Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 40-51

  Boddicker, N ^a   Gabler, N K ^a   Spurlock, M E ^a   Nettleton, D ^a   Dekkers, J C M ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feed efficiency; Pig; Residual feed intake; Selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; EATING; FOOD DEPRIVATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SWINE;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY WEIGHT; DIET; EATING; FOOD DEPRIVATION; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 78650972599     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3106     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AOAC. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC.
2. Barea, R., S. Dubois, H. Gilbert, P. Sellier, J. van Milgen, and J. Noblet. 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 88:2062-2072.
3. Boddicker, N., D. Nettleton, M. Spurlock, N. K. Gabler, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2010. Estimated energy utilization and maintenance energy requirements in pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. Proc. 9th World Congr. Genet. Applied Livest. Prod. Leipzig, Germany. Abstr. 584.
4. Cai, W., D. S. Casey, and J. C. Dekkers. 2008. Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. J. Anim. Sci. 86:287-298.
5. Cai, W., H. Wu, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2010. Longitudinal analysis of body weight and feed intake in selection lines for residual feed intake in pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. In press.
6. Cleveland, E. R., R. K. Johnson, R. W. Mandigo, and E. R. Peo Jr. 1983. Index selection and feed intake restriction in swine. 2. Effect on energy utilization. J. Anim. Sci. 56:570-578.
7. Eggert, D. L., and M. K. Nielsen. 2006. Comparison of feed energy costs of maintenance, lean deposition, and fat deposition in three lines of mice selected for heat loss. J. Anim. Sci. 84:276-282.
8. Ewan, R. C. 2001. Energy utilization in swine nutrition. Pages 85-94 in Swine Nutrition. A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern, ed. CRC Press, New York, NY.
9. Gilbert, H., J. P. Bidanel, J. Gruand, J. C. Caritez, Y. Billon, P. Guillouet, H. Lagant, J. Noblet, and P. Sellier. 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3182-3188.
10. Herd, R. M., and P. F. Arthur. 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 87(E. Suppl.):E64-E71.
11. Herd, R. M., and S. C. Bishop. 2000. Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 63:111-119.
12. Hoque, M. A., H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata, T. Oikawa, and K. Suzuki. 2009. Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livest. Sci. 121:45-49.
13. Johnson, Z. B., J. J. Chewning, and R. A. Nugent 3rd. 1999. Genetic parameters for production traits and measures of residual feed intake in Large White swine. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1679-1685.
14. Kim, K. S., N. Larsen, T. Short, G. Plastow, and M. F. Rothschild. 2000. A missense variant of the porcine melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene is associated with fatness, growth, and feed intake traits. Mamm. Genome 11:131-135.
15. Koch, R. M., L. A. Swinger, D. Chambers, and K. E. Gregory. 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 22:486-494.
16. Luiting, P. 1990. Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying hens: Causes of variation in residual feed consumption. World's Poult. Sci. J. 46:133-152.
17. McDonald, J. M., J. J. Ramsey, J. L. Miner, and M. K. Nielsen. 2009. Differences in mitochondrial efficiency between lines of mice divergently selected for heat loss. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3105-3113.
18. Nguyen, N. H., C. P. McPhee, and C. M. Wade. 2005. Responses in residual feed intake in lines of Large White pigs selected for growth rate on restricted feeding (measured on ad libitum individual feeding). J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 122:264-270.
19. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
20. Oresanya, T. F., A. D. Beaulieu, and J. F. Patience. 2008. Investigations of energy metabolism in weanling barrows: The interaction of dietary energy concentration and daily feed (energy) intake. J. Anim. Sci. 86:348-363.
21. Richardson, E. C., and R. M. Herd. 2004. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 44:431-440.
22. Richardson, E. C., R. M. Herd, V. H. Oddy, J. M. Thompson, J. A. Archer, and P. F. Arthur. 2001. Body composition and implications for heat production of Angus steer progeny of parents selected for and against residual feed intake. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 41:1065-1072.
23. Wiseman, T. G., D. C. Mahan, J. C. Peters, N. D. Fastinger, S. Ching, and Y. Y. Kim. 2007. Tissue weights and body composition of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1825-1835.