Dynamic-mechanical behavior of polyethylenes and ethene-/α-olefin-copolymers: Part III. γ-relaxation

Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2057-2063

  Stadler, Florian J ^a,b  

^a Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Relaxation; Activation Energy; Dynamic mechanical Properties; Ethylene olefin copolymer; Polyethylene

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053376719     PISSN: 02561115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-011-0080-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. F. C. Stehling and L. Mandelkern, Macromolecules, 3(2), 242 (1970).
2. G. Hartwig, Polymer properties at room and cryogenic temperatures, New York, Plenum Press (1994).
3. K. Illers, Coll. Polym. Sci., 251, 394 (1973).
4. K. Illers, Coll. Polym. Sci., 252, 1 (1974).
5. Y. Khanna, E. Turi, T. Taylor, V. Vickroy and R. Abbott, Macromolecules, 18, 1302 (1985).
6. R. G. Matthews, A. P. Unwin, I. M. Ward and G. Capaccio, Journal of Macromolecular Science-Physics, B38, 1-2, 123 (1999).
7. S. D. Clas, D. C. McFaddin and K. E. Russell, J. Polym. Sci. Part B-Polym. Phys., 25, 5, 1057 (1987).
8. K. Jordens, G. L. Wilkes, J. Janzen, D. C. Rohlfing and M. B. Welch, Polymer, 41, 19, 7175 (2000).
9. M. L. Cerrada, R. Benavente, B. Pena and E. Perez, Polymer, 41, 15, 5957 (2000).
10. K. H. Nitta and A. Tanaka, Polymer, 42, 1219 (2001).
11. C. L. P. Shan, J. B. P. Soares and A. Penlidis, Polymer, 43, 3, 767 (2002).
12. R. Benavente, E. Perez, M. Yazdani-Pedram and R. Quijada, Polymer, 43, 25, 6821 (2002).
13. R. H. Boyd, Polymer, 26, 323 (1985).
14. I. M. Ward and D. W. Hadley, The yield behaviour of polymers, In Sons, J. W., Ed., Polymer, Chichester, England, 11, 213 (1993).
15. R. Boyer, Rubber Chem. Technol., 34, 1303 (1963).
16. T. Shatzki, J. Polym. Sci., 57, 496 (1962).
17. R. H. Boyd, Polymer, 26, 1123 (1985).
18. F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Polymer, 46(23), 10311 (2005).
19. F. J. Stadler, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(3), 954 (2011).
20. F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Macromolecules, 41(4), 1328 (2008).
21. J. A. Resch, F. J. Stadler, J. Kaschta and H. Münstedt, Macromolecules, 42(15), 5676 (2009).
22. F. S. Bates, J. H. Rosedale and G. H. Fredrickson, J. Chem. Phys., 92(10), 6255 (1990).
23. K. Almdal, F. S. Bates and K. Mortensen, J. Chem. Phys., 96(12), 9122 (1992).
24. F. J. Stadler, Express Polym. Lett., 5(4), 327 (2011).
25. U. Gaur and B. Wunderlich, Macromolecules, 13(6), 1618 (1980).
26. L. Leibler, Macromolecules, 13(6), 1602 (1980).
27. E. Laredo, N. Suarez, A. Bello and L. Marquez, J. Polym. Sci. Part B-Polym. Phys., 34(4), 641 (1996).
28. E. Laredo, N. Suarez, A. Bello, B. R. d. Gascue, M. A. Gomez and J. M. G. Fatou, Polymer, 40, 6405 (1999).
29. S. Bensason, S. Nazarenko, S. Chum, A. Hiltner and E. Baer, Polymer, 38, 14, 3513 (1997).
30. F. J. Stadler, T. Takahashi and K. Yonetake, e-Polymers, 40 (2009).
31. F. J. Stadler, T. Takahashi and K. Yonetake, e-Polymers, 41 (2009).
32. B. S. Tanem and A. Stori, Polymer, 42, 6609 (2001).
33. S. Głowinkowski, M. Makrocka-Rydzyk, S. Wanke and S. Jurga, European Polymer Journal, 38, 5, 961 (2002).
34. Most of the activation energies determined were significantly larger than the value of 38 kJ/mol reported by Głowinkowski et al. [33]and Hartwig [2]. The reason for these differences might lie in the measurement method, as both groups determined the activation energy by NMR, which seems not to produce comparable results with dynamic-mechanical measurements due to the different length scales being analyzed (see also part II of this series [19]).
35. R. Popli, M. Glotin and L. Mandelkern, J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys., 407 (1983).