Protecting participants, promoting progress: Public perspectives on community advisory boards (CABs) in biobanking

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 19-30

  Simon, Christian M ^a   Newbury, Elizabeth ^a   L'Heureux, Jamie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Community advisory boards; Public perspectives

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSUMER; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; NUCLEIC ACID DATABASE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GOALS; HUMANS; IOWA; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 80053156727     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.19     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. BESKOW, L. M., BURKE, W., MERZ, J. F., BARR, P. A., TERRY, S., PENCHASZADEH, V. B. ET AL. (2001). Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(18), 2315-2321. (Pubitemid 33063154)
2. BRIELAND, D. (1971). Community advisory boards and maximum feasible participation. American Journal of Public Health, 61(2), 292-296.
3. CAMBON-THOMSEN, A., RIAL-SEBBAG, E., & KNOPPERS, B. M. (2007). Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. European Respiratory Journal, 30(2), 373-382. (Pubitemid 47194191)
4. CAMPBELL, A. V. (2009). The body in bioethics. London: Routledge.
5. COX, L. E., ROUFF, J. R., SVENDSEN, K. H., MARKOWITZ, M., & ABRAMS, D. I. (1998). Community advisory boards: Their role in AIDS clinical trials. Health and Social Work, 23(4), 290-297. (Pubitemid 128457794)
6. Cross-Cab Working Group. (2005). Defining best practices for community representation involvement in HIV clinical research networks. Washington, DC: Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Division of AIDS (DAIDS). Retrieved from http://www.hptn.org/web%20documents/ CommunityProgram/Cross-CabMeeting/DBPforCommunityMay6-82005Report.pdf.
7. ELGER, B., BILLER-ANDORNO, N., MAURON, A., & CAPRON, A. (Eds.). (2008). Ethical issues in governing biobanks: Global perspectives. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
8. ELGER, B. S. & CAPLAN, A. L. (2006). Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: Differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO Reports, 7(7), 661-666. (Pubitemid 43986258)
9. FLECK, L. M., MONGOVEN, A., & MARZEC, S. (2008). Informing the debate: Stored blood spots. Institute for Public Policy and Social Research: Michigan State University. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.ippsr.msu. edu/Publications/HPFleck.pdf.
10. FLEMING, J. M. (2007). Biobanks: Professional, donor and public perceptions of tissue banks and the ethical and legal challenges of consent, linkage and the disclosure of research results (Doctoral dissertation, Institute for Molecular Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia).
11. GOLDENBERG, A. J., HULL, S. C., WILFOND, B. S., & SHARP, R. R. (2011). Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research. Public Health Genomics, 14(3), 135-142.
12. HALLOWELL, N., COOKE, S., CRAWFORD, G., LUCASSEN, A., PARKER, M., & SNOWDON, C. (2010). Research ethics: An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(1), 37-45.
13. HEAD, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: Participation on whose terms? Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 441-454.
14. HEANEY, C., TINDALL, G., LUCAS, J., & HAGA, S. B. (2010). Researcher practices on returning genetic research results. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 14(6), 821-827.
15. HOEYER, K. (2010). Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: Time to acknowledge diversity? Public Health Genomics, 13(6), 345-352.
16. KAUFMAN, D. J., MURPHY-BOLLINGER, J., SCOTT, J., & HUDSON, K. L. (2009). Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(5), 643-654.
17. KOZANCZYN, C., COLLINS, K., & FERNANDEZ, C. V. (2007). Offering results to research subjects: U. S. institutional review board policy. Accountability in Research, 14(4), 255-267.
18. KRUEGER, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. LASKER, R. D. & WEISS, E. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14-60. (Pubitemid 37486153)
20. LEMKE, A. A., WOLF, W. A., HEBERT-BEIRNE, J., & SMITH, M. E. (2010). Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics, 13(6), 368-377.
21. LEVITT, M. (2003). Public consultation in bioethics: What's the point of consulting the public when they have neither scientific nor ethical expertise? Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 15-25. (Pubitemid 37129583)
22. MACLEAN, S. & BURGESS, M. M. (2010). In the public interest: Assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks. Public Understanding of Science, 19(4), 486-496.
23. MACQUEEN, K. M., MCLELLAN, E., METZGER, D. S., KEGELES, S., STRAUSS, R. P., SCOTTI, R. ET AL. (2001). What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), 1929-1938. (Pubitemid 33111636)
24. MASCHKE, K. J. (2008). Biobanks: DNA and research. In M. Crowley (Ed.), From birth to death and bench to clinic: The Hastings Center bioethics briefing book for journalists, policymakers, and campaigns (pp. 11-14). Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center.
25. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (2011). Mayo Clinic Biobank: Governing the biobank. Retrieved January 10, 2011 from http://mayoresearch.mayo.edu/biobank/biobank-governing.cfm.
26. MCCARTY, C. A., CHAPMAN-STONE, D., DERFUS, T., GIAMPIETRO, P. F., & FOST, N. (2008). Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: The Marshfield Clinic personalized medicine research project. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 146 A (23), 3026-3033. (Pubitemid 352774642)
27. MCKELVEY, M. D., RICKNE, A., & LAAGE-HELLMAN, J. (2004). The economic dynamics of modern biotechnology. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
28. MEACHAM, M. C., STARKS, H., BURKE, W., & EDWARDS, K. (2010). Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 31-41.
29. MELTON, G. B., LEVINE, R. J., KOOCHER, G. P., ROSENTHAL, R., & THOMPSON, W. C. (1988). Community consultation in socially sensitive research: Lessons from clinical trials of treatments for AIDS. American Psychologist, 43(7), 573-581.
30. Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH). Michigan BioTrust for health-Advisory boards (2001-2011). Retrieved January 10, 2011 from http://www.michigan. gov/mdch/0, 1607, 7-132-2942-4911-4916-244424-, 00.html.
31. MURPHY, J., SCOTT, J., KAUFMAN, D., GELLER, G., LEROY, L., & HUDSON, K. (2009). Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2128-2134.
32. National Institutes of Health. (2010). NIH Public Bulletin: Conference explores the science of community engagement. Retrieved January 10, 2011 from http://getinvolved.nih.gov/newsbulletins/Esingle.asp?id=944&issue=april2010.
33. O'DOHERTY, K. C. & BURGESS, M. M. (2009). Engaging the public on biobanks: Outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation. Public Health Genomics, 12(4), 203-215.
34. O'DOHERTY, K. C. & HAWKINS, A. (2010). Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking. Public Health Genomics, 13(4), 197-206.
35. QUINN, S. C. (2004). Ethics in public health research: Protecting human subjects-The role of community advisory boards. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 918-922. (Pubitemid 38691533)
36. ROSNOW, R. L., ROTHERAM-BORUS, M. J., CECI, S. J., BLANCK, P. D., & KOOCHER, G. P. (1993). The institutional review board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards. American Psychologist, 48(7), 821-826.
37. SALTER, B. & JONES, M. (2005). Biobanks and bioethics: The politics of legitimation. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 710-732. (Pubitemid 41053338)
38. SHUBIS, K., JUMA, O., SHARIFU, R., BURGESS, B., & ABDULLA, S. (2009). Challenges of establishing a community advisory board (CAB) in a low-income, low-resource setting: Experiences from Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(1), 16.
39. SIMON, C. M., L'HEUREUX, J., MURRAY, J. C., WINOKUR, P., WEINER, G., & NEWBURY, E., SHINKUNAS, L., & ZIMMERMAN, B. (2011). Active choice, but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genetics in Medicine [ahead of print]. DOI:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d2f88.
40. TUTTON, R. (2010). Biobanking: Social, political and ethical aspects. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
41. VAUGHT, J. B., CABOUX, E., & HAINAUT, P. (2010). International efforts to develop biospecimen best practices. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 19(4), 912-915.
42. WATSON, P. H., WILSON-MCMANUS, J. E., BARNES, R. O., GIESZ, S. C., PNG, A., HEGELE, R. G. ET AL. (2009). Evolutionary concepts in biobanking: The BC BioLibrary. Journal of Translational Medicine, 7(1), 95.
43. WESTFALL, J. M., VANVORST, R. F., MAIN, D. S., & HERBERT, C. (2006). Community-based participatory research in practicebased research networks. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(1), 8-14. (Pubitemid 43243907)
44. WINICKOFF, D. E. & WINICKOFF, R. N. (2003). The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(12), 1180-1184. (Pubitemid 37122332)
45. WOLF, L. E., CATANIA, J. A., DOLCINI, M. M., POLLACK, L. M., & LO, B. (2008). IRB chairs' perspectives on genomics research involving stored biological materials: Ethical concerns and proposed solutions. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 99-111.