Prosodic Correlates of Rhetorical Relations

HLT-NAAC 2006 - Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech, ACTS 2006 - Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-7

  Murray, Gabriel ^a   Taboada, Maite ^b   Renals, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

MEETINGS RECORDINGS; MULTI-CLASS CLASSIFICATION; PAIRWISE CLASSIFICATION; PILOT STUDIES; PROSODIC FEATURES; PROSODICS; RHETORICAL RELATIONS; SUPPORT VECTORS MACHINE; TRAINING METHODS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 80053390038     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. N. Asher and A. Lascarides. 2004. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, GB.
2. S. Corston-Oliver. 1998. Computing representations of the structure of written discourse. Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Barbara.
3. H. den Ouden. 2004. The Prosodic Realization of Text Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.
4. A. Janin, D. Baron, J. Edwards, D. Ellis, D. Gelbart, N. Morgan, B. Peskin, T. Pfau, E. Shriberg, A. Stolcke, and C. Wooters. 2003. The ICSI meeting corpus. In Proceedings of IEEE ICASSP 2003, Hong Kong, China.
5. Alistair Knott and Robert Dale. 1996. Choosing a set of coherence relations for text-generation: a data-driven approach. In Giovanni Adorni and Michael Zock, editors, Trends in natural language generation: an artificial intelligence perspective, pages 47-67. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
6. A. Knott and T. Sanders. 1998. The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30:135-175.
7. William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3):243-281.
8. D. Marcu and A. Echihabi. 2002. An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In The Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA.
9. D. Marcu. 1997. From discourse structures to text summaries. In The Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, Madrid, Spain, pages 82-88.
10. D. Marcu. 1999. A decision-based approach to rhetorical parsing. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Maryland, USA, pages 365-372.
11. D. Marcu. 2000. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: A surface-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):395-448.
12. J. Moore and M. Pollack. 1992. A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):537-544.
13. L. Noordman, I. Dassen, M. Swerts, and J. Terken. 1999. Prosodic markers of text structure. In K. Van Hoek, A. Kibrik, and L. Noordman, editors, Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, pages 133-149. John Benjamins Publications, Amsterdam, NL.
14. E. Shriberg, R. Dhillon, S. Bhagat, J. Ang, and H. Carvey. - 2004. The ICSI meeting recorder dialog act (MRDA) corpus. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Cambridge, MA, USA, pages 97-100.
15. C. Sporleder and A. Lascarides. to appear, 2006. Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: An assessment. Natural Language Engineering.
16. M. Taboada. 2004. Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. John Benjamins Publications, Amsterdam, NL.