τ→μ η in supersymmetric models

Physical Review D

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2002, Pages

  Sher, Marc ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYSICS;

EID: 0036710295     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.057301     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. SuperKamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3999 (2000).
2. If the Majorana neutrinos are very heavy, there can be muon and tau number nonconservation in Higgs boson decays; A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Lett. B 285, 68 (1992), as well as in rare electronic tau decays;
3. A. Ilakovac, B.A. Kniehl, and A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3993 (1995).
4. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 961 (1986).
5. SuperKamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5656 (2001);
6. SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. ibid. 87, 071301 (2001);
7. Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
8. K.S. Babu and C. Kolda, hep-ph/0206310.
9. D.F. Carvalho, J. Ellis, M.E. Gomez, S. Lola, and J.C. Romao, hep-ph/0206148.
10. I. Hinchliffe and F.E. Paige, Phys. Rev. D 63, 115006 (2001).
11. J.L. Feng, Y. Nir, and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Rev. D 61, 113005 (2000).
12. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B477, 321 (1996).
13. J. Kalinowski, hep-ph/0207051.
14. J. Hisano, M.M. Nojiri, Y. Shimizu, and M. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 60, 055008 (1999).
15. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 357, 579 (1995);
16. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996);
17. J. Hisano and D. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 59, 116005 (1999);
18. J.R. Ellis, M.E. Gomez, G.K. Leontaris, S. Lola, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 319 (2000);
19. W. Buchmuller, D. Delepine, and L.T. Handoko, Nucl. Phys. BS76, 445 (2000);
20. J.L. Feng, Y. Mir, and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Rev. D 61, 113005 (2000);
21. J. Sato and K. Tobe, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 63, 116010 (2001);
22. S. Lavignac, I. Masina, and C.A. Savoy, Phys. Lett. B 520, 269 (2001);
23. J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Nucl. Phys. B618, 171 (2000);
24. A. Rossi, hep-ph/0207006.
25. K.S. Babu and C. Kolda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 228 (2000).
26. D. Black, T. Han, H.-J. He, and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D (to be published), hep-ph/0206056.
27. T. Feldmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 159 (2000).
28. CLEO Collaboration, G. Bonvicini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1221 (1997).
29. CLEO Collaboration, D.W. Bliss et al., Phys. Rev. D 57, 5903 (1998).
30. 0 with a large branching ratio. Although we have not done a detailed analysis of the bound in this case, it is probably ruled out by universality, since it would appear as a universality-violating leptonic τ decay. We thus assume the neutralino is heavier than the τ.