A decision-based approach to rhetorical parsing

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1999-June, Issue , 1999, Pages 365-372

  Marcu, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

ACTION SEQUENCES; DECISION-BASED; DISCOURSE PARSERS; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; LEARN+; LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE; PARSING ALGORITHM; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF TEXTS; SEMANTICS KNOWLEDGE;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85149129741     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Eric Brill. 1995. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4):543-565.
2. Simon H. Corston-Oliver. 1998. Beyond string matching and cue phrases: Improving efficiency and coverage in discourse analysis. The AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent TextSummarization, pages 9-15.
3. Dan Cristea and Bonnie L. Webber. 1997. Expectations in incremental discourse processing. In Proceedings ofACL/EACL'97, pages 88-95.
4. Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.
5. Marti A. Hearst. 1997. TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics, 23(1):33-64.
6. Ulf Hermjakob and Raymond J. Mooney. 1997. Learning parse and translation decisions from examples with rich context. In Proceedings of ACI_,/EACL'97, pages 482-489.
7. LynetteHirschman and Nancy Chinchor, 1997. MUC-7 Coreference TaskDefinition.
8. Sadao Kurohashi and Makoto Nagao. 1994. Automatic detection of discourse structure by checking surface information in sentences. In Proceedings of COL-ING'94, volume 2, pages 1123-1127.
9. David M. Magerman. 1995. Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. In Proceedings ofACL'95, pages 276-283.
10. William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243-281.
11. Daniel Marcu. 1997. The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts. In Proceedings ofACL/EACL'97, pages 96-103.
12. Daniel Marcu. 1999. Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in text. In Inderjeet Mani and Mark Maybury, editors, Advances in Automatic Text Sum-marization. The MIT Press. To appear.
13. Daniel Marcu, Estibaliz Amorrortu, and Magdalena Romera. 1999. Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. The ACL'99 Workshop on Standards and Toolsfor Discourse Tagging.
14. Seiji Miike, Etsuo Itoh, Kenji Ono, and Kazuo Sumita. 1994. A full-text retrieval system with a dynamic abstract generation function. In Proceedings of SI-GIR'94, pages 152-161.
15. David D. Palmer and Marti A. Hearst. 1997. Adaptive multilingual sentence boundary disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 23(2):241-269.
16. J. Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
17. R.F. Simmons and Yeong-Ho Yu. 1992. The acquisition and use of context-depefident grammars for English. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):391-418.
18. K. Sumita, K. Ono, T. Chino, T. Ukita, and S. Amano. 1992. A discourse structure analyzer for Japanese text. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, volume 2, pages 1133-1140.