An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1023-1026

  Nissim, Malvina ^a   Dingare, Shipra ^a   Carletta, Jean ^a   Steedman, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION SCHEME; COREFERENCE; REPRODUCIBILITIES;

EID: 80053277882     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. M. Ariel. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. Routledge, New York.
2. C. F. Baker, C. J. Fillmore, and J. B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project.
3. In Christian Boitet and Pete Whitelock, editors, Proceedings of COLING-ACL, pages 86-90.
4. B. Birner and G. Ward. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Cambridge University Press.
5. J. Carletta, S. Dingare, M. Nissim, and T. Nikitina. 2004. Using the NITE XML Toolkit on the Switchboard Corpus to study syntactic choice: a case study. In Proc. of LREC2004.
6. J. Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
7. H. H. Clark. 1975. Bridging. In R. Schank and B. Nash-Webber, editors, Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. S. Davies, M. Poesio, F. Bruneseaux, and L. Romary. 1998. Annotating coreference in dialogues: Proposal for a scheme for MATE, July. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/poesio/anno-manual.html.
9. M. Eckert and M. Strube. 2001. Dialogue acts, synchronising units and anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 17(1):51-89.
10. C. Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. J. Godfrey, E. Holliman, and J. McDaniel. 1992. SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proceedings of ICASSP-92, pages 517-520.
12. J. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2):274-307.
13. J. A. Hawkins. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. Croom Helm, London.
14. L. Hirschman and N. Chinchor. 1997. MUC-7 coreference task definition. In Proc. of MUC-7.
15. K. Lambrecht. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. CUP, Cambridge.
16. S. Löbner. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics, 4:279-326.
17. R. Passonneau. 1996. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript, December.
18. M. Poesio and R. Vieira. 1998. A corpus-based investigation of definite descriptions use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183-216.
19. M. Poesio. 2000. The GNOME annotation scheme manual. http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/gnome/anno-manual.html.
20. E. F. Prince. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole, editor, Radical Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York.
21. E. Prince. 1992. The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In S. Thompson and W. Mann, editors, Discourse description: diverse analyses of a fund raising text, pages 295-325. John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam.
22. S. Salmon-Alt and R. Vieira. 2002. Nominal expressions in multilingual corpora: Definites and demonstratives. In Proc. of LREC2002, 2002, pages 1627-1634.
23. J. Spenader. 2001. Between binding and accommodation. In P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser, and H. Zeevat, editors, Proceedings of Bi-Dialog 2001, pages 162-173.
24. M. Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. E. Vallduvi. 1992. The Informational Component. Garland, New York.
26. T. Wasow. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. CSLI Publications.