During-incident process assessment in emergency management: Concept and strategy

Safety Science

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 90-102

  Chen, An ^a,b,c   Chen, Ning ^b   Li, Jimei ^a  

^a Chinese Academy of Science   (China)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE ENGENHARIA DO PORTO   (Portugal)

^c HENAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

During incident process assessment; Emergency management; Mitigability; Recoverability; Rescuability

Indexed keywords

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; MITIGABILITY; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; RECOVERABILITY; RESCUABILITY;

CIVIL DEFENSE; DECISION MAKING; DISASTERS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RATING;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DURING INCIDENT PROCESS MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY CARE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MASS DISASTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MITIGABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOVERABILITY; RESCUABILITY; RESCUE WORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 80053211035     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Antonioni G., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G., Cozzani V. Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2009, 94(9):1442-1450.
2. Brooks N., Adger W.N., Kelly P.M. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change Part A 2005, 15(2):151-163.
3. Brown D.F., Dunn W.E. Application of a quantitative risk assessment method to emergency response planning. Computers & Operations Research 2007, 34(5):1243-1265.
4. Bruneau M., Chang S.E., Eguchi R.T., et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 2003, 19(4):733-752.
5. Buckle P., Marsh G., Smale S. Assessing resilience & vulnerability: principles, strategies & actions. Emergency Management Australia 2001.
6. Burby R.J. Cooperating with Nature, Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Hazard Assessment: The Factual Basis for Planning and Mitigation 1998, Joseph Henry Press, National Academy of Sciences, (Chapter 5).
7. Cappabianca F., Barbolini M., Natale L. Snow avalanche risk assessment and mapping: a new method based on a combination of statistical analysis, avalanche dynamics simulation and empirically-based vulnerability relations integrated in a GIS platform. Cold Regions Science and Technology 2008, 53(3):193-205.
8. Chen A., Li M.L., Chen N. New trends of thought on theory and practice in modern emergency management. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Science 2008, 23:531-537. (in Chinese).
9. Chen, A., Li, J., Chen, N., 2008b. "Mitigability" measurement model and application in emergency management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crisis and Emergency Management, Crisis and Emergency Management in Global Society: Managing the Disaster Relief and Promoting the Disaster Management Industry, pp. 69-79.
10. Chen A., Chen N., Ni H. Modern Emergency Management: Theory and Method 2009, Science Press, (in Chinese).
11. Chen A., Zhao J., Zhang R. Recoverable evaluation in emergency management. Impact of Science on Society 2009, 2:36-39. (in Chinese).
12. Clark W.C., et al. Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Risks 2000, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge, MA.
13. Cutter S.L. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 1996, 20:529-539.
14. Dai F.C., Lee C.F., Ngai Y.Y. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering Geology 2002, 64(1):65-87.
15. Dekel E., Scotchmer S. On the evolution of attitudes towards risk in winner-take-all games. Journal of Economic Theory 1999, 87:125-143.
16. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., Wagner, G., Individual Risk Attitudes: New Evidence from a Large, Representative, Experimentally-Validated Survey, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 1730, 2005.
17. Dominey-Howes D., Papathoma M. Validating a tsunami vulnerability assessment model (the PTVA Model) using field data from the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Natural Hazards 2007, 40(1):113-136.
18. Ezell B.C. Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (I-VAM). Risk Analysis 2007, 27(3):571-583.
19. Fedeski M., Gwilliam J. Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: the development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83(1):50-61.
20. Gobi A.F., Pedrycz W. Fuzzy modelling through logic optimization. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2007, 45(3):488-510.
21. Guiso, L., Paiella, M., The Role of Risk Aversion in Predicting Individual Behavior, Bank of Italy, Working Paper No. 546, 2005.
22. Hu A.H., Hsu C.W., Kuo T.C., Wu W.C. Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36(3):7142-7147.
23. Jiang W., Deng L., Chen L., Wu J., Li J. Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics. Progress in Natural Science 2009, 19:1419-1425.
24. Kayniaa A.M., Papathoma-Köhleb M., Neuhäuserb B., Ratzingerb K., Wenzelb H., Medina-Cetinaa Z. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Engineering Geology 2008, 101(1-2):33-48.
25. Karimia I., Hüllermeier E. Risk assessment system of natural hazards: a new approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2007, 158(9):987-999.
26. Khan F.I., Abbasi S.A. Assessment of risks posed by chemical industries-application of a new computer automated tool MAXCRED-III. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1999, 2(6):455-469.
27. Kim E., Park M., Kim S., Park M. A transformed input-domain approach to fuzzy modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 1998, 6(4):596-604.
28. Kim E., Pedrycz W. Information granulation as a basis of fuzzy modeling. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 2007, 18(2):123-148.
29. Knight F.H. Risk, uncertainty, and profit 1921, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA.
30. Lin C.T., Cheng W.C., Liang S.-F. An on-line ICA-mixture-model-based self-constructing fuzzy neural network. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fund, Theory and Applications 2005, 52(1):207-221.
31. Lin C.T., Lu Y.C. A neural fuzzy system with linguistic teaching signals. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 1995, 3(2):169-189.
32. Lin, Y., Liu, S., 2004. A historical introduction to grey systems theory. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Hague, the Netherlands, vol. 3. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., New York, pp. 2403-2408.
33. Liu S., Guo T., Dang Y. Grey Systems Theory and Its Applications 1999, Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese).
34. Markowski A.S., Mannan M.S. Fuzzy risk matrix. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008, 159:152-157.
35. Mustafa D. Reinforcing vulnerability? Disaster relief, recovery, and response to the 2001 flood, in Rawal Pindi, Pakistan. Global Environmental Change B: Environmental Hazards 2003, 5(3):71-82.
36. Ni H., Chen A., Chen N. Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Safety Sciences 2010, 48(10):1269-1278.
37. O'Brien K., Leichenko R., Kelkar U., et al. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change 2004, 14:303-313.
38. Ossa L., Gámez J.A., Puerta J.M. Learning weighted linguistic fuzzy rules by using specifically-tailored hybrid estimation of distribution algorithms. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2009, 50(3):541-560.
39. Papathoma M., Dominey-Howes D. The ''PTVAM'' tsunami vulnerability assessment model. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2003, 3:733-744.
40. Paton D., Millar M., Johnston D. Community resilience to volcanic hazards consequences. Natural Hazards 2001, 24(2):157-169.
41. Paul R., Garvey P.R., Lansdowne Z.F. Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks. Air Force Journal of Logistics 1998, 22(1):16-23.
42. Reniers G.L.L., Ale B.J.M., Dullaert W., Foubert B. Decision support systems for major accident prevention in the chemical process industry: a developers' survey. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2006, 19(6):604-620.
43. Robson A.J. Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk. Econometrica 1992, 60:837-857.
44. Robson A.J. A biological basis for expected and non-expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory 1996, 68:397-424.
45. Robson A.J. The evolution of attitudes to risk: lottery tickets and relative wealth. Games and Economic Behavior 1996, 14:190-207.
46. Roh S., Pedrycz W., Oh S.-K. Genetic optimization of fuzzy polynomial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2007, 54(4):2219-2238.
47. Shangguan Y., Chen A., Ni H. Research on the assessment model for salvability in emergency management. China Soft Science Magazine 2009, 9:165-173. (in Chinese).
48. Strobel M. Essays in Experimental Economics 2001, Shaker, Aachen.
49. Sugeno M., Kang G.T. Fuzzy modeling and control of multilayer incinerator. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1986, 18:329-346.
50. Sugeno M., Yasukawa T. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 1993, 1(1):7-31.
51. Sun Z.K., Mao G.M., Zou Q.J. Research on the post-earthquake restoration process and the economical loss. Journal of Natural Disasters 1994, 3(3):11-17.
52. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 1985, 15(1):116-132.
53. To T. Risk and Evolution. Economic Theory 1999, 13:329-343.
54. Willhite M.A. Establishing a Program Risk Baseline, An Annotated Briefing 1998, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, pp. 1-10.
55. Yin K., Chen L., Zhang G. Regional landslide hazard warning and risk assessment. Earth Science Frontiers 2007, 14(6):85-93.
56. Zhang J. Risk assessment of drought disaster in the maize-growing region of Songliao Plain. China Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2004, 102(2):133-153.
57. Zhao Z., et al. The index and state-function of casualties in earthquake. Journal of Natural Disasters 1998, 7(3):90-96.
58. Zhou S.H. A new fuzzyfication method. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics 2004, 18(4):59-63. (in Chinese).
59. Zhu Q., Kuang X., Shen Y. Risk matrix method and its application in the field of technical project risk management. Engineering Science 2003, 5(1):89-94. (in Chinese).