Ancilla-based quantum simulation

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Brown, Katherine L ^a   De, Suvabrata ^a   Kendon, Vivien M ^a   Munro, William J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b Kashino Diverse Brain Research Laboratory of NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCILLA; CONTINUOUS VARIABLES; LOW-TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; NEAREST-NEIGHBOUR; PHASE ESTIMATION ALGORITHMS; QUANTUM SIMULATIONS; TIME STEP;

PENETRATION DEPTH (SUPERCONDUCTIVITY); QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; QUANTUM COMPUTERS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 80053411575     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/095007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Shor P W 1997 Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer SIAM J. Comput. 26 1484-509 (Pubitemid 127613100)
2. Feynman R P 1982 Simulating physics with computers Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467-88
3. Lloyd S 1996 Universal quantum simulators Science 273 1073-8 (Pubitemid 26278158)
4. Aspuru-Guzik A, Dutoi A D, Love P J and Head-Gordon M 2005 Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies Science 309 1704-7 (Pubitemid 41285935)
5. Yu Smirnov A, Savel'ev S, Mourokh L G and Nori F 2007 Modelling chemical reactions using semiconductor quantum dots Europhys. Lett. 80 67008
6. Abrams D S and Lloyd S 1999 Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 5162
7. Brown K L, Munro W J and Kendon V M 2010 Using quantum computers for quantum simulation Entropy 12 2268-307
8. De Raedt K, Michielsen K, De Raedt H, Trieu B, Arnold G, Richter M, Lippert Th, Watanabe H and Ito N 2007 Massive parallel quantum computer simulator Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 121-36 (Pubitemid 44908284)
9. Verstraete F, Porras D and Cirac J I 2004 Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: a quantum information perspective Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 227205
10. Bardeen J, Cooper L N and Schrieffer J R 1957 Theory of superconductivity Phys. Rev. 108 1175
11. Richardson R W and Sherman N 1964 Exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian Nucl. Phys. 52 221-38
12. Anderson PW1958 Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity Phys. Rev. 112 1900-16
13. Giorgini S, Pitaevskii L P and Stringari S 2008 Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1215-74
14. Dean D J and JensenMH 2003 Pairing in nuclear systems: from neutron stars to finite nuclei Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 607-56 (Pubitemid 36719931)
15. Mastellone A, Falci G and Fazio R 1998 Small superconducting grain in the canonical ensemble Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 4542-5 (Pubitemid 128622015)
16. Volya A, Brown A B and Zelevinsky V 2001 Exact solution of the nuclear pairing problem Phys. Lett. B 509 37-42 (Pubitemid 32538951)
17. Dukelsky J and Sierra G 1999 Density matrix renormalization group study of ultrasmall superconducting grains Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 172-5 (Pubitemid 129690082)
18. Ho S Y, Rowe D J and De Baerdemacker S 2010 Eigenstate estimation for the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) Hamiltonian arXiv:1011.4304
19. Wu L-A, Byrd M S and Lidar D A 2002 Polynomial-time simulation of pairing models on a quantum computer Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 057904
20. Cleve R, Ekert A, Macchiavello C and Mosca M 1998 Quantum algorithms revisited Proc. Roy. Soc. A 454 339
21. van Loock P, Munro W J, Nemoto K, Spiller T P, Ladd T D, Braunstein S L and Milburn G J 2008 Hybrid quantum computation in quantum optics Phys. Rev. A 78 022303
22. Spiller T P, Nemoto K, Braunstein S L, MunroWJ, van Loock P and Milburn G J 2006 Quantum computation by communication New J. Phys. 8 30
23. Brown K R, Clark R J and Chuang I L 2006 Limitations of quantum simulation examined by a pairing Hamiltonian using nuclear magnetic resonance Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 050504
24. Rodrigues D A, Jarvis C E A, Gyorffy B L, Spiller T P and Annett J F 2008 Entanglement of superconducting charge qubits by homodyne measurement J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 075211
25. Trotter H F 1959 On the product of semi-groups of operators Proc. Am. Math. Phys. 10 545
26. Suzuki M 1993 Improved Trotter-like formula Phys. Lett. A 180 232-4
27. Brown K L 2011 Using the qubus for quantum computing PhD Thesis University of Leeds
28. Louis S G R, Nemoto K, Munro W J and Spiller T P 2007 The efficiencies of generating cluster states with weak nonlinearities New J. Phys. 9 193
29. NielsenMA and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
30. Barenco A, Bennett C H, Cleve R, DiVincenzo D P, Margolus N, Shor P, Sleator T, Smolin J A andWeinfurter H 1995 Elementary gates for quantum computation Phys. Rev. A 52 3457-67
31. Anders J, Oi D K L, Kashefi E, Browne D E and Andersson E 2010 Ancilla-driven universal quantum computation Phys. Rev. A 82 020301
32. Horsman C, Brown K L, Munro W J and Kendon V M 2011 Reduce, reuse, recycle for robust cluster-state generation Phys. Rev. A 83 042327