Software product line adoption - Guidelines from a case study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4980 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 143-157

  Kuvaja, Pasi ^a   Similä, Jouni ^a   Hanhela, Hanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b Digia   (Finland)

Author keywords

adoption; adoption model; adoption strategy; guidelines; software product line

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ADOPTION MODEL; ADOPTION STRATEGY; GUIDELINES; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EVALUATION CRITERIA; GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATION; RESEARCH RESULTS;

INVESTMENTS; RESEARCH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 80053153703     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22386-0_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Sugumaran, V., Park, S., Kang, K.C.: Software product line engineering. Communications of the ACM 49(12), 28-32 (2006)
2. Bosch, J.: On the development of software product-family components. LNCS, pp. 146-164. Springer, Berlin (2004)
3. Birk, A., Heller, G., John, I., Schmid, K., Von der Massen, T., Muller, K., et al.: Product line engineering: The state of the practice. IEEE Software 20(6), 52-60 (2003)
4. Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software product lines: Practices and patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)
5. Clements, P.C., Jones, L.G., McGregor, J.D., Northrop, L.M.: Getting there from here: A roadmap for software product line adoption. Communications of the ACM 49(12), 33-36 (2006)
6. Bosch, J.: Maturity and evolution in software product lines: Approaches, artefacts and organization. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 257-271. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
7. Böckle, G., Munoz, J.B., Knauber, P., Krueger, C.W., do Prado Leite, S., Cesar, J., Van der Linden, F., et al.: Adopting and institutionalizing a product line culture. LNCS, pp. 1-8. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
8. Krueger, C.: Eliminating the adoption barrier. IEEE Software 19(4), 29-31 (2002)
9. McGregor, J.D., Northrop, L.M., Jarrad, S., Pohl, K.: Initiating software product lines. IEEE Software 19(4), 24-27 (2002)
10. Schmid, K., Verlage, M.: The economic impact of product line adoption and evolution. IEEE Software 19(4), 50-57 (2002)
11. Brownsword, L., Clements, P.C.: A case study in successful product line development. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1996)
12. Donohoe, P.: Software product lines: Experience and research directions. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
13. Jaaksi, A.: Developing mobile browsers in a product line. IEEE Software 19(4), 73-80 (2002)
14. Kiesgen, T., Verlage, M.: Five years of product line engineering in a small company. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 534-543 (2005)
15. Meyer, M.H., Lehnerd, A.P.: The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership. Free Press, New York (1997)
16. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Van der Linden, F.: Software product line engineering: Foundations, principles, and techniques. Springer, Berlin (2005)
17. Weiss, D.M., Lai, C.T.R.: Software product-line engineering: A family-based software development process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
18. Hetrick, W.A., Krueger, C.W., Moore, J.G.: Incremental return on incremental investment: Engenio's transition to software product line practice. In: Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications, pp. 798-804 (2006)
19. Northrop, L.M.: SEI's software product line tenets. IEEE Software 19(4), 32-40 (2002)
20. Bosch, J., Florijn, G., Greefhorst, D., Kuusela, J., Obbink, H., Pohl, K.: Variability issues in software product lines. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 13-338. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
21. Jaring, M., Bosch, J.: Representing variability in software product lines: A case study. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 15-22. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
22. Coplien, J., Hoffman, D., Weiss, D.: Commonality and variability in software engineering. IEEE Software 15(6), 37-45 (1998)
23. Van der Linden, F.: Software product families in Europe: The esaps & cafe projects. IEEE Software 19(4), 41-49 (2002)
24. Bosch, J.: Design and use of software architectures: Adopting and evolving a product-line approach. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (2000)
25. Mohagheghi, P., Conradi, R.: Different aspects of product family adoption. In: Software Product Family Engineering, pp. 459-464. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
26. Wijnstra, J.G.: Critical Factors for a Successful Platform-Based Product Family Approach. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 68-3349. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
27. Bosch, J.: Software product lines: Organizational alternatives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 91-100 (2001)
28. Stoermer, C., Roeddiger, M.: Introducing Product Lines in Small Embedded Systems. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 101-112. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
29. Knauber, P., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., Wide, T.: Applying product line concepts in small and medium-sized companies. IEEE Software 17(5), 88-95 (2000)
30. Krueger, C.W.: New methods in software product line practice. Communications of the ACM 49(12), 37-40 (2006)
31. Frakes, W.B., Kang, K.: Software reuse research: Status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(7), 529-536 (2005)
32. Simon, D., Eisenbarth, T.: Evolutionary introduction of software product lines. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 1611-3349. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
33. Myllymäki, T., Koskimies, K., Mikkonen, T.: Structuring product-lines: A layered architectural style (2002)
34. Thiel, S.: On the Definition of a Framework for an Architecting Process Supporting Product Family Development. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 47-125. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
35. Krueger, C.W.: Easing the transition to software mass customization. In: Proceedings of the Distal Seminar No.01161: Product Family Development (2002)
36. Bayer, J., Flege, O., Knauber, P., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Schmid, K., et al.: PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. In: SSR 1999: Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability, Los Angeles, California, United States, pp. 122-131 (1999)
37. Van der Linden, F., Bosch, J., Kamsties, E., Känsälä, K., Obbink, H.: Software product family evaluation. LNCS, pp. 110-129. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
38. Northrop, L.M.: Software product line adoption roadmap. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (2004)
39. Kolb, R., Muthig, D., Patzke, T., Yamauchi, K.: A case study in refactoring a legacy component for reuse in a product line. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 369-378 (2005)
40. Schmid, K., John, I., Kolb, R., Meier, G.: Introducing the PuLSE approach to an embedded system population at Testo AG. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 544-552 (2005)
41. Donohoe, P., Jones, L., Northrop, L.: Examining product line readiness: Experiences with the SEI product line technical probe. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Software Product Line Conference (2005)
42. Northrop, L.M., Clements, P.C.: A framework for software product line practice (2007), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/framework.html (retrieved 05/03, 2007)
43. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)