Cell-printing and transfer technology applications for bone defects in mice

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 695-703

  Tsugawa, Junichi ^a   Komaki, Motohiro ^a   Yoshida, Tomoko ^a   Nakahama, Ken Ichi ^a   Amagasa, Teruo ^a   Morita, Ikuo ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Amniotic membrane; Cell implantation; Cell printing cell transfer; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CYTOLOGY; EFFICIENCY; MAMMALS; MEMBRANES; OSTEOBLASTS; STEM CELLS;

AMNIOTIC MEMBRANES; BONE DEFECT; BONE REGENERATION; CALVARIAL BONES; CELL IMPLANTATION; CELL PRINTING; CELL PRINTING CELL TRANSFER; CELL TRANSFER; PRINTING TECHNOLOGIES; TRANSFER TECHNOLOGIES;

SUBSTRATES;

GLASS; MACROGOL;

AMNION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; BONE REGENERATION; CALVARIA; CELL ADHESION; CELL EQUIPPED AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE; CELL TRANSFER; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGRAFTMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INOCULATION; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 80053138378     PISSN: 19326254     EISSN: 19327005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/term.366     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Akahane M, Nakamura A, Ohgushi H, et al. 2008; Osteogenic matrix sheet-cell transplantation using osteoblastic cell sheet resulted in bone formation without scaffold at an ectopic site. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2: 196-201.
2. Akahori T, Kobayashi A, Komaki M, et al. 2010; Implantation of capillary structure engineered by optical lithography improves hind limb ischemia in mice. Tissue Eng A 16: 953-959.
3. Colnot C. 2008; Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J Bone Miner Res 2: 274-282.
4. Hidetsugu T, Paola RA, Hitoshi N, et al. 2007; Mechanism of bone induction by kusa/a1 cells using atelocollagen honeycomb scaffold. J Biomed Sci 14: 255-263.
5. Kobayashi A, Miyake H, Hattori H, et al. 2007; In vitro formation of capillary networks using optical lithographic techniques. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 692-697.
6. Lima F, Niger C, Hebert C, et al. 2009; Connexin43 potentiates osteoblasts responsiveness to fibroblast growth factor 2 via a protein kinase C-Δ/Runx2-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 20: 2697-2708.
7. Matsumoto S, Shibuya I, Kusakari S, et al. 2005; Membranous osteogenesis system modeled with kusa-a1 mature osteoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1725: 57-63.
8. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. 2007; Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 78: 377-394.
9. Montjovent MO, Mathieu L, Schmoekel H, et al. 2007; Repair of critical size defects in the rat cranium using ceramic-reinforced pla scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming. J Biomed Mater Res A 83: 41-51.
10. Mukai N, Akahori T, Komaki M, et al. 2008; A comparison of the tube-forming potentials of early and late endothelial progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 314: 430-440.
11. Okamoto M, Dohi Y, Ohgushi H, et al. 2006; Influence of the porosity of hydroxyapatite ceramics on in vitro and in vivo bone formation by cultured rat bone marrow stromal cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 17: 327-336.
12. Otsuru S, Tamai K, Yamazaki T, et al. 2008; Circulating bone marrow-derived osteoblast progenitor cells are recruited to the bone-forming site by the cxcr4/stromal cell-derived factor-1 pathway. Stem Cells 26: 223-234.
13. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. 1999; Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284: 143-147.
14. Rodriguez AP, Missana L, Nagatsuka H, et al. 2006; Efficacy of atelocollagen honeycomb scaffold in bone formation using kusa/a1 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 77: 707-717.
15. Saijo H, Chung UI, Igawa K, et al. 2008; Clinical application of artificial bone in the maxillofacial region. J Artif Organs 11: 171-176.
16. Shindo K, Kawashima N, Sakamoto K, et al. 2003; Osteogenic differentiation of the mesenchymal progenitor cells; kusa is suppressed by notch signaling. Exp Cell Res 290: 370-380.
17. Tasso R, Fais F, Reverberi D, et al. 2010; The recruitment of two consecutive and different waves of host stem/progenitor cells during the development of tissue-engineered bone in a murine model. Biomaterials 31: 2121-2129.
18. Walsh WR, Vizesi F, Michael D, et al. 2008; β-tcp bone graft substitutes in a bilateral rabbit tibial defect model. Biomaterials 29: 266-271.
19. Yoneda S, Itoh D, Kuroda S, et al. 2003; The effects of enamel matrix derivative (emd) on osteoblastic cells in culture and bone regeneration in a rat skull defect. J Periodontal Res 38: 333-342.
20. Yoshikawa M, Tsuji N, Shimomura Y, et al. 2008; Osteogenesis depending on geometry of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Calcif Tissue Int 83: 139-145.