R. A generalized multiple duration proportional hazard model with an application to activity behaviour during the evening work-to-home commute. Transportation Research Part B 1996, 30:465-480.
5. Bhat C.R. A model of post home arrival activity participation behaviour. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 32(6):384-400.
6. Bhat C.R. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 32(6):361-371.
7. Bhat C.R. Incorporating observed and unobserved heterogeneity in urban work travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Science 2000, 34(2):228-238.
8. Bhat C.R. Modelling the commuting activity-travel pattern of workers: formulation and empirical analysis. Transportation Science 2001, 35(1):61-79.
9. Bhat C.R., Eluru N. A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behaviour modeling. Transportation Research Part B 2009, 43(7):749-765.
10. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y., Srinivasan S., Sivakumar A. A comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns (CEMDEP). Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:57-66.
11. Bhat C.R., Singh S.K. A comprehensive daily activity-travel model system for workers. Transportation Research Part A 2000, 34(1):1-22.
12. Bhat C.R., Steed J. A continuous-time model choice for urban shopping trip. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36:207-224.
13. Data Management Group (DMG), 2008. Transportation Tomorrow Survey. Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto. , June 2009. http://www.jpint.utoronto.ca/dmg/tts.html.
14. Dubin J., McFadden D. An econometric analysis of residential electrical appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica 1984, 52:345-362.
15. Habib K.M.N., Miller E.J. Modelling workers' skeletal travel activity schedule. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1985:88-97.
16. Habib K.M.N., Day N., Miller E.J. Modelling joint trip timing and mode choice: lessons learned from Greater Toronto Area. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:639-653.
17. Hensher D.A., Mannering F.L. Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis. Transport Reviews 1994, 14(1):63-82.
18. Jara-Diaz S. The goods/activity framework for discrete travel choices: Indirect utility and value of time. Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges 2002, Elsevier Science Ltd. H.S. Mahmassani (Ed.).
19. Jara-Diaz S. On the goods-activities technical relations in the time allocation theory. Transportation 2003, 30:245-260.
20. Jara-Diaz, S. (2003b). Modelling activity duration and travel choice a common microeconomic framework. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, August 2003.
21. Johnson N.L., Kotz S., Balakrisnan N. Continuous Univariate Distributions 1994, vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
22. Keifer N.M. Econometric duration data and hazard function. Journal of Economic Literature 1988, XXVI:646-679.
23. Lee B., Timmermans H.J.P. A latent class accelerated hazard model of activity episode durations. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41:426-447.
24. Lee L.F. Notes and comments on generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 1983, 51(2):507-512.
25. Mayer M.D., Miller E.J. Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision Oriented Approach 2001, McGraw Hill.
26. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1973, Academic Press, New York. G.S. Zaremmbka (Ed.).
27. Miller E.J. An integrated framework of modelling short- and long-run household decision making. Progress in Activity Based Analysis 2005, Elsevier, New York. H.J.P. Timmermans (Ed.).
28. Munizaga M.A., Correia R., Jara-Diaz S., Ortuzar J.D. Valuing time with a joint mode choice-activity model. International Journal of Transport Economics 2006, XXXIII(2):193-210.
29. Munizaga M., Jara-Diaz S., Greeven P., Bhat C.R. Econometric calibration of the joint time assignment - mode choice model. Transportation Science 2008, 42(2):208-219.
30. Pendyala R.M., Bhat C.R. An exploration of relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activity. Transportation 2004, 31:429-456.
31. Pendyala R.M., Kitamura R., Kikuchi A., Yamamoto S., Fuji S. Florida activity mobility simulator (FAMOS): overview and preliminary validation results. Transportation Research Record 2005, 1921:123-130.
32. Roorda M.J., Miller E.J., Habib K.M.N. Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation. Transportation Research Part A 2008, 42:360-375.
33. Schmertmann C.P. Selectivity bias correction methods in polychotomous sample selection models. Journal of Econometrics 1994, 60:101-103.
34. Schwanen T., Dijst M. Time windows in workers' activity patters: empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Transportation 2003, 30:261-283.
35. Tommaso M.L.D. A trivariate model of participation, fertility and wages: the Italian case. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1999, 23:623-640.
36. Transport Canada Environmental Affairs, 2006. The cost of urban congestion in Canada.
37. Vovsha P., Bradley M. Hybrid discrete choice departure-time and duration model for scheduling travel tours. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:46-56.