Strategic corporate social responsibility: A 'dynamic capabilities' perspective

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 285-293

  Ramachandran, Venugopal ^a  

^a Institute for Financial Management and Research   (India)

Author keywords

Dynamic capabilities; Environment management capability; Impact assessment processes; Strategic CSR

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053426194     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.251     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amit R, Schoemaker PJH. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46.
2. Annamalai K, Rao S. 2003. ITC's e-choupal and profitable rural transformation. What works case study. World Resources Institute. Washington DC, USA.
3. Barney JB. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
4. Baron DP. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(4): 539-545.
5. Baron DP. 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10(1): 7-45.
6. Blyler M, Coff RW. 2003. Dynamic capabilities, social capital and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal 24: 677-686.
7. Clarkson M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20: 92-117.
8. Coleman JS. 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94: S95-S120.
9. Collis DJ, Montgomery CA. 1998. Corporate strategy - A resource-based approach. Irwin-McGraw Hill: New York.
10. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15(1): 1-13.
11. D'Aveni RA. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Free Press: New York, NY.
12. Day G. 1994. The capabilities of market driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 58: 37-52.
13. Dougherty D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3: 179-202.
14. Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1): 84-110.
15. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105-1121.
16. Falck O, Heblich S. 2007. Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons 50: 247-254.
17. Grant RM. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 3: 114-135.
18. Grant RM. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7(4): 375-387.
19. Hamel G, Prahalad CK. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review 68(2): 75-84.
20. Hart S. 1995. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20: 986-1014.
21. Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. 2000. Product sequencing: co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 961-979.
22. Henderson R, Cockburn I. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal 15: 63-84.
23. Heslin PA, Ochoa JD. 2008. Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility, Organizational Dynamics 37(2): 125-144.
24. Hillman AJ, Keim GD. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 125-139.
25. Husted BW, Salazar JJ. 2006. Taking Friedman seriously: maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies 43: 75 -91.
26. Kogut B, Zander U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3): 383-397.
27. Kohli AK, Jaworski B. 1990. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing 54: 1-18.
28. Leal GG, Fa MC, Pascola JV. 2003. Using environmental management systems to increase firms' competitiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(2): 101-110.
29. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 655-689.
30. Mackey A, Mackey TB, Barney JB. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review 32(3): 817-835.
31. Mario J, Maximiano B. 2007. A strategic integral approach (SIA) to institutionalizing CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(4): 231-242.
32. McGrath RG. MacMillan IC, Venkataraman S. 1995. Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal 16(4): 251-175.
33. McWilliams A, Siegel DS. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1): 117-127.
34. McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright P. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1): 1-17.
35. Mintzberg H, Raisinghani D, Theoret A. 1976. The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 246-275.
36. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
37. Peteraf MA. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 179-191.
38. Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12): 57-68.
39. Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2006. Strategy & society. Harvard Business Review 84(12): 78-92.
40. Porter ME. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press: New York, NY.
41. Porter ME. 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York, NY.
42. Portes A. 1998. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24.
43. Russo M, Fouts P. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534-59.
44. Sasse CM, Trahan RT. 2007. Rethinking the new corporate philanthropy. Business Horizons 50: 29-38.
45. Schaefer A. 2004. Corporate sustainability - integrating environmental and social concerns? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11(4): 179-187.
46. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533.
47. Upton DM, Fuller VA. 2004. The ITC eChoupal initiative. Case study No 0-404-16. Harvard Business School Publishing: Boston, MA.
48. Weick KE. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
49. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sense making. Organization Science 16(4): 409-421.
50. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
51. Wilcke RW. 2004. An appropriate ethical model for business and a critique of Milton Friedman's thesis. Independent Review 9(2): 187-200.