Chromosomal aberrations as detected by array comparative genomic hybridization in early low-grade intraepithelial neoplasias of the breast

Histopathology

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 549-555

  Stacher, Elvira ^a   Boldt, Vivien ^b   Leibl, Sebastian ^a   Halbwedl, Iris ^a   Popper, Helmut H ^a   Ullmann, Reinhard ^b   Tavassoli, Fattaneh A ^c   Moinfar, Farid ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Array CGH; Early breast neoplasia; Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia; Flat epithelial atypia; Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CHROMOSOME 14Q; CHROMOSOME 16Q; CHROMOSOME 17P; CHROMOSOME 19P; CHROMOSOME 1Q; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; LASER CAPTURE MICRODISSECTION; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRECANCER AND CANCER-IN-SITU; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY;

EID: 80053307108     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: 13652559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03918.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Moinfar F, Man YG, Bratthauer GL, Ratschek M, Tavassoli FA. Genetic abnormalities in mammary ductal intraepithelial neoplasia-flat type ('clinging ductal carcinoma in situ'): a simulator of normal mammary epithelium. Cancer 2000; 88; 2072-2081.
2. Dabbs DJ, Carter G, Fudge M et al. Molecular alterations in columnar cell lesions of the breast. Mod. Pathol. 2006; 19; 344-349.
3. Simpson PT, Gale T, Reis-Filho JS et al. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: the missing link in breast cancer progression? A morphological and molecular analysis Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29; 734-746.
4. Fernandez-Aguilar S, Simon P, Buxant F, Simonart T, Noel JC. Tubular carcinoma of the breast and associated intra-epithelial lesions: a comparative study with invasive low-grade ductal carcinomas. Virchows Arch. 2005; 447; 683-687.
5. Sahoo S, Recant WM. Triad of columnar cell alteration, lobular carcinoma in situ, and tubular carcinoma of the breast. Breast J. 2005; 11; 140-142.
6. Leibl S, Regitnig P, Moinfar F. Flat epithelial atypia (DIN 1a, atypical columnar change): an underdiagnosed entity very frequently coexisting with lobular neoplasia. Histopathology 2007; 50; 859-865.
7. Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z et al. High frequency of coexistence of columnar cell lesions, lobular neoplasia, and low grade ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive tubular carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 417-426.
8. Brogi E, Oyama T, Koerner FC. Atypical cystic lobules in patients with lobular neoplasia. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2001; 9; 201-206.
9. Schnitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A. Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2003; 10; 113-124.
10. Fraser JL, Raza S, Chorny K, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions: a spectrum of changes frequently present in breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1998; 22; 1521-1527.
11. Rosen PP. Columnar cell hyperplasia is associated with lobular carcinoma in situ and tubular carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1999; 23; 1561.
12. Bratthauer GL, Tavassoli FA. Assessment of lesions coexisting with various grades of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2004; 444; 340-344.
13. Schnitt SJ. The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: flat epithelial atypia-classification, pathologic features and clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res. 2003; 5; 263-268.
14. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (eds). World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.
15. Hwang ES, Nyante SJ, Yi Chen Y et al. Clonality of lobular carcinoma in situ and synchronous invasive lobular carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100; 2562-2572.
16. Mastracci TL, Shadeo A, Colby SM et al. Genomic alterations in lobular neoplasia: a microarray comparative genomic hybridization signature for early neoplastic proliferation in the breast. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2006; 45; 1007-1017.
17. Lu YJ, Osin P, Lakhani SR et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia and potential roles for gains and losses of genetic material in breast neoplasia. Cancer Res. 1998; 58; 4721-4727.
18. Azzopardi JG. Problems in breast pathology. London: Saunders, 1979.
19. Moinfar F. Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast: a review of diagnostic criteria, differential diagnoses, molecular-genetic findings, and clinical relevance-it is time to appreciate the Azzopardi concept! Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2009; 133; 879-892.
20. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet. 1998; 20; 207-211.
21. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997; 20; 399-407.
22. Erdogan F, Ullmann R, Chen W et al. Characterization of a 5.3Mb deletion in 15q14 by comparative genomic hybridization using a whole genome 'tiling path' BAC array in a girl with heart defect, cleft palate, and developmental delay. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2007; 143; 172-178.
23. Krzywinski M, Bosdet I, Smailus D et al. A set of BAC clones spanning the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32; 3651-3660.
24. Osoegawa K, Mammoser AG, Wu C et al. A bacterial artificial chromosome library for sequencing the complete human genome. Genome Res. 2001; 11; 483-496.
25. Ishkanian AS, Malloff CA, Watson SK et al. A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 2004; 36; 299-303.
26. Fiegler H, Gribble SM, Burford DC et al. Array painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes using DNA microarrays. J. Med. Genet. 2003; 40; 664-670.
27. Edgar R, Barrett T. NCBI GEO standards and services for microarray data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006; 24; 1471-1472.
28. Chen W, Erdogan F, Ropers HH, Lenzner S, Ullmann R. CGHPRO-a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6; 85.
29. Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R, Wigler M. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004; 5; 557-572.
30. Barrett T, Edgar R. Gene expression omnibus: microarray data storage, submission, retrieval, and analysis. Methods Enzymol. 2006; 411; 352-369.
31. Boldt V, Stacher E, Halbwedl I et al. Positioning of necrotic lobular intraepithelial neoplasias (LIN, grade 3) within the sequence of breast carcinoma progression. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2010; 49; 463-470.
32. Farabegoli F, Hermsen MA, Ceccarelli C et al. Simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss is associated with steroid receptor presence and low proliferation in breast carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2004; 17; 449-455.
33. Gunther K, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Amo-Takyi BK et al. Differences in genetic alterations between primary lobular and ductal breast cancers detected by comparative genomic hybridization. J. Pathol. 2001; 193; 40-47.
34. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast-evidence of multiple genetic pathways. J. Pathol. 1999; 187; 396-402.
35. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R et al. Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes. J. Pathol. 1999; 189; 521-526.
36. Cleton-Jansen AM, Buerger H, Haar N et al. Different mechanisms of chromosome 16 loss of heterozygosity in well- versus poorly differentiated ductal breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004; 41; 109-116.
37. Roylance R, Gorman P, Harris W et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1999; 59; 1433-1436.