From the editor's notebook - Volunteerism: Essential for AJR

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 197, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 773-774

  Berquist, Thomas H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ACADEMIC ADVISEMENT; CAREER MOBILITY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SCORING SYSTEM; VOLUNTARY WORKER; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 80053230047     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7375     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Berquist TH. Publication in the AJR: critical interactions among authors, reviewers, and section editors. AJR 2008; 191:1291-1292
2. Berquist TH. Peer review and biomedical publications: we all have the same issues. AJR 2009; 193:1199-1200
3. Callaham M. The natural history of peer reviewers: the decay of quality. (abstr) Proceedings of the 6th Congress for Peer Review and Biomedical Publications. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Congress for Peer Review and Biomedical Publications, 2009
4. Houry D, Callaham M, Green S. Does a mentoring program for new peer reviewers improve quality? A randomized controlled trial. (abstr) Proceedings of the 6th Congress for Peer Review and Biomedical Publications. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Congress for Peer Review and Biomedical Publications, 2009
5. Freda MC, Kearney MH, Baggs JG, Broome ME, Daugherty M. Peer review training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers. J Prof Nurs 2009; 25:101-108
6. Sheiman RG. The RSNA reviewer mentorship program. Radiology 2007; 244:631-632 (Pubitemid 47292074)
7. Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, et al. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31:145-152
8. Berquist TH. AJR reviewers: do we need a mentoring process? AJR 2011; 197:1
9. Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, Pickhardt PJ, Provenzale JM. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR 2005; 184:1731-1735 (Pubitemid 40770139)