Fighting for shells: How private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 274, Issue 1628, 2007, Pages 3011-3017

  Arnott, Gareth ^a   Elwood, Robert W ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Displays; Fighting behaviour; Hermit crab; Resource value

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CRAB; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; DISPLAY BEHAVIOR; FIGHTING; SHELL;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CRAB; DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; FIGHTING; MOTIVATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA);

EID: 36549002262     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1196     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams, E. S. & Caldwell, R. L. 1990 Deceptive communication in asymmetric fights of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus bredini. Anim. Behav. 39, 706-716. (doi:10. 1016/S0003-3472(05)80382-3)
2. Adams, E. S. & Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 1995 The cost of threat displays and the stability of deceptive communication. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 405-421. (doi:10.1006/jtbi. 1995.0151)
3. Backwell, P. R. Y., Christy, J. H., Telford, S. R., Jennions, M. D. & Passmore, N. I. 2000 Dishonest signalling in a fiddler crab. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 719-724. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1062)
4. Bridge, A. P., Elwood, R. W. & Dick, J. T. A. 2000 Imperfect assessment and limited information preclude optimal strategies in male-male fights in the orb-weaving spider Metellina mengei. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 273-279. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2000.0997)
5. Briffa, M. & Elwood, R. W. 2001 Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights. Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 1841-1848. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1752)
6. Briffa, M. & Elwood, R. W. 2002 Power of shell-rapping signals influences physiological costs and subsequent decisions during hermit crab fights. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 2331-2336. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002. 2158)
7. Briffa, M. & Elwood, R. W. 2004 Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 373-379. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2003.2633)
8. Briffa, M. & Elwood, R. W. 2005 Metabolic consequences of shell choice in Pagurus bernhardus: do hermit crabs prefer cryptic or portable shells? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 143-148. (doi:10.1007/s00265- 005-0020-0)
9. Briffa, M., Elwood, R. W. & Dick, J. T. A. 1998 Analysis of repeated signals during shell fights in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 1467-1474. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0459)
10. Cristol, D. A. 1992 Food-deprivation influences dominance status in dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. Anim. Behav. 43, 117-124. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80077-6)
11. Crowley, P. H., Gillett, S. & Lawton, J. H. 1988 Contests between larval damselflies: empirical steps toward a better ESS model. Anim. Behav. 36, 1496-1510. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80220-3)
12. Dall, S. R. X., Giraldeau, L., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M. & Stephens, D. W. 2005 Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 187-193. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010)
13. Dowds, B. M. & Elwood, R. W. 1983 Shell wars: assessment strategies and the timing of decisions in hermit crab shell fights. Behaviour 85, 1-24.
14. Dugatkin, L. A. & Ohlsen, S. R. 1990 Contrasting asymmetries in value expectation and resource holding power: effects on attack behavior and dominance in the pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. Anim. Behav. 39, 802-804. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80394-X)
15. Elwood, R. W. & Adams, P. M. 1990 How hermit crabs Pagurus bernhardus L. deal with obstructions in the aperture of shells. Ir. Nat. J. 23, 180-185.
16. Elwood, R. W. & Glass, C. W. 1981 Negotiation or aggression during shell fights of the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Anim. Behav. 29, 1239-1244. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472 (81)80075-9)
17. Elwood, R. W. & Neil, S. J. 1992 Assessment and decisions: a study of information gathering by hermit crabs, 1st edn. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
18. Elwood, R. W., Pothanikat, R. M. E. & Briffa, M. 2006 Honest and dishonest displays, motivational state and subsequent decisions in hermit crab shell fights. Anim. Behav. 72, 853-859. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2006.01.025)
19. Englund, G. & Otto, C. 1991 Effects of ownership status, weight asymmetry, and case fit on the outcome of case contests in 2 populations of Agrypnia pagetana (Trichoptera, Phryganeidae) larvae. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 113-120. (doi:10.1007/BF00166485)
20. Enquist, M. 1985 Communication during aggressive interactions with particular reference to variation in choice of behaviour. Anim. Behav. 33, 1152-1161. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80175-5)
21. Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. 1987 Evolution of fighting behavior: the effect of variation in resource value. J. Theor. Biol. 127, 187-205. (doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80130-3)
22. Enquist, M., Plane, E. & Roed, J. 1985 Aggressive communication in Fulmars (Flumarus glacialis) competing for food. Anim. Behav. 33, 1007-1020. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80035-X)
23. Frey, D. F. & Pimental, R. A. 1978 Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In Quantitative ethology (ed. P. W. Colgan), pp. 219-245. New York, NY: Wiley.
24. Goubault, M., Scott, D. & Hardy, I. C. W. 2007 The importance of offspring value: maternal defence in parasitoid contests. Anim. Behav 74, 437-446. (doi:10. 1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.029)
25. Grafen, A. 1990 Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 517-546.
26. Hack, M. A., Thompson, D. J. & Fernandes, D. M. 1997 Fighting in males of the autumn spider, Metellina segmentata: effects of relative body size, prior residency and female value on contest outcome and duration. Ethology 103, 488-498.
27. Hansen, A. J. 1986 Fighting behavior in bald eagles: a test of game theory. Ecology 67, 787-797. (doi:10.2307/1937701)
28. Hughes, M. 2000 Deception with honest signals: signal residuals and signal function in snapping shrimp. Behav. Ecol. 11, 614-623. (doi:10.1093/beheco/11.6.614)
29. Humphries, E. L., Hebblethwaite, A. J., Batchelor, T. P. & Hardy, I. C. W. 2006 The importance of valuing resources: host weight and contender age as determinants of parasitoid wasp contest outcomes. Anim. Behav. 72, 891-898. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.015)
30. Hurd, P. L. & Enquist, M. 2005 A strategic taxonomy of biological communication. Anim. Behav. 70, 1155-1170. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2005.02.014)
31. Jackson, N. W. 1988 Information gathering and decision making during shell selection by the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. PhD thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.
32. Johnstone, R. A. 1998 Game theory and communication. In Game theory and animal behaviour (eds L. A. Dugatkin & H. K. Reeve), pp. 94-117. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Kotiaho, J. S., Alatalo, R. V., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. 1999 Honesty of agonistic signalling and effects of size and motivation asymmetry in contests. Acta ethologica 2, 13-21. (doi:10.1007/PL00012227)
34. Krebs, J. R. & Dawkins, R. 1984 Animal signals: mind reading and manipulation. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach (eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 380-402. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35. Lindstrom, K. 1992 The effect of resource holding potential, nest size and information about resource quality on the outcome of intruder-owner conflicts in the sand
36. goby. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 53-58. (doi:10.1007/BF00168594)
37. Maynard-Smith, J. 1979 Game theory and the evolution of behaviour. Proc. R. Soc. B 205, 475-488. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0080)
38. Maynard-Smith, J. & Harper, D. 2003 Animal signals. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
39. Maynard-Smith, J. & Parker, G. A. 1976 The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. behav. 24, 159-175. (doi:10. 1016/S0003-3472(76) 80110-8)
40. Neil, S. J. & Elwood, R. W. 1985 Behavioural modification during egg-brooding in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus L. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 94, 99-114. (doi:10.1016/0022-0981(85)90052-8)
41. Nosil, P. 2002 Food fights in house crickets, Acheta domesticus, and the effects of body size and hunger level. Can. J. Zool. 80, 409-417. (doi:10.1139/z02-018)
42. Parker, G. A. 1974 Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. J. Theor. Biol. 47, 223-243. (doi:10. 1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8)
43. Parker, G. A. & Stuart, R. A. 1976 Animal behavior as a strategy optimizer: evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emigration thresholds. Am. Nat. 110, 1055-1076. (doi:10.1086/283126)
44. Popp, J. W. 1987 Resource value and dominance among American goldfinches. Bird Behav. 7, 73-77.
45. Prenter, J., Elwood, R. W. & Taylor, P. W. 2006 Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contests over precopula females in amphipods. Anim. Behav. 72, 861-868. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.023)
46. Rand, W. M. & Rand, A. S. 1976 Agonistic behavior in nesting iguanas: stochastic analysis of dispute settlement dominated by minimization of energy cost. Z. Tierpsychol. 40, 279-299.
47. Riechert, S. E. 1979 Games spiders play. II. Resource assessment strategies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6, 121-128. (doi:10.1007/BF00292558)
48. Riechert, S. E. 1984 Games spiders play. III. Cues underlying context-associated changes in agonistic behavior. Anim. Behav. 32, 1-15. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80318-8)
49. Rodriguez-Girones, M. A., Drummond, H. & Kacelnik, A. 1996 Effect of food deprivation on dominance status in blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii) broods. Behav. Ecol. 7, 82-88. (doi:10.1093/beheco/7.1.82)
50. Searcy, W. A. & Nowicki, S. 2005 The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems, 1st edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Sigurjonsdottir, H. & Parker, G. A. 1981 Dung fly struggles: evidence for assessment strategy. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8, 219-230. (doi:10.1007/BF00299834)
52. Szamado, S. 2000 Cheating as a mixed strategy in a simple model of aggressive communication. Anim. Behav. 59, 221-230. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1293)
53. Taylor, P. W. & Elwood, R. W. 2003 The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim. Behav. 65, 1195-1202. (doi:10. 1006/anbe.2003.2169)
54. Verrell, P. A. 1986 Wrestling in the red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens): resource value and contestant asymmetry determine contest duration and outcome. Anim. Behav. 34, 398-402. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472 (86)80108-7)
55. Zahavi, A. 1975 Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205-214. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75) 90111-3)