Does a color difference between parts impair the perception of a whole? A similarity between simultanagnosia patients and healthy observers

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 877-882

  Goldfarb, Liat ^a   Treisman, Anne ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Object file; Perception; Simultanagnosia; Visual search

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053121757     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0123-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beaudot, W. H. A., & Mullen, K. T. (2001). Processing time of contour integration: Therole of color, contrast and curvature. Perception, 30, 833-853.
2. Boring, E. G. (1930). A new ambiguous figure. The American Journal of Psychology, 42, 444-445.
3. Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 16-25.
4. Feldman, J. (1999). The role of objects in perceptual grouping. Acta Psychologica, 102, 137-163.
5. Gilchrist, I. D., Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Neumann, H. (1997). Luminance and edge information in grouping: A study using visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 464-480.
6. Goldfarb, L., & Treisman, A. (in press). Repetition blindness: The survival of the grouped. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
7. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration. Visual Cognition, 17, 120-140.
8. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
9. Kirby, K. N., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1990). Thinking visually. Mind and Language, 5, 324-341.
10. Lamme, V. A., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Neuronal synchrony does not represent texture segregation. Nature, 396, 362-366.
11. Luria, A. R. (1959). Disorders of "simultaneous perception" in a case of bilateral occipito-parietal brain injury. Brain, 83, 437-449.
12. Raffone, A., & Wolters, G. (2001). A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 766-785.
13. Reed, S. K. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images. Memory & Cognition, 2, 319-336.
14. Riddoch, M. J., Chechlacz, M., Mevorach, C., Mavritsaki, E., Allen, H., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). The neural mechanisms of visual selection: the view from neuropsychology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 156-181.
15. Rizzo, M., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Psychoanatomical substrates of Balint's syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 72, 162-178.
16. Rock, I., & Palmer, S. E. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Scientific American, 262, 84-90.
17. Rubin, E. (1915). Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Denmark: Gyldenalske Boghandel.
18. Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the binding hypothesis. Neuron, 24, 67-77.
19. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1-46.
20. Sutherland, N. S. (1968). Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 171, 297-317.
21. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571-590.
22. Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411-443.
23. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
24. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
25. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92-114.
26. Von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: The modeler's perspective. Neuron, 24, 95-104.