Rethinking the new corporate philanthropy

Business Horizons

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-38

  Sasse, Craig M ^a   Trahan, Ryan T ^b  

^a ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kaplan Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate citizenship; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate strategy; Social responsibility; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845589575     PISSN: 00076813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bainbridge S.M. In defense of the shareholder wealth maximization norm: A reply to Professor Green. Washington and Lee Law Review 50 4 (1993) 1423-1447
2. Bainbridge S.M. Director primacy: The means and ends of corporate governance. Northwestern University Law Review 97 2 (2003) 547-606
3. Bakan J.A. The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power (2004), Free Press, New York
4. Bhattacharya C.B., and Sen S. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47 1 (2004) 9-16
5. Buffett, W. E. (2003). Berkshire Hathaway annual report. Retrieved from http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2003ar/2003ar.pdf.
6. Coase R.H. The firm, the market, and the law (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
7. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., No. 47 (Supreme Court of Michigan, February 7, 1919).
8. Drucker P. The essential Drucker (2001), HarperBusiness, New York
9. Easterbrook F.H., and Fischel D.R. The corporate contract. Columbia Law Review 89 7 (1989) 1416-1448
10. Finding strategic corporate citizenship: A new game theoretic view. Harvard Law Review 117 6 (2004) 1957-1980
11. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (1984), Pitman, Boston
12. Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 33 (1970, September 13) 122-126
13. Gerstner L. Who says elephants can't dance? (2002), HarperBusiness, New York
14. Gevurtz F.A. The historical and political origins of the corporate board of directors. Hofstra Law Review 33 1 (2004) 89-173
15. Godfrey P. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review 30 4 (2005) 777-798
16. Greenfield K. Democracy and the dominance of Delaware in corporate law. Journal Law and Contemporary Problems 67 4 (2004) 101-111
17. Hamill S.P. From special privilege to general utility: A continuation of Willard Hurst's study of corporations. American University Law Review 49 1 (1999) 81-180
18. Hood, J. (1998). Do corporations have social responsibilities? The Freeman, 48(11). Retrieved from http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=3702.
19. Kanter R.M. From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review 77 3 (1999) 122-132
20. Kantola Productions (Producer). (2004). Doing well and doing good [Stanford executive briefings DVD video]. (Available from Kantola Productions, 55 Sunnyside Avenue, Mill Valley, CA 94941-1935.)
21. Matten D., and Crane A. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 30 1 (2005) 166-179
22. McClenahen J.S. Defining social responsibility. Industry Week 254 3 (2005) 64-65
23. Micklethwait J., and Wooldridge A. The company: A short history of a revolutionary idea (2003), Modern Library, New York
24. Porter M.E., and Kramer M.R. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80 12 (2002) 57-68
25. Post J.E., Preston L.E., and Sachs S. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth (2002), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
26. Smith C. The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 72 3 (1994) 105-116
27. Sternberg E. Just business (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
28. Walsh J. Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review 30 2 (2005) 426-452
29. Wilcke, R. W. (2004). An appropriate ethical model for business and a critique of Milton Friedman's thesis. Independent Review, 9(2), 187-209.