Fight tactics in wood ants: Individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1722, 2011, Pages 3243-3250

  Batchelor, Tim P ^a   Briffa, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aggression; Body size; Formica rufa; Group size; Lanchester's attrition laws; Resource holding potential

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BODY SIZE; GROUP SIZE; RESOURCE USE;

ANIMALIA; FORMICA RUFA; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 80053201761     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0062     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Huntingford, F. A. & Turner, A. K. 1987 Animal conflict. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
2. Hurd, P. L. 2006 Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling. J. Theor. Biol. 241, 639-648. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.001)
3. Batchelor, T. P. & Briffa, M. 2010 Influences on resource-holding potential during dangerous group contests between wood ants. Anim. Behav. 80, 443-449. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.05.030)
4. Jutsum, A. R. 1979 Interspecific aggression in leafcutting ants. Anim. Behav. 27, 833-838. (doi:10.1016/ 0003-3472(79)90020-4)
5. Kasumovic, M. M., Elias, D. O., Punzalan, D., Mason, A. C. & Andrade, M. C. B. 2009 Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size. Anim. Behav. 77, 1533-1538. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.026)
6. Van Wilgenburg, E., Clemencet, J. & Tsutsui, N. D. 2010 Experience influences aggressive behaviour in the Argentine ant. Biol. Lett. 6, 152-155. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0616)
7. Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. 1987 Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. J. Theor. Biol. 127, 187-206. (doi:10.1016/S0022- 5193(87)80130-3)
8. Arnott, G. & Elwood, R. W. 2008 Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim. Behav. 76, 529-542. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2008.04.019)
9. Arnott, G. & Elwood, R. W. 2009 Assessment of fighting ability in animal contestssAnim. Behav. 77, 991-1004. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.010)
10. Bergman, M., Olofsson, M. & Wiklund, C. 2010 Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3027-3033. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2010.0646)
11. Arnott, G. & Elwood, R.W. 2007 Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 3011-3017. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2007.1196)
12. Nijman, V. & Heuts, B. A. 2000 Effect of environmental enrichment upon resource holding power in fish in prior residence situations. Behav. Process. 49, 77-83. (doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00078-4)
13. Briffa, M. & Elwood, R. W. 2000 The power of shell rapping influences rates of eviction in hermit crabs. Behav. Ecol. 11, 288-293. (doi:10.1093/beheco/11.3.288)
14. Grafen, A. 1987 The logic of divisively asymmetric contests-respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Anim. Behav. 35, 462-467. (doi:10.1016/S0003- 3472(87)80271-3)
15. Lanchester, F. W. 1956 Mathematics in warfare. In The world of mathematics (ed. J. R. Newman), pp. 2137-2157. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
16. Wilson, M. L., Hauser, M. D. & Wrangham, R. W. 2001 Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim. Behav. 61, 1203-1216. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1706)
17. Crofoot, M. C., Gilby, I. C., Wikelski, M. C. & Kays, R. W. 2008 Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 577-581. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0707749105)
18. Harris, T. R. 2010 Multiple resource values and fighting ability measures influence intergroup conflict in guerezas (Colobus guereza). Anim. Behav. 79, 89-98. (doi:10.1016/ j.anbehav.2009.10.007)
19. Mosser, A. & Packer, C. 2009 Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo. Anim. Behav. 78, 359-370. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.024)
20. Hölldobler, B. & Lumsden, C. J. 1980 Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210, 732-739. (doi:10.1126/ science.210.4471.732)
21. Plowes, N. J. R. & Adams, E. S. 2005 An empirical test of Lanchester's square law: mortality during battles of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1809-1814. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3162)
22. Tanner, C. J. 2006 Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2737-2742. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3626)
23. Tanner, C. J. 2008 Aggressive group behaviour in the ant Formica xerophila is coordinated by direct nestmate contact Anim. Behav. 76, 1335-1341. (doi:10.1016/j. anbehav.2008.04.022)
24. Adams, E. S. & Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 2003 Lanchester's attrition models and fights among social animals. Behav. Ecol 14, 719-723. (doi:10.1093/ beheco/arg061)
25. Franks, N. R. & Partridge, L. W. 1993 Lanchester battles and the evolution of combat in ants. Anim. Behav. 45, 197-199. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1021)
26. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. 1990 The ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Sakata, H. & Katayama, N. 2001 Ant defence system: a mechanism organizing individual responses into efficient collective behavior. Ecol. Res. 16, 395-403. (doi:10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00404.x)
28. Lumsden, C. J. & Hölldobler, B. 1983 Ritualized combat and intercolony communication in ants. J. Theor. Biol. 100, 81-98. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(83)90093-0)
29. Elton, C. 1932 Territory among wood ants (Formica rufa L.) Picket Hill. J. Anim. Ecol. 1, 69-76. (doi:10.2307/996)
30. Skinner, G. J. 1980 Territory, trail structure and activity patterns in the wood-ant, Formica rufa (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in limestone woodland in Northwest England. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 381-394. (doi:10.2307/ 4253)
31. Roulston, T. H., Buczkowski, G. & Silverman, J. 2003 Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect Soc. 50, 151-159. (doi:10.1007/s00040-003-0624-1)
32. Carlin, N. F. & Hölldobler, B. 1983 Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants. Science 222, 1027-1029.(doi:10.1126/science.222.4627.1027)
33. Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V. & Grosberg, R. K. 2003 Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1078-1083. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0234412100)
34. Wallis, D. I. 1962 Aggressive behaviour in the ant, Formica fusca. Anim. Behav. 10, 267-274. (doi:10.1016/0003-3472(62)90050-7)
35. Wenseleers, T., Billen, J. & Hefetz, A. 2002 Territorial marking in the desert ant Cataglyphis niger: does it pay to play bourgeois? J. Insect Behav. 15, 85-93. (doi:10.1023/A:1014484229639)
36. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H. & White, J.-S. S. 2009 Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 127-135. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008)
37. Crawley, M. J. 2007 The R book. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
38. McComb, K., Packer, C. & Pusey, A. 1994 Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim. Behav. 47, 379-387. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1052)
39. Heinsohn, R. 1997 Group territoriality in two populations of African lions. Anim. Behav. 53, 1143-1147. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0316)
40. Seddon, N. & Tobias, J. A. 2003 Communal singing in the cooperatively breeding subdesert mesite Monias benschi: evidence of numerical assessment? J. Avian Biol. 34, 72-80. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2003.03067.x)
41. Buczkowski, G. & Bennett, G. W. 2008 Aggressive interactions between the introduced Argentine ant, Linepithema humile and the native odorous house ant, Tapinoma sessile. Biol. Invas. 10, 1001-1111. (doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9179-9)
42. Lemoli, F. & Mori, A. 1986 The aggression test as a possible taxonomic tool in the Formica rufa group. Aggress. Behav. 12, 93-102. (doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1986) 12:2,93::AID-AB2480120203.3.0.CO;2-O
43. Tofilski, A. 2002 Influence of age polyethism on longevity of workers in social insects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51, 234-237. (doi:10.1007/s00265-001-0429-z)
44. Cowlishaw, G. 1995 Behavioral-patterns in baboon group encounters-the role of resource competition and male reproductive strategies. Behaviour 132, 75-86. (doi:10.1163/156853995X00298)
45. Harrington, F. H. & Mech, L. D. 1979 Wolf howling and its role in territory maintenance. Behaviour 68, 207-249. (doi:10.1163/156853979X00322)
46. Radford, A. N. & Du Plessis, M. A. 2004 Territorial vocal rallying in the green woodhoopoe: factors affecting contest length and outcome. Anim. Behav. 68, 803-810. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.01.010)
47. Rangel, J., Griffin, S. R. & Seeley, T. D. 2010 Nest-site defense by competing honey bee swarms during househunting. Ethology 116, 608-618.
48. Adams, E. S. 1990 Boundary disputes in the territorial ant Azteca trigona-effects of asymmetries in colony size. Anim. Behav. 39, 321-328. (doi:10.1016/S0003- 3472(05)80877-2)
49. Bhatkar, A.,Whitcomb, W. H., Buren, W. F., Callahan, P. & Carlysle, T. 1972 Confrontation behavior between Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the imported fire ant. Environ. Entomol. 1, 274-279.
50. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The multiple recruitment systems of African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 19-60. (doi:10.1007/BF00300045)
51. Sugiura, H., Saito, C., Sato, S., Agetsuma, N., Takahashi, H., Tanaka, T., Furuichi, T. & Takahata, Y. 2000 Variation in intergroup encounters in two populations of Japanese macaques. Int. J. Primatol. 21, 519-535. (doi:10.1023/A:1005448120967)
52. Shelley, E. L., Tanaka, M. Y. U., Ratnathicam, A. R. & Blumstein, D. T. 2004 Can Lanchester's laws help explain interspecific dominance in birds? Condor 106, 395-400. (doi:10.1650/7424)
53. Fellers, J. H. 1987 Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68, 1466-1478. (doi:10.2307/1939230)
54. McGlynn, T. P. 1999 Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. Am. Nat. 154, 690-699. (doi:10.1086/303270)
55. Davidson, D. W. 1998 Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 484-490. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00145.x)
56. Gordon, D. M. & Kulig, A. W. 1996 Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology 77, 2393-2409. (doi:10.2307/2265741)
57. Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. 2001 Effects of colony-level variation on competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 61, 1181-1192. (doi:10.1006/anbe. 2000.1698)
58. Human, K. G. & Gordon, D. M. 1996 Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105, 405-412. (doi:10.1007/BF00328744)
59. Mabelis, A. A. 1979 Wood ant wars-the relationship between aggression and predation in the red wood ant (Formica polyctena Forst). Neth. J. Zool. 29, 451-620. (doi:10.1163/002829679X00016)
60. Powell, S. & Clark, E. 2004 Combat between large derived societies: a subterranean army ant established as a predator of mature leaf-cutting ant colonies. Insect Soc. 51, 342-351. (doi:10.1007/s00040-004-0752-2)
61. Carpintero, S., Retana, J., Cerda, X., Reyes-Lopez, J. & De Reyna, L. A. 2007 Exploitative strategies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and native ant species in a southern Spanish pine forest. Environ. Entomol. 36, 1100-1111. (doi:10.1603/0046-225X (2007)36[1100:ESOTIA]2.0.CO;2)
62. Driessen, G. J. J., Vanraalte, A. T. & Debruyn, G. J. 1984 Cannibalism in the red wood ant, Formica polyctena (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Oecologia 63, 13-22. (doi:10.1007/BF00379779)