Protecting human subjects: The role of community advisory boards

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 918-922

  Quinn, Sandra Crouse ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY; CONSULTATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2542444547     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.94.6.918     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. The Belmont Report. Ethical Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1979.
2. Gostin L. Ethical principles for the conduct of human subject research: population-based research and ethics. Law Med Health Care. 1991;19: 191-201.
3. Weijer C. Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999;8:501-513.
4. Levine R. Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. Baltimore, Md: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1986.
5. McCarthy C. North American perspective. In: Bankowshi Z, Howard-Jones N, eds. Human Experimentation and Medical Ethics: Proceedings of the XV CIOMS Round Table Conference. Geneva, Switzerland: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 1993:208-211.
6. King N, Henderson G, Stein J. Introduction-relationships in research: a new paradigm In: King N, Henderson G, Stein J, eds. Beyond Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 1999:1-17
7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for institutional review boards, clinical investigators and sponsors: Exceptions from informed consent requirements for emergency research. Available at: http://www.fda. gov/ora/compliance_ref/bimo/emrfinal.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2004.
8. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Available at: http://www. georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/hbm.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2004.
9. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Report of the first community consultation on the responsible collections and use of samples for genetic research. 2000. Available at: http//www. nigms.nih.gov/news/reports/community_ consultation.html/communities. Accessed June 23, 2003.
10. Schulz A, Foster S, Caldwell C, Modell S, Singer E. 1999/2000 focus group content report: communities of color and genetics public policy project. 2000. Available at: http://www.sph.umich.edu/genpolicy/current/reports.html. Accessed April 15, 2001.
11. Sharp R, Foster M. Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics. 2000;28: 41-51.
12. The National Hispanic/Latino Cancer Network. Redes en accion, news: nationwide Latino genetics conference held June 22-24, 2003. Available at: http://www.redesenaccion.org/news. Accessed September 17, 2003.
13. Kone A, Sullivan M, Senturia K, Chrisman N, Ciske S, Krieger J. Improving collaboration between researchers and communities. Public Health Rep. 2000;115:243-248.
14. Weijer C, Emanuel E. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science. 2000;289:1142-1144.
15. Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E, Becker A. Review of community based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.
16. Strauss R, Sengupta S, Quinn S, et al. The role of community advisory boards: involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1938-1943.
17. Galea S, Factor S, Bonner S, et al. Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:530-539.
18. Galea S, Factor S, Palermo A, Aaron D, Canales E, Vlahov D. Access to resources for substance users in Harlem, New York City: service provider and client perspectives. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29:296-311.
19. Factor S, Galea S, De Duenas Geli L, et al. Development of a "survival guide" for substance users in Harlem, New York City. Health Educ Behav. 2002;29: 312-325.
20. HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN). HIV prevention trials network community advisory boards (CABs) guidelines. Available at: http://www. hptn.org/community_program/cab_ guidelines.htm. Accessed June 13, 2003.
21. Morin S. Enhancing community participation in HIV prevention research. Available at: http://ari.ucsf.edu/pdf/Posters/barcelona/morin.pdf Accessed June 26, 2003.
22. Federman D, Hanna K, Rodriguez L, eds. Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2003.
23. King N, Henderson, G, Stein J. Conclusion. regulations and relationships: toward a new synthesis. In: King N, Henderson G, Stein J, eds. Beyond Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 1999:213-224.