Sentiment retrieval using generative models

COLING/ACL 2006 - EMNLP 2006: 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 345-354

  Eguchi, Koji ^a   Lavrenko, Victor ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

CRITICAL FUNCTIONS; GENERATIVE MODEL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL MODELS; MODEL PARAMETERS; PROBABILISTIC LANGUAGE; RELEVANCE MODELS; TOPIC RELEVANCE; TRAINING DATA;

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 80053371541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610124     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. James Allan, Courtney Wade, and Alvaro Bolivar. 2003. Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. In Proc. of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, pages 314-321, Toronto, Canada.
2. Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees. 2004. Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. In Proc. of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, pages 25-32, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
3. Sanjiv R. Das and Mike Y. Chen. 2001. Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment parsing from small talk on the Web. In Proc. of the 2001 European Finance Association Annual Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
4. Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence, and David M. Pennock. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proc. of the 12th International Conference on the World Wide Web, pages 519-528, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Charlotta Engström. 2004. Topic dependence in sentiment classification. Master's thesis, University of Cambridge.
6. Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou and Kathleen R. McKeown. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proc. of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 174-181, Madrid, Spain.
7. Minqing Hu and Bing Liu. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proc. of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 168-177, Seattle, USA.
8. Jaap Kamps and Maarten Marx. 2002. Words with attitude. In Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Global WordNet, pages 332-341, Mysore, India.
9. Soo-Min Kim and Eduard Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Geneva, Czech Republic.
10. Soo-Min Kim, Deepak Ravichandran, and Eduard Hovy. 2004. ISI Novelty Track system for TREC 2004. In Proc. of the 13th Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publication 500-261.
11. Robert Krovetz. 1993. Viewing morphology as an inference process. In Proc. of the 16th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, pages 191-202, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
12. Victor Lavrenko andW. Bruce Croft. 2001. Relevance-based language models. In Proc. of the 24th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference, pages 120-127, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
13. David E. Losada. 2005. Language modeling for sentence retrieval: A comparison between multiple-Bernoulli and multinomial models. In Information Retrieval and Theory Workshop, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
14. Vanessa Murdock and W. Bruce Croft. 2005. A translation model for sentence retrieval. In Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, pages 684-691, Vancouver, Canada.
15. Tetsuya Nasukawa and Jeonghee Yi. 2003. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pages 70-77, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA.
16. Kamal Nigam and Matthew Hurst, 2005. Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, chapter Towards a Robust Metric of Opinion. Springer.
17. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proc. of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 79-86, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
18. Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proc. of the 21st Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference, pages 275-281, Melbourne, Australia.
19. James Shanahan, Yan Qu, and Janyce Wiebe, editors. 2005. Computing attitude and affect in text. Springer.
20. B. W. Silverman, 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, pages 75-94. CRC Press.
21. Ian Soboroff and Donna Harman. 2003. Overview of the TREC 2003 Novelty Track. In Proc. of the 12th Text Retrieval Conference, pages 38-53. NIST Special Publication 500-255.
22. Ian Soboroff. 2004. Overview of the TREC 2004 Novelty Track. In Proc. of the 13th Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publication 500-261.
23. Fei Song and W. Bruce Croft. 1999. A general language model for information retrieval. In Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 316-321, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
24. Philip J. Stone, Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, and Daniel M. Ogilvie. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press.
25. Peter D. Turney and Michael L. Littman. 2003. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(4):315-346.
26. Peter D. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 417-424, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
27. Janyce Wiebe, Theresa Wilson, and Claire Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 1(2):0-0.
28. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, Canada.
29. Jeonghee Yi, Tetsuya Nasukawa, Razvan Bunescu, and Wayne Niblack. 2003. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 427- 434, Melbourne, Florida, USA.
30. Chengxiang Zhai and John Lafferty. 2001. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proc. of the 24th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference, pages 334-342, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
31. Chengxiang Zhai. 2002. Risk Minimization and Language Modeling in Text Retrieval. PhD dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.