A virtual excavation: Combining 3D immersive virtual reality and geophysical surveying

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6939 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2011, Pages 229-238

  Lin, Albert Yu Min ^a   Novo, Alexandre ^b   Weber, Philip P ^a   Morelli, Gianfranco ^b   Goodman, Dean ^c   Schulze, Jürgen P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Geostudi Astier   (Italy)

^c Geophysical Archaeometry Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3-D SPACE; ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE; DATA SETS; DATA TYPE; ELEVATION MAPS; GEO-SPATIAL; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYING; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SURVEY; IMMERSIVE; IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY; MULTI-LAYERED; NON-INVASIVE; POINT CLOUD; ULTRAHIGH RESOLUTION;

GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; GEOPHYSICS; GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 80053375044     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24031-7_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Watters, M.S.: Gpr: a tool for archaeological management. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2004, pp. 811-815 (2004)
2. Becker, H.: From nanotesla to picotesla-a new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 2, 217-228 (1995)
3. Aitken, M.J.: Magnetic prospecting. i. the water newton survey. Archaeometry 1, 24-26 (1958)
4. Frohlich, B., Lancaster, W.: Electromagnetic surveying in current middle eastern archaeology: Application and evaluation. Geophysics 51, 1414-1425 (1986)
5. Tabbagh, A.: Applications and advantages of the slingram electromagnetic method for archaeological prospecting. Geophysics 51, 576-584 (1986)
6. Abu Zeid, N., Balkov, E., Chemyakina, M., Manstein, A., Manstein, Y., Morelli, G., Santarato, G.: Multi-frequency electromagnetic sounding tool EMS. Archaeological discoveries. Case stories. In: EGS - AGU - EUG Joint Assembly, Nice, France, vol. 5 (2003)
7. Novo, A., Grasmueck, M., Viggiano, D., Lorenzo, H.: 3D GPR in archaeology:What can be gained from dense data acquisition and processing. In: Twelfth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (2008)
8. Goodman, D., Nishimura, Y., Rogers, J.: GPR time slices in archaeological prospection. Archaeological prospection 2, 85-89 (1995)
9. Davis, J., Annan, A.: Ground penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting 37, 531-551 (1989)
10. Watters, M.S.: Geovisualization: an example from the catholme ceremonial complex. Archaeological Prospection 13, 282-290 (2006)
11. Nuzzo, L., Leucci, G., Negri, S., Carrozzo, M., Quarta, T.: Application of 3d visualization techniques in the analysis of gpr data for archaeology. Annals Of Geophysics 45, 321-337 (2009)
12. Grasmueck, M., Weger, R., Horstmeyer, H.: Full-resolution 3d gpr imaging. Geophysics 70, K12-K19 (2005)
13. DeFanti, T.A., Dawe, G., Sandin, D.J., Schulze, J.P., Otto, P., Girado, J., Kuester, F., Smarr, L., Rao, R.: The starcave, a third-generation cave and virtual reality optiportal. Future Generation Computer Systems 25, 169-178 (2009)
14. GeoScience, M.: Windows based acquisition and visualization software (2010), http://www.idswater.com/water/us/mala-geoscience/data-acquisition- software/85-0/g-supplier-5.html
15. Instruments, A.: Easy 3D - GPR Visualization Software (2010), http://www. aegis-instruments.com/products/brochures/easy-3d-gpr.html
16. Halliburton: GeoProbe Volume Interpretation Software
17. Ropinski, T., Steinicke, F., Hinrichs, K.: Visual exploration of seismic volume datasets. In: Journal Proceedings of the 14th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG 2006), vol. 14 (2006)
18. Chopra, P., Meyer, J., Fernandez, A.: Immersive volume visualization of seismic simulations: A case study of techniques invented and lessons learned. IEEE Visualization (2002)
19. Winkler, C., Bosquet, F., Cavin, X., Paul, J.: Design and implementation of an immersive geoscience toolkit. IEEE Visualization (1999)
20. Froehlich, B., Barrass, S., Zehner, B., Plate, J., Goebel, M.: Exploring geo-scientific data in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization 1999. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)
21. LaFayette, C., Parke, F., Pierce, C., Nakamura, T., Simpson, L.: Atta texana leafcutting ant colony: a view underground. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 talks. ACM, New York (2008)
22. Billen, M., Kreylos, O., Hamann, B., Jadamec, M., Kellogg, L., Staadt, O.D.: A geoscience perspective on immersive 3d gridded data visualization, vol. 34. Computers & Geosciences
23. Leckebusch, J.: Ground-penetrating radar: a modern three-dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection 10, 213-240 (2003)
24. Linford, N.: From hypocaust to hyperbola: ground-penetrating radar surveys over mainly Roman remains in the UK. Archaeological Prospection 11, 237-246 (2004)
25. OpenSceneGraph: Scenegraph based graphics library (2004), http://www. openscenegraph.org
26. Orthmann, J., Keller, M., Kolb, A.: Integrating GPGPU Functionality into Scene Graphs. Vision Modeling Visualization (2009)