Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Lugtenberg, Marjolein ^a,b   Burgers, Jako S ^b   Besters, Casper F ^b   Han, Dolly ^a   Westert, Gert P ^a,b  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; STROKE; THYROID DISEASE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; STROKE; THYROID DISEASES; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

EID: 80053173235     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-98     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T, Qual Health Care 1995 4 55 64 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55 10142039
2. Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP, Qual Saf Health Care 2009 18 385 392 10.1136/qshc.2008.028043 19812102
3. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT, Lancet 1993 342 1317 1322 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N 7901634 (Pubitemid 23345178)
4. Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. Grol R, JAMA 2001 286 2578 2585 10.1001/jama.286.20.2578 11722272 (Pubitemid 33096809)
5. Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Evidence (and its limitations) of the effectiveness of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies 1966-1998. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Thomas R, Maclennan G, Ramsay C, Fraser C, J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 14 S20 17083495
6. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the united states. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA, N Engl J Med 2003 348 2635 2645 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 12826639 (Pubitemid 36741592)
7. Braspenning J, Schellevis F, Grol R, Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Kwaliteit huisartsenzorg belicht. [The second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Quality of primary healthcare discussed] 2004 Nijmegen/Utrecht: WOK/NIVEL
8. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. Grol R, BMJ 1997 315 418 421 9277610 (Pubitemid 27346046)
9. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Grol R, Grimshaw J, Lancet 2003 362 1225 1230 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 14568747 (Pubitemid 37255352)
10. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PAC, Rubin HR, JAMA 1999 282 1458 1465 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 10535437 (Pubitemid 29493800)
11. Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, Burgers JS, Implement Sci 2009 4 54 10.1186/1748-5908-4-54 19674440
12. Barriers to optimal antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia at hospitals: a qualitative study. Schouten JA, Hulscher MEJL, Natsch S, Kullberg B-J, Van der Meer JWM, Grol RPTM, Quality Saf Health Care 2007 16 143 149 10.1136/qshc.2005.017327 (Pubitemid 46596455)
13. Barriers pediatricians face when using asthma practice guidelines. Cabana MD, Ebel BE, Cooper-Patrick L, Powe NR, Rubin HR, Rand CS, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000 154 685 693 10891020 (Pubitemid 30437550)
14. Guidelines on uncomplicated urinary tract infections are difficult to follow: perceived barriers and suggested interventions. Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Zegers-van Schaick JM, Westert GP, BMC Fam Pract 2010 11 51 10.1186/1471-2296-11-51 20584276
15. Cardol M, Van Dijk L, De Jong JD, De Bakker DH, Westert GP, Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: Huisartsenzorg: wat doet de poortwachter? [The second Dutch National Survey of General Practice: What does the gatekeeper do?] Utrecht, Bilthoven: NIVEL, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2004
16. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG). http://nhg.artsennet.nl
17. Stichting Kwaliteit en Opleiding Eerstelijnszorg (KOEL). http://www.stichtingkoel.nl
18. Ruimte voor verandering? Knelpunten en mogelijkheden voor verbeteringen in de patintenzorg. Peters MAJ, Harmsen M, Laurant MGH, Wensing M, Room for change? Barriers and facilitators for improvements in patient care Nijmegen: Afdeling Kwaliteit van zorg (WOK), UMC St Radboud 2003
19. Barriers and facilitator assessment instrument: introduction, instructions and instrument. Peters MAJ, Harmsen M, Laurant MGH, Wensing M, Nijmegen: Afdeling Kwaliteit van zorg (WOK), UMC St Radboud 2005
20. Hingstman L, Kenens RJ, Cijfers uit de registratie van huisartsen-peiling 2009. [Data from the registration of general practitioners 2009] Utrecht: NIVEL 2009
21. Internists' Attitudes about Clinical Practice Guidelines. Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, Rubin HR, Bass EB, Johnston M, Steinberg EP, Ann Intern Med 1994 120 956 8172440
22. Clinicians' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. Farquhar CM, Kofa EW, Slutsky JR, MJA 2002 177 502 12405894
23. General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. Watkins C, Harvey I, Langley C, Gray S, Faulkner A, Br J Gen Pract 1999 49 11 14 10622009
24. Attitudes to clinical guidelines - do GPs differ from other medical doctors? Carlsen B, Bringedal B, BMJ Qual Saf 2011 20 158 162 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034249 21209148
25. Clinical guidelines on depression: a qualitative study of GPs' views. Smith L, Walker A, Gilhooly K, J Fam Pract 2004 53 556 561 15251095 (Pubitemid 38944176)
26. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW, JAMA 2005 294 716 724 10.1001/jama.294.6.716 16091574 (Pubitemid 41159291)
27. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P, BMJ 2002 325 1263 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263 12458240
28. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Schunemann H, Fretheim A, Oxman A, Health Res Policy Syst 2006 4 22 10.1186/1478-4505-4-22 17147811 (Pubitemid 44961665)
29. The Next Step in Guideline Development. Krahn M, Naglie G, JAMA 2008 300 436 438 10.1001/jama.300.4.436 18647988 (Pubitemid 352040257)
30. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Van der Weijden T, Legare F, Boivin A, Burgers J, Van Veenendaal H, Stiggelbout A, Faber M, Elwyn G, Implement Sci 5 10
31. International Health Policy Survey 2010-Commonwealth Fund, Onderzoek onder burgers in 11 landen. Faber M, Burgers J, Voerman G, Grol R, Nijmegen: IQ healthcare, UMC St Radboud 2010
32. Achieving high performance quality in primary healthcare: the Dutch example. Faber MJ, Burgers JS, Grol R, Westert GP, Translational research for primary healthcare New York: NOVA Publishers, Bell E WG, Merrick J
33. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA, J Clin Epidemiol 1997 50 1129 1136 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1 9368521 (Pubitemid 27477990)
34. Effects of various methodologic strategies: Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Grava-Gubins I, Scott S, Can Fam Physician 2008 54 1424 1430 18854472
35. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D, Int J Qual Health Care 1999 11 187 192 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.187 10435838 (Pubitemid 29302446)
36. Which data source in clinical performance assessment? A pilot study comparing self-recording with patient records and observation. Spies TH, Mokkink HGA, De Vries Robbé PF, Grol RPTM, Int J Qual Health Care 2004 16 65 72 10.1093/intqhc/mzh001 15020562 (Pubitemid 38239822)