Geovisualization: An example from the catholme ceremonial complex

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 282-290

  Watters, Margaret S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ceremonial complex; Data fusion; Geophysical survey; Isosurfacing; Neolithic early Bronze Age; Virtual reality; Visualization

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846310004     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/arp.290     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Annan A, Brewster M, Greenhouse J, Regman J, Schneider G, Olhoeft G, Sander K. 1992. Geophysical monitoring of DNAPL migration in a sandy aquifer. Abstract, Technical Program, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Annual International Meeting, New Orleans, 25-29 October: 344-347.
2. Buteux S, Hewson M. 2004. A gazetteer and synthesis of the archaeology of the Full Area. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase I Report, Report 1, English Heritage: London.
3. Buteux S, Gaffney V, White R, van Leusen M. 2000. Wroxeter Hinterland Project and geophysical survey at Wroxeter. Archaeological Prospection 7: 69-80.
4. Cardarelli E, Godio A, Morelli G, Sambuelli L, Santarato G, Socco L. 2002. Integrated geophysical surveys to investigate the Scarsella vault of St. John's Baptistery Florence. The Leading Edge May: 467-470.
5. Cunliffe B. 2003. Danebury Hillfort. Tempus Publishing Ltd.
6. Daniels JJ, Vendl M, Holt J, Guy E. 2003. Combining multiple geophysical data sets into a single 3D image, Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, Proceedings of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, April 6-10.
7. Drahor M, Göktürkler G, Berge M, Kurtulmus Ö. 2005. Resistivity inversion methods in Archaeological prospection and its importance. 6th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Proceedings Extended Abstract, Rome.
8. Gaffney C, Gater J, Linford P, Gaffney V, White R. 2000. Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the Roman city of Wroxeter. Archaeological Prospection 7: 81-99.
9. Goodman D, Nishimura Y, Hongo H, Okita M. 1997. 3-D GPR amplitude rendering of the Saitobaru Burial Mound #13. In Filtering, Optimisation and Modelling of Geophysical Data in Archaeological Prospecting. Fondazione Carlo Maurilio Lerici, Politecnico di Milano 50th Anniversary Issue: 93-101.
10. Goodman D, Nishimura Y, Hongo, H, Okita M. 1998. GPR amplitude rendering in archaeology. GPR'98, Seventh International Conference on Ground penetrating Radar, Lawrence, Kansas; 91-92.
11. Houndslow M, Karloukovski K. 2005. Where Rivers Meet: landscape, ritual and settlement and the archaeology of river gravels. Report for Magnetic Properties. Report 4, English Heritage: London.
12. Jordan D. 2005. Where Rivers Meet: landscape, ritual and settlement and the archaeology of river gravels. The Geoarchaeology of Deposits at Catholme. Report 3, English Heritage: London.
13. Kvamme K. 2001. Archaeological prospection in fortified Great Plains villages: new insights through data fusion, visualization, and testing. In Archaeological Prospection: 4th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Doneus Integrating Multidimensional Geophysical Data, Eder-Hinterleitner A, Neubauer W (eds). Austrian Academy of Sciences Press: Vienna; 141-143.
14. Kvamme K. 2003. Geophysical surveys as landscape archaeology. American Antiquity 68: (3): 435-457.
15. Kvamme K. 2006. Integrating multidimensional geophysical data. Archaeological Prospection 13: 57-72.
16. Leckebusch J. 2000. Two- and three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar surveys across a medieval choir: a case study in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 7: 189-200.
17. Leckebusch J. 2003. Ground penetrating radar: a modern three-dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection 10: 213-240.
18. Leckebusch J, Peikert R. 2001. Investigating the true resolution and three-dimensional capabilities of ground-penetrating radar data in archaeological surveys: measurements in a sand box. Archaeological Prospection 8: 29-40.
19. Leckebusch J, Peikert R, Hauser M. 2001. Advances in 3D visualization of georadar data. Fourth International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Vienna, 143-144.
20. Lyall J, Powlesland D. 1996. The application of high resolution fluxgate gradiometery as an aid to excavation planning and strategy formulation. Internet Archaeology 1(Autumn), ISSN 1363-5387, http://intarch.ac.uk/ journal/issue1/1yall_index.html.
21. Neubauer W, Eder-Hinterleitner A. 1997. Resistivity and magnetics of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria: an example of combined interpretation of prospection data. Archaeological Prospection 4: 179-189.
22. Neubauer W, Eder-Hinterleitner A, Seren S, Melichr P. 2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: an approach for archaeological Interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection 9: 135-156.
23. Papadopoulos N, Tsourlos P, Tsokas G, Sarris A. 2005. 2D and 3D inversion of electrical resistivity tomography data collected from archaeological sites. Extended Abstract, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Rome.
24. Piro S, Mauriello P, Cammarano F. 2000. Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection. Archaeological Prospection 7: 203-213.
25. Watters M. 2004. Multi-technique geophysical survey of the monuments in the focus area. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase I Report. Report 4, English Heritage: London.
26. Watters M. 2005. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund: Where Rivers Meet geophysical survey at Catholme. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase II Report. Report 2, English Heritage: London.
27. Zhurbin I, Malyugin D. 1998. On the method of visualization of electrometric data. Archaeological Prospection 5: 73-79.