Non-standard neutrino interactions at one loop

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2011, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Bellazzini, Brando ^a   Grossman, Yuval ^a   Nachshon, Itay ^a   Paradisi, Paride ^b  

^a Newman Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053148016     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2011)104     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and Y. Nir, Developments in neutrino physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 345 [hep-ph/0202058] [SPIRES].
2. M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M.A. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Status of global fits to neutrino oscillations, New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 122 [hep-ph/0405172] [SPIRES].
3. A. Strumia and F. Vissani, Neutrino masses and mixings and.., hep-ph/0606054 [SPIRES].
4. T. Schwetz, M.A. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Three-avour neutrino oscillation update, New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 113011 [arXiv:0808.2016] [SPIRES].
5. P. Minkowski, → e at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [SPIRES].
6. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky Complex spinors and Unified theories, in Supergravity, F. Nieuwenhuizen and D. Friedman eds., North Holland, Amsterdam The Netherlands (1979).
7. T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Unified Theories and the Baryon Number of the Universe, O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto eds., KEK, Japan (1979).
8. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovific, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [SPIRES].
9. J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [SPIRES].
10. L.J. Hall, V.A. Kostelecky and S. Raby, New avor violations in supergravity models, Nucl. Phys. B 267 (1986) 415 [SPIRES].
11. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Large muon and electron number violations in supergravity theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 961 [SPIRES].
12. L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2369 [SPIRES].
13. S.P. Mikheev and A.Yu. Smirnov, Resonance ampličation of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of solar neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1985) 913 [Yad. Fiz. 42 (1985) 1441] [SPIRES].
14. E. Roulet, Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect with avor-changing neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 935 [SPIRES].
15. M.M. Guzzo, A. Masiero and S.T. Petcov, On the MSW effect with massless neutrinos and no mixing in the vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 260 (1991) 154 [SPIRES].
16. A.M. Gago, M.M. Guzzo, H. Nunokawa, W.J.C. Teves and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Probing avor changing neutrino interactions using neutrino beams from a muon storage ring, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 073003 [hep-ph/0105196] [SPIRES].
17. N. Fornengo, M. Maltoni, R. Tomas and J.W.F. Valle, Probing neutrino non-standard interactions with atmospheric neutrino data, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 013010 [hep-ph/0108043] [SPIRES].
18. Y. Grossman, Nonstandard neutrino interactions and neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Lett. B 359 (1995) 141 [hep-ph/9507344] [SPIRES].
19. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Y. Grossman, A. Gusso and Y. Nir, New CP-violation in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 096006 [hep-ph/0105159] [SPIRES].
20. T. Ota, J. Sato and N.-a. Yamashita, Oscillation enhanced search for new interaction with neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 093015 [hep-ph/0112329] [SPIRES].
21. T. Ota and J. Sato, Can ICARUS and OPERA give information on a new physics?, Phys. Lett. B 545 (2002) 367 [hep-ph/0202145] [SPIRES].
22. A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, A test of τ neutrino interactions with atmospheric neutrinos and K2K, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 053009 [hep-ph/0506143] [SPIRES].
23. N. Kitazawa, H. Sugiyama and O. Yasuda, Will MINOS see new physics?, hep-ph/0606013 [SPIRES].
24. A. Friedland and C. Lunardini, Two modes of searching for new neutrino interactions at MINOS, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033012 [hep-ph/0606101] [SPIRES].
25. M. Blennow, T. Ohlsson and J. Skrotzki, Effects of non-standard interactions in the MINOS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 522 [hep-ph/0702059] [SPIRES].
26. M. Blennow, D. Meloni, T. Ohlsson, F. Terranova and M. Westerberg, Non-standard interactions using the OPERA experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 529 [arXiv:0804.2744] [SPIRES].
27. S. Antusch, M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez and T. Ota, New physics searches at near detectors of neutrino oscillation experiments, JHEP 06 (2010) 068 [arXiv:1005.0756] [SPIRES].
28. M. Carpentier and S. Davidson, Constraints on two-lepton, two quark operators, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010) 1071 [arXiv:1008.0280] [SPIRES].
29. C. Biggio, M. Blennow and E. Fernandez-Martinez, Loop bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 03 (2009) 139 [arXiv:0902.0607] [SPIRES].
30. C. Biggio, M. Blennow and E. Fernandez-Martinez, General bounds on non-standard neutrino interactions, JHEP 08 (2009) 090 [arXiv:0907.0097] [SPIRES].
31. T. Ohlsson and H. Zhang, Non-standard interaction effects at reactor neutrino experiments, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 99 [arXiv:0809.4835] [SPIRES].
32. J. Kopp, M. Lindner and T. Ota, Discovery reach for non-standard interactions in a neutrino factory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 013001 [hep-ph/0702269] [SPIRES].
33. J. Kopp, M. Lindner, T. Ota and J. Sato, Non-standard neutrino interactions in reactor and superbeam experiments, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013007 [arXiv:0708.0152] [SPIRES].
34. N.C. Ribeiro, H. Minakata, H. Nunokawa, S. Uchinami and R. Zukanovich-Funchal, Probing non-standard neutrino interactions with neutrino factories, JHEP 12 (2007) 002 [arXiv:0709.1980] [SPIRES].
35. J. Holeczek, J. Kisiel, J. Syska and M. Zralek, Searching for new physics in future neutrino factory experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C 52 (2007) 905 [arXiv:0706.1442] [SPIRES].
36. S. Goswami and T. Ota, Testing non-unitarity of neutrino mixing matrices at neutrino factories, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033012 [arXiv:0802.1434] [SPIRES].
37. S. Antusch, M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martńez and J. Lopez-Pavon, Probing non-unitary mixing and CP-violation at a Neutrino Factory, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 033002 [arXiv:0903.3986] [SPIRES].
38. G. Altarelli and D. Meloni, CP violation in neutrino oscillations and new physics, Nucl. Phys. B 809 (2009) 158 [arXiv:0809.1041] [SPIRES].
39. ISS Physics Working Group collaboration, A. Bandyopadhyay et al., Physics at a future neutrino factory and super-beam facility, Rept. Prog. Phys. 72 (2009) 106201 [arXiv:0710.4947] [SPIRES].
40. B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and antimesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 429 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1957) 549] [SPIRES].
41. Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Remarks on the Unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870 [SPIRES].
42. S. Antusch, C. Biggio, E. Fernandez-Martinez, M.B. Gavela and J. Lopez-Pavon, Unitarity of the leptonic mixing matrix, JHEP 10 (2006) 084 [hep-ph/0607020] [SPIRES].
43. A.J. Buras, M.V. Carlucci, S. Gori and G. Isidori, Higgs-mediated FCNCs: Natural avour conservation vs. minimal avour violation, JHEP 10 (2010) 009 [arXiv:1005.5310] [SPIRES].
44. L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309] [SPIRES].
45. T. Blazek, S. Raby and S. Pokorski, Finite supersymmetric threshold corrections to CKM matrix elements in the large tan β regime, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4151 [hep-ph/9504364] [SPIRES].
46. C. Hamzaoui, M. Pospelov and M. Toharia, Higgs-mediated FCNC in supersymmetric models with large tanβ, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 095005 [hep-ph/9807350] [SPIRES].
47. -in minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 228 [hep-ph/9909476] [SPIRES].
48. G. Isidori and A. Retico, Scalar avor changing neutral currents in the large tan beta limit, JHEP 11 (2001) 001 [hep-ph/0110121] [SPIRES].
49. G. D'Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal avour violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [SPIRES].
50. -and B → Xs in supersymmetry at large tanβ, Nucl. Phys. B 659 (2003) 3 [hep-ph/0210145][SPIRES].
51. A. Dedes and A. Pilaftsis, Resummed effective Lagrangian for Higgs-mediated FCNC interactions in the CP-violating MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 015012 [hep-ph/0209306] [SPIRES].
52. J. Foster, K.-i. Okumura and L. Roszkowski, Probing the avour structure of supersymmetry breaking with rare B-processes: A beyond leading order analysis, JHEP 08 (2005) 094 [hep-ph/0506146] [SPIRES].
53. J. Hisano, M. Nagai and P. Paradisi, Flavor effects on the electric dipole moments in supersymmetric theories: A beyond leading order analysis, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095014 [arXiv:0812.4283] [SPIRES].
54. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356 [SPIRES].
55. K.S. Babu and C. Kolda, Higgs-mediated τ → 3μ in the supersymmetric seesaw model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 241802 [hep-ph/0206310] [SPIRES].
56. M. Sher, τ → μ in supersymmetric models, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 057301 [hep-ph/0207136] [SPIRES].
57. A. Brignole and A. Rossi, Anatomy and phenomenology of μτ lepton avour violation in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 701 (2004) 3 [hep-ph/0404211] [SPIRES].
58. E. Arganda, M.J. Herrero and J. Portoles, Lepton avour violating semileptonic tau decays in constrained MSSM-seesaw scenarios, JHEP 06 (2008) 079 [arXiv:0803.2039] [SPIRES].
59. A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and R. Petronzio, Probing new physics through μe universality in K → lv, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 011701 [hep-ph/0511289] [SPIRES].
60. A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and R. Petronzio, Anatomy and phenomenology of the lepton avor universality in SUSY theories, JHEP 11 (2008) 042 [arXiv:0807.4721] [SPIRES].
61. J. Ellis, S. Lola and M. Raidal, Supersymmetric grand unification and lepton universality in K → lv decays, Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 128 [arXiv:0809.5211] [SPIRES].
62. A. Filipuzzi and G. Isidori, Violations of lepton-avour universality in P → lv decays: A model-independent analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 64 (2009) 55 [arXiv:0906.3024] [SPIRES].
63. s), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [SPIRES].
64. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG) collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron properties at the end of 2006, arXiv:0704.3575 [SPIRES].
65. Belle collaboration, P. Koppenburg et al., An inclusive measurement of the photon energy spectrum in b → s decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 061803 [hep-ex/0403004] [SPIRES].
66. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Measurement of the branching fraction and photon energy moments of B → Xs and A(CP)(B → Xs+d), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 171803 [hep-ex/0607071] [SPIRES].
67. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and G.F. Giudice, B → Xs in supersymmetry: Large contributions beyond the leading order, JHEP 12 (2000) 009 [hep-ph/0009337] [SPIRES].
68. M.S. Carena, D. Garcia, U. Nierste and C.E.M. Wagner, B → S and supersymmetry with large tanβ, Phys. Lett. B 499 (2001) 141 [hep-ph/0010003] [SPIRES].
69. Belle collaboration, K. Ikado et al., Evidence of the purely leptonic decay B-→ τ nu=τ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 251802 [hep-ex/0604018] [SPIRES].
70. +v with Hadronic B tags, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 011107 [arXiv:0708.2260] [SPIRES].
71. 0l- v̄X, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 051101 [arXiv:0809.4027] [SPIRES].
72. -v̄τ Decay with a Semileptonic Tagging Method, arXiv:0809.3834 [SPIRES].
73. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and phenomenology of FCNC and CPV effects in SUSY theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333] [SPIRES].
74. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., An improved standard model prediction of BR(B → τv) and its implications for new physics, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 61 [arXiv:0908.3470] [SPIRES].
75. A. Lenz et al., Anatomy of new physics in B-B̄ mixing, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 036004 [arXiv:1008.1593] [SPIRES].
76. W.-S. Hou, Enhanced charged Higgs boson effects in B-→τ anti-neutrino,μ anti-neutrino and B → τ anti-neutrino + X, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2342 [SPIRES].
77. A.G. Akeroyd and S. Recksiegel, The effect of H± on B± →±vτ and B± →± vμ, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2311 [hep-ph/0306037] [SPIRES].
78. G. Isidori and P. Paradisi, Hints of large tanβ in avour physics, Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 499 [hep-ph/0605012] [SPIRES].
79. B. Grzadkowski and W.-S. Hou, Solutions to the B meson semileptonic branching ratio puzzle within two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Lett. B 272 (1991) 383 [SPIRES].
80. B. Grzadkowski and W.-S. Hou, Searching for B → Dτ anti-τ-neutrino at the 10-percent level, Phys. Lett. B 283 (1992) 427 [SPIRES].
81. M. Tanaka, Charged Higgs effects on exclusive semitauonic B decays, Z. Phys. C 67 (1995) 321 [hep-ph/9411405] [SPIRES].
82. H. Itoh, S. Komine and Y. Okada, Tauonic B decays in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114 (2005) 179 [hep-ph/0409228] [SPIRES].
83. -v̄τ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021801 [arXiv:0709.1698] [SPIRES].
84. -- v̄τ , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 092002 [arXiv:0902.2660] [SPIRES].
85. T. Iijima, Rare B Decays, talk given at the 24th International Symposium On Lepton-Photon Interactions At High Energy (LP09), August 17-22, Hamburg, Germany (2009).
86. J.F. Kamenik and F. Mescia, B → Dτv branching ratios: Opportunity for lattice QCD and hadron colliders , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 014003 [arXiv:0802.3790] [SPIRES].
87. T. Ota and J. Sato, Signature of the minimal supersymmetric standard model with right-handed neutrinos in long baseline experiments, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 096004 [hep-ph/0502124] [SPIRES].
88. J. Rosiek, Complete set of Feynman rules for the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3464 [SPIRES].