The (social) construction of information security

Information Society

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 326-335

  Pieters, Wolter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Causal insulation; Constructionism; Information security; Security perimeters; System theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053226094     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2011.607038     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bolzoni, D., and S. Etalle. 2008. Approaches in anomaly-based network intrusion detection systems. In Intrusion Detection Systems, pp. 1-15. Advances in Information Security 38. Berlin: Springer.
2. Dawkins, R. 1989. The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Dragovic, B., and J. Crowcroft. 2004. Information exposure control through data manipulation for ubiquitous computing. In NSPW'04: Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on New Security Paradigms, pp. 57-64. New York: ACM.
4. Election Process Advisory Commission. 2007. Voting with confidence. http://www.kiesraad.nl/nl/OverigeContent/Bestanden/pdfthema/PdfvoorEngelsesite/Votingwithconfidence.pdf (accessed June 17, 2011).
5. Ess, C. 2009. Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics: Current perspectives, future directions. The Information Society 25(3):159-168.
6. Federspiel, S. B., and B. Brincker. 2010. Software as risk: Introduction of open standards in the Danish public sector. The Information Society 26(1): 38-47.
7. Floridi, L. 1999. Information ethics: on the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 1(1): 37-56.
8. Floridi, L. 2005. The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7(4): 185-200.
9. Gutwirth, S., and P. de Hert. 2008. Regulating Profiling in a Democratic Constitutional State. In Profiling the European citizen: Crossdisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Hildebrandt and S. Gutwirth, pp. 271-302. Berlin: Springer.
10. Jacobs, B., W. Pieters, and M. Warnier. 2005. Statically checking confidentiality via dynamic labels. In WITS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Issues in the Theory of Security, pp. 50-56. New York, NY: ACM.
11. Jericho Forum. 2005. Jericho whitepaper. https://www.opengroup.org/jericho/BusinessCaseforDPv1.0.pdf (accessed June 17, 2011).
12. Karjoth, G., M. Schunter, and M. Waidner. 2003. The Platform for enterprise privacy practices: privacy-enabled management of customer data. In PET'02: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pp. 194-198. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2482. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actornetwork- theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Luhmann, N. 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Luhmann, N. 2005 [1993]. Risk: A sociological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
16. Mercuri, R. 2002. A better ballot box? IEEE Spectrum 39:26-50.
17. Nickel, P. J. Forthcoming. Trust in technological systems. In Norms and the artificial: Moral and non-moral norms in technology, eds. M. de Vries, S. Hansson, and A. Meijers. Berlin: Springer.
18. Nissenbaum, H. 1998. Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy 17(5/6):559-596.
19. Nunes Leal Franqueira, V., R. H. C. Lopes, and P. van Eck. 2009. Multi-step attack modelling and simulation (MsAMS) framework based on mobile ambients. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on AppliedComputing, SAC'2009, pp. 66-73. NewYork: ACM.
20. Pieters, W. 2006. Acceptance of voting technology: Between confidence and trust. In Trust management, 4th International Conference, iTrust 2006, pp. 283-297. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3986. Berlin: Springer.
21. Pieters, W. 2009. Combatting electoral traces: The Dutch tempest discussion and beyond. In E-voting and Identity: Second International Conference, VOTE-ID 2009, 172-190. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5767. Berlin: Springer.
22. Pieters, W. 2010. Reve{a,i}ling the risks: A phenomenology of information security. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 14:176-188.
23. Pieters, W. 2011a. Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI. Ethics and Information Technology 13(1):53-64.
24. Pieters, W. 2011b. Representing humans in system security models: An actor-network approach. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications 2(1):75-92.
25. Probst, C.W., R. R. Hansen, and F. Nielson. 2007. Where can an insider attack? In Workshop on formal aspects in security and trust, FAST 2006, pp. 127-142. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4691. Berlin: Springer.
26. Sabelfeld, A., and A. C. Myers. 2003. Language-based informationflow security. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 21(1):5-19.
27. Scott, D. J. 2004. Abstracting application-level security policy for ubiquitous computing. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge.