Probabilistic approach to multi-objective Volt/Var control of distribution system considering hybrid fuel cell and wind energy sources using Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

Renewable Energy

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 228-240

  Malekpour, Ahmad Reza ^a   Tabatabaei, Sajad ^b   Niknam, Taher ^c  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fuel cell power plant; Probabilistic power flow; Stochastic optimization; Volt Var control; Wind farms

Indexed keywords

FUEL CELL POWER PLANTS; PROBABILISTIC POWER FLOW; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATIONS; VOLT/VAR CONTROL; WIND FARMS;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC LOAD FLOW; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FUEL CELLS; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; POWER PLANTS; POWER TRANSFORMERS; REACTIVE POWER; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WIND POWER;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

ALGORITHM; CONTROL SYSTEM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL POWER; FUEL CELL; POWER PLANT; PROBABILITY; STOCHASTICITY; WIND FARM;

ANURA;

EID: 80053285966     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bourouni K., Ben M'Barek T., Al Taee A. Design and optimization of desalination reverse osmosis plants driven by renewable energies using genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy 2011, 36(3):936-950.
2. Niknam T., Zeinoddini Meymand H., Nayeripour M. A practical algorithm for optimal operation management of distribution network including fuel cell power plants. Renewable Energy 2010, 35:1696-1714.
3. Snyder B., Kaiser M.J. Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy. Renewable Energy 2009, 34(6):1567-1578.
4. Baron M.E., Hsu M.Y. Volt/var control at distribution substations. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems Feb. 1999, 14(1):312-318.
5. Niknam T. A new approach based on Ant colony optimization for daily volt/var control in distribution networks considering distributed generators. Energy Conversion and Management 2008, 49:3417-3424.
6. Niknam T. An efficient optimization algorithm based on ACO for daily volt/var control in distribution networks considering DER. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 2008, 20:119-132.
7. Niknam T., Ranjbar A.M., Shirani A.R. A new approach based on Ant algorithm for volt/var control in distribution network considering distributed generation. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B 2005, 29:1-15.
8. Niknam T., Ranjbar A.M., Shirani A.R. An approach for volt/var control in distribution network with distributed generation. International Journal of Science and Technology, Scientia Iranica 2005, 12:34-42.
9. Niknam T., Bahman Firouzi B., Ostadi A. A new fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization for daily volt/var control in distribution networks considering distributed generators. Applied Energy 2010, 87:1919-1928.
10. Carvalho P.M.S., Correia P.F., Ferreira L.A.F.M. Distributed reactive power generation control for voltage rise mitigation in distribution networks. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 2008, 23:766-772.
11. Madureira A.G., Lopes J.A.P. Coordinated voltage support in distribution networks with distributed generation and microgrids. IET Renewable Power Generation 2009, 3:439-454.
12. Viawan F.A., Karlsson D. Voltage and reactive power control in systems with synchronous Machine-based distributed generation. IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery 2008, 23:1079-1087.
13. Su C.L. Comparative analysis of voltage control strategies in distribution networks with distributed generation. IEEE/PES General Meeting 2009, 1-7.
14. Senjyu T., Miyazato Y., Yona A., Urasaki N., Funabashi T. Optimal distribution voltage control and coordination with distributed generation. IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery 2008, 23:1236-1242.
15. J. Hethey, S. Leweson, Probabilistic Analysis of Reactive Power Control Strategies for Wind Farms, Master thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2008.
16. P. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Bak-Jensen, R. Villafáfila, S. Sörensen, Study of power fluctuation from Dispersed generations and loads and its impact on a distribution network through a probabilistic approach, Proceeding of 9th International conference on electric power quality and utilization. Barcelona, 9-11, October 2007.
17. Morales J.M., Perez-Ruiz J. Point estimate schemes to solve the probabilistic power flow. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 2007, 22:1594-1601.
18. Hatziargyriou N.D., Karatsanis T.S. Distribution system voltage and reactive power control based on probabilistic load flow analysis. IEE Proceedings Generation Transmission Distribution July. 1997, 144:363-369.
19. Hatziargyriou N.D., Karakatsanis T.S., Lorentzou M.I. Voltage control settings to increase wind power based on probabilistic load flow. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2005, 27:656-661.
20. Bie Z., LI G., Liu H., Wang X., Wang X. Studies on voltage fluctuation in the integration of wind power plants using probabilistic load flow. Proceedings IEEE/PES General Meeting 2008, 1-7.
21. Hong Y.Y., Luo Y.F. Optimal VAR control considering wind farms using probabilistic load-flow and gray-based genetic algorithms. IEEE Transaction on Power Delivery July 2009, 24:1441-1449.
22. Su C. Stochastic evaluation of voltages in distribution networks with distributed generation using Detailed distribution operation models. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems May 2010, 25:786-795.
23. Elbeltagi E., Hegazy T., Grierson D. Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2005, 19:43-53.
24. Morales J.M., Baringo L., Conejo A.J., Minguez R. Probabilistic power flow with correlated wind sources. IET Generation Transmission Distribution 2010, 4:641-651.
25. Marwali M.K.C., Ma H., Shahidehpour S.M., Abdul-Rahman K.H. Short-term generation scheduling in photovoltaic- utility grid with battery storage. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 1998, 13:1057-1062.
26. Shen M., Meuleman W., Scott K. The characteristics of power generation of static state fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 2003, 115:203-209.
27. Rosenblueth E. Point estimate for probability moments. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of United States of America 1975, 72:3812-3814.
28. Hong H.P. An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1998, 59:261-267.
29. Su C. Probabilistic load-flow computation using point estimate method. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems November 2005, 20:1842-1851.
30. Caramia P., Carpinelli G., Varilone P. Point estimate schemes for probabilistic three phase load flow. Electric Power Systems Research 2010, 80:168-175.
31. Zhang P., Lee S.T. Probabilistic load flow computation using the method of combined cumulants and Gram-Charlier expansion. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems Feb 2004, 19:676-682.
32. Li G., Zhang X. Comparison between two probabilistic load flow methods for reliability assessment. IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting 2009, 1-7.
33. Niknam T., Olamaie J., Khorshidi R. A hybrid algorithm based on HBMO and fuzzy set for multi-objective distribution feeder reconfiguration. World Applied Sciences Journal 2008, 4:308-315.
34. Eusuff M., Lansey K. Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2003, 129:10-25.
35. Eusuff M., Lansey K., Pasha F. Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm: a memetic meta-heuristic for discrete optimization. Engineering Optimization 2006, 38:129-154.
36. Rahimi-Vahed A., Mirzaei A.H. A hybrid multi-objective shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for a mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2007, 53:642-666.
37. Amiri B., Fathian M., Maroosi A. Application of shuffled frog-leaping algorithm on clustering. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2009, 45:199-209.
38. Rahimi-Vahed A., Dangchi M., Rafiei H., Salimi E. A novel hybrid multi-objective shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for a bi-criteria permutation flow shop scheduling problem. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2009, 41:1227-1239.
39. Chung G., Lansey K. Application of the shuffled frog leaping algorithm for the optimization of a general large-scale water supply system. Water Resources Management 2009, 23:797-823.
40. Ahuja A., Das S., Pahwa A. An AIS-ACO hybrid approach for multi-objective distribution system reconfiguration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007, 22(3):1101-1111.
41. K. A. Denise, D'. Arnaud, Optimization of renewable energy resources (RERs) for Enhancing network performance for distribution systems, Master thesis, Howard University, 2010.