Response of murine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells to dry-etched porous silicon scaffolds

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 99 A, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 269-274

  Hajj Hassan, Mohamad ^a,b   Khayyat Kholghi, Maedeh ^a,c   Wang, Huifen ^a,c   Chodavarapu, Vamsy ^a   Henderson, Janet E ^a,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LEBANESE INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

mesenchymal stromal cell; porous silicon scaffold; xenon difluoride dry etching

Indexed keywords

BONE MARROW; DRY ETCHING TECHNIQUES; DRY-ETCH; DRYING STEP; FABRICATION PROCESS; HIGH DENSITY; MASK MATERIALS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; PORE CHARACTERISTICS; PRIMARY CULTURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROGRAPHS; SELECTIVE FORMATION; SINGLE CRYSTALLINE SILICON; SURFACE-TO-VOLUME RATIO; WET ETCHING TECHNIQUES; XENON DIFLUORIDE; XENON DIFLUORIDE DRY ETCHING;

BONE; CELL CULTURE; DRY ETCHING; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); PHOTORESISTS; PLASMA ETCHING; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEMICONDUCTING SILICON COMPOUNDS; SILICON WAFERS; WET ETCHING;

POROUS SILICON;

SILICON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XENON; XENON DIFLUORIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DENSITY; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL PROCEDURES; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRY ETCHING; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELL; MESENCHYME CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STROMA CELL; WET ETCHING;

ANIMALS; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL ADHESION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C3H; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POROSITY; SILICON; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 80053177316     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33103     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jones AL, Bucholz RW, Bosse MJ, Mirza SK, Lyon TR, Webb LX, Pollak AN, Golden JD, Valentin-Opran A; BMP-2 Evaluation in Surgery for Tibial Trauma-Allgraft (BESTT-ALL) Study Group. Recombinant human BMP-2 and allograft compared with autogenous bone graft for reconstruction of diaphyseal tibial fractures with cortical defects. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1431-1441.
2. Parker MJ, Raghavan R, Gurusamy K,. Incidence of fracture-healing complications after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 175-179. (Pubitemid 46701374)
3. Duque G,. Bone and fat connection in aging bone. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2008; 20: 429-434.
4. Lee K, Chan CK, Patil N, Goodman SB,. Cell therapy for bone regeneration-bench to bedside. J Biomed Mater Res B 2009; 89: 252-263.
5. El Tamer MK, Reis RL,. Progenitor and stem cells for bone and cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2009; 3: 327-337.
6. Harvey EJ, Henderson JE, Vengallatore ST,. Nanotechnology and bone healing. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24: S25-S30.
7. Ibasco S, Tamimi F, Meszaros R, Le Nihouannen D, Vengallatore S, Harvey E, Barralet JE. Magnesium-sputtered titanium for the formation of bioactive coatings. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 2338-2347.
8. Hench LL,. Biomaterials: A forecast for the future. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 1419-1423. (Pubitemid 28470667)
9. Wen CE, Yamada Y, Shimojima K, Chino Y, Asahina T, Mabuchi M,. Processing and mechanical properties of autogenous titanium implant materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 397-401. (Pubitemid 34284787)
10. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M,. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2161-2175. (Pubitemid 36434034)
11. Anderson SHC, Elliott H, Wallis DJ, Canham LT, Powell JJ,. Dissolution of different forms of partially porous silicon wafers under simulated physiological conditions. Phys Status Solid A 2003; 197: 331-335.
12. Coffer JL, Whitehead MA, Nagesha DK, Mukherjee P, Akkaraju G, Totolici M, Saffie RS, Canham LT. Porous silicon-based scaffolds for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Phys Status Solid A 2005; 202: 1451-1455. (Pubitemid 41364978)
13. Bellet D, Lamagnere P, Vincent A, Brechet Y,. Nanoindentation investigation of the Young's modulus of porous silicon. J Appl Phys 1996; 80: 3772-3776. (Pubitemid 126591083)
14. Canham LT,. Bioactive silicon structure fabrication through nanoetching techniques. Adv Mater 1995; 7: 1033-1037.
15. Low SP, Williams KA, Canham LT, Voelcker NH,. Evaluation of mammalian cell adhesion on surface-modified porous silicon. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4538-4546. (Pubitemid 43783226)
16. Khung YL, Barritt G, Voelcker NH,. Using continuous porous silicon gradients to study the influence of surface topography on the behaviour of neuroblastoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2008; 314: 789-800. (Pubitemid 351191903)
17. Whitehead MA, Fan D, Mukherjee P, Akkaraju GR, Canham LT, Coffer JL,. High-porosity poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/mesoporous silicon scaffolds: Calcium phosphate deposition and biological response to bone precursor cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2008; 14: 195-206. (Pubitemid 351520430)
18. Smith RL, Collins SD,. Porous silicon formation mechanisms. J Appl Phys 1992; 71: R1-R22.
19. Foll H, Christophersen M, Carstensen J, Hasse G,. Formation and application of porous silicon. Mater Sci Eng Res 2002; 39: 93-141.
20. de Vasconcelos EA, da Silva EF, dos Santos BECA, de Azevedo WM, Freire JAK,. A new method for luminescent porous silicon formation: Reaction-induced vapor-phase stain etch. Phys Status Solid A 2005; 202: 1539-1542. (Pubitemid 41364990)
21. Nakagawa T, Koyama H, Koshida N,. Control of structure and optical anisotropy in porous Si by magnetic-field assisted anodization. Appl Phys Lett 1996; 69: 3206-3208. (Pubitemid 126605856)
22. Escorcia-Garcia J, Martinez OS, Gracia-Jimenez JM, Agarwal V,. Porous silicon photonic devices using pulsed anodic etching of lightly doped silicon. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1992; 42: 145101.
23. Feng Z, Tsu R,. Porous Silicon. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing; 1994.
24. Bouchaour M, Ould-Abbas A, Diaf N, Sari NC,. Effect of drying on porous silicon. J Therm Anal Calorim 2004; 76: 677-684.
25. Hajj-Hassan M, Cheung M, Chodavarapu V,. Dry etch fabrication of porous silicon using xenon difluoride. Micro Nano Lett 2010; 5: 63-69.
26. Valverde-Franco G, Liu HL, Davidson D, Chai S, Valderrama-Carvajal H, Goltzman D, Ornitz DM, Henderson JE. Defective bone mineralization and osteopenia in young adult FGFR3(-/-) mice. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 271-284. (Pubitemid 38196167)
27. Richard S, Torabi N, Franco GV, Tremblay GA, Chen TP, Vogel G, Morel M, Cléroux P, Forget-Richard A, Komarova S, Tremblay ML, Li W, Li A, Gao YJ, Henderson JE. Ablation of the Sam68 RNA binding protein protects mice from age-related bone loss. PLoS Genet 2005; 1: 676-688.
28. Johnell O, Kanis JA,. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2006; 17: 1726-1733. (Pubitemid 44607392)
29. Gruber R, Koch H, Doll BA, Tegtmeier F, Einhorn TA, Hollinger JO,. Fracture healing in the elderly patient. Exp Gerontol 2006; 41: 1080-1093. (Pubitemid 44820727)
30. Parikh SN,. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 1301-1309.
31. Hak DJ,. The use of osteoconductive bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15: 525-536.
32. Rosa AL, de Oliveira PT, Beloti MM,. Macroporous scaffolds associated with cells to construct a hybrid biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Dev 2008; 5: 719-728.
33. Bitar M, Brown RA, Salih V, Kidane AG, Knowles JC, Nazhat SN,. Effect of cell density on osteoblastic differentiation and matrix degradation of biomimetic dense collagen scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9: 129-135. (Pubitemid 351201590)
34. Serpooshan V, Julien M, Nguyen O, Wang H, Li A, Muja N,. Reduced hydraulic permeability of three dimensional collagen scaffolds attenuates gel contraction and promotes the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 3978-3987.
35. Gao C, Nguyen O, Serpooshan V, ElChaarani B, Nazhat S, Harvey E,. Rodent model of adult stem cell transplantation for bone repair. J Can Ortho Assoc. Forthcoming.