Syntax-based grammaticality improvement using CCG and guided search

EMNLP 2011 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1147-1157

  Zhang, Yue ^a   Clark, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEST FIRST SEARCH; GUIDED SEARCH; PARSE TREES; SEARCH PROBLEM;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SYNTACTICS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053228872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Srinivas Bangalore, Owen Rambow, and Steve Whittaker. 2000. Evaluation metrics for generation. In Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG2000), Mitzpe, pages 1-8.
2. Graeme Blackwood, Adrià de Gispert, and William Byrne. 2010. Fluency constraints for minimum bayesrisk decoding of statistical machine translation lattices. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), pages 71-79, Beijing, China, August. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee.
3. Sharon A. Caraballo and Eugene Charniak. 1998. New figures of merit for best-first probabilistic chart parsing. Comput. Linguist., 24:275-298, June.
4. Stephen Clark and James R. Curran. 2007. Widecoverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics, 33(4):493-552.
5. Michael Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1-8, Philadelphia, USA.
6. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2005. Learning as search optimization: approximate large margin methods for structured prediction. In ICML, pages 169-176.
7. Dominic Espinosa, Michael White, and Dennis Mehay. 2008. Hypertagging: Supertagging for surface realization with CCG. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 183-191, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Yoav Goldberg and Michael Elhadad. 2010. An efficient algorithm for easy-first non-directional dependency parsing. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 742-750, Los Angeles, California, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Julia Hockenmaier and Mark Steedman. 2007. CCG-bank: A corpus of CCG derivations and dependency structures extracted from the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 33(3):355-396.
10. Julia Hockenmaier. 2003. Parsing with generative models of predicate-argument structure. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the ACL, pages 359-366, Sapporo, Japan.
11. Kevin Knight. 2007. Automatic language translation generation help needs badly. In MT Summit XI Workshop on Using Corpora for NLG: Keynote Address.
12. Phillip Koehn. 2010. Statistical Machine Translation. Cambridge University Press.
13. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Stefan Riezler, Tracy H. King, Ronald M. Kaplan, Richard Crouch, John T. III Maxwell, and Mark Johnson. 2002. Parsing the Wall Street Journal using a lexical-functional grammar and discriminative estimation techniques. In Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 271-278, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. F. Rosenblatt. 1958. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65:386-408.
16. Libin Shen and Aravind Joshi. 2008. LTAG dependency parsing with bidirectional incremental construction. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 495-504, Honolulu, Hawaii, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Libin Shen, Giorgio Satta, and Aravind Joshi. 2007. Guided learning for bidirectional sequence classification. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 760-767, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
18. Mark Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
19. Sebastian Varges and Chris Mellish. 2010. Instance-based natural language generation. Natural Language Engineering, 16(3):309-346.
20. Stephen Wan, Mark Dras, Robert Dale, and Cécile Paris. 2009. Improving grammaticality in statistical sentence generation: Introducing a dependency spanning tree algorithm with an argument satisfaction model. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), pages 852-860, Athens, Greece, March. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Michael White and Rajakrishnan Rajkumar. 2009. Perceptron reranking for CCG realization. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 410-419, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Michael White. 2004. Reining in CCG chart realization. In Proc. INLG-04, pages 182-191.