Anticipation of tennis-shot direction from whole-body movement: The role of movement amplitude and dynamics

Human Movement Science

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 957-965

  Smeeton, N J ^a   Huys, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b CNRS and Université de la Méditerranée   (France)

Author keywords

Advance cue; Biological motion perception; Expert novice; PCA; Prediction; Sport

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; STIMULATION; TENNIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TENNIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053259562     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abernethy B., Gill D.P., Parks S.L., Packer S.T. Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception 2001, 30:233-252.
2. Atkinson A.P., Dittrich W.H., Gemmell A.J., Young A.W. Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception 2004, 104:717-746.
3. Balk S.A., Tyrrell R.A., Brooks J., Carpenter T.L. Highlighting human form and motion information enhances the conspicuity of pedestrians at night. Perception 2008, 37:1276-1284.
4. Blake R., Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 58:47-73.
5. Bruce V., Green P.R., Georgeson M.A. Visual perception: Physiology, psychology and ecology 2004, Psychology Press, Hove. 4th ed.
6. Cañal-Bruland R., Schmidt M. Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:235-240.
7. Daffertshofer A., Lamoth C.J., Meijer O.G., Beek P.J. PCA in studying coordination and variability: A tutorial. Clinical Biomechanics 2004, 19:415-428.
8. Haken H. Principles of brain functioning. A synergetic approach to brain activity 1996, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
9. Haken H. Information and self-organization. A macroscopic approach to complex systems 2000, Springer, Berlin.
10. Haken H. Synergetic computers and cognition: A top-down approach to neural nets 2004, New York, Springer.
11. Huys R., Canal-Bruland R., Hagemann N., Beek P.J., Smeeton N.J., Williams A.M. Global information pickup underpins anticipation of tennis shot direction. Journal of Motor Behavior 2009, 41:158-170.
12. Huys R., Smeeton N.J., Hodges N.J., Beek P.J., Williams A.M. On the dynamical information underlying visual anticipation skill in perceiving tennis shots. Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70:1217-1234.
13. Huys R., Studenka B.E., Rheaume N.L., Zelaznik H.N., Jirsa V.K. Distinct timing mechanisms produce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Computational Biology 2008, 4:e1000061.
14. Jackson R.C., Warren S., Abernethy B. Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica 2006, 123:355-371.
15. Jirsa V.K., Kelso J.A.S. The excitator as a minimal model for the coordination dynamics of discrete and rhythmic movement generation. Journal of Motor Behavior 2005, 37:35-51.
16. Johansson G. Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. Psychological Research 1976, 38:379-393.
17. Kelso J.A.S. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
18. Mather G. Foundations of perception 2006, Psychology Press, Hove.
19. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Muchisky M.M., Bingham G.R. Trajectory forms as a source of information about events. Perception & Psychophysics 2002, 64:15-31.
21. Perdikis, D., & Jirsa, V. K. (2010). Recognition of behavioral patterns. In XII Congreso Nacional de Psicologia de la Actividad Fisica y el Deporte (Vol. 14, p. 48).
22. Pollick F.E., Fidopiastis C., Braden V. Recognizing the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves. Perception 2001, 30:323-338.
23. Runeson S., Frykholm G. Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983, 112:585-615.
24. Shim J., Carlton L.G., Chow J.W., Chae W.S. The use of anticipatory visual cues by highly skilled tennis players. Journal of Motor Behavior 2005, 37:174-175.
25. Sebanz N., Shiffrar M. Bluffing bodies: Inferring intentions from actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:170-175.
26. Strogatz S.H. Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering 1994, Perseus, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
27. Troje N.F. Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2002, 2:371-387.
28. van der Kamp J., Rivas F., van Doorn H., Savelsbergh G. Ventral and dorsal contributions to visual anticipation of fast ball sports. International Journal of Sports Psychology 2008, 39:100-130.
29. Ward P., Williams A.M., Bennett S.J. Visual search and biological motion perception in tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73:107-112.
30. Westhoff C., Troje N.F. Kinematic cues for person identification from biological motion. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:241-253.
31. Williams A.M., Huys R., Cañal-Bruland R., Hagemann N. The dynamical information underpinning anticipation skill. Human Movement Science 2009, 28:362-370.
32. Wilson A., Bingham G.P. Dynamics, not kinematics, is an adequate basis for perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:709-710.
33. Zar, J. H.(1996).Biostatistical analysis (3rd ed.).New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.