A multilevel multitrait-multimethod analysis of self- and peer-reported daily affective experiences

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 398-408

  Bleidorn, Wiebke ^a   Peters, Anna Lena ^a,b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Bielefelder Institut fur Psychologische Psychotherapieausbildung   (Germany)

Author keywords

Daily assessments; Experience sampling method; MTMM; Multilevel modelling; PANAS; Peer reports

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053120346     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.804     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Baker, L. A., Cesa, I. L., Gatz, M., & Mellins, C. (1992). Genetic and environmental influences on Positive and Negative Affect: Support for a two-factor theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 158-163.
2. Bleidorn, W. (2009). Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality, 23, 509-530. DOI: 10.1002/per.731.
3. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616. DOI: 0.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030.
4. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
5. Conner, T., Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Tennen, H. (2007). Idiographic personality: The theory and practice of experience sampling. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 79-96). New York: NY: Guilford Press.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.
7. Denissen, J. J. A., Penke, L., Butalid, L., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2008). The effects of weather on daily mood: A multilevel approach. Emotion, 8, 662-667. DOI: 10.1037/a0013497.
8. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.
9. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.1011.
10. Flügel, J. C. (1925). A quantitative study of feeling and emotion in everyday life. British Journal of Psychology, 15, 318-355.
11. Funder, D. C. (1989). Accuracy in personality judgment and the dancing bear. In D. M. Buss, & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 210-223). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Furr, R. M. (2009). The study of behaviour in personality psychology: Meaning, importance and measurement. European Journal of Personality. 23, 437-453. DOI: 10.1002/per.726.
13. Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029-1041.
14. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
15. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Quantitative methodology series. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Hox, J. J., Maas, C. J. M., & Brinkhuis, M. J. S. (2010). The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Neerlandica, 64, 157-170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00445.x.
17. Ilies, R., Dimotakis, N., & Watson, D. (2010). Mood, blood pressure, and heart rate at work: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 120-130. DOI: 10.1037/a0018350.
18. Kaplan, S., Bradley, J. C., Luchman, J. N., & Haynes, D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 162-176. DOI: 10.1037/a0013115.
19. Kraan, H., Meertens, H., Hilwig, M., Volovics, L., Dijkman-Caes, C. I. M., & Portegijs, P. (1992). Selecting measures, diagnostic validity and scaling in the study of depression. In M. W. de Vries (Ed.), The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings (pp. 324-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der 'Positive and Negative Affect Schedule' (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the 'Positive and Negative Affect Schedule' (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
21. Laenen, A., Alonso, A., Molenberghs, G., & Vangeneugden, T. (2009). Reliability of a longitudinal sequence of scale ratings. Psychometrika, 74, 49-64. DOI: 10.1007/S11336-008-9079-7.
22. Laenen, A., Vangeneugden, T., Geys, H., & Molenberghs, G. (2006). Generalized reliability estimation using repeated measurements. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 113-131. DOI: 10.1348/000711005X66068.
23. Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (2002). Emotion: Models, measures, and individual differences. In R. Lord, R. Klimoski, & R. Kanfer (Eds.), Emotions at work (pp. 64-106). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Larson, R. W., Moneta, G., Richards, M. H., & Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development, 73, 1151-1165. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00464.
25. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
26. Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 171-193. DOI: 10.1348/096317905X40105.
27. Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376-398.
28. Nezlek, J. B. (2007). A multilevel framework for understanding relationships among traits, states, situations and behaviours. European Journal of Personality, 21, 789-810. DOI: 10.1002/per.640.
29. Nezlek, J. B., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Depression as a moderator of relationships between positive daily events and day-to-day psychological adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1692-1704. DOI: 10.1177/01461672012712012.
30. Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355. DOI: 10.1037//1082-989X.5.3.343.
31. Rafaeli, E., & Revelle, W. (2006). A premature consensus: Are happiness and sadness truly opposite affects? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 1-2, DOI: 10.1007/s11031-006-9004-2.
32. Rafaeli, E., Rogers, G. M., & Revelle, W. (2007). Affective synchrony: Individual differences in mixed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 915-932. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207301009.
33. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM (Version 6). Chicago, IL: Scientific Software (Computer software).
35. Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Kang, S. J. (1991). A multilevel, multivariate model for studying school climate with estimation via the EM algorithm and application to U.S. high-school data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 16, 295-330. DOI: 10.3102/10769986016004295.
36. Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.
38. Schimmack, U. (2001). Pleasure, displeasure, and mixed feelings? Are semantic opposites mutually exclusive? Cognition and Emotion, 15, 81-97. DOI: 10.1080/0269993004200123.
39. Schmuckle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Burns, L. R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 463-475. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00007-7.
40. Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relation between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 27-52. DOI: 10.1080/02699930441000076.
41. Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5-34. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023605205115.
42. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin.
43. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
44. Shrout, P. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1995). Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
45. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107-120. DOI: 10.1007/S11336-008-9101-0.
46. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
47. Steyer, R., Schwenkmezger, P., Notz, P., & Eid, M. (1997). Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) [The Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire (MMQ)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
48. Vansteelandt, K., van Mechelen, I., & Nezlek, J. B. (2005). The co-occurrence of emotions in daily life: A multilevel approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 325-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.05.006.
49. Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford Press.
50. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1991). Self- versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 927-940.
51. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
52. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
53. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect: Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601-610.
54. Watson, D., & Vaidya, J. (2003). Mood measurement: Current status and future directions. In J. A. Schinka, & W. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology Vol. 2 Research methods (pp. 351-375). New York: Wiley.
55. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820-838.
56. Wilhelm, P., & Schoebi, D. (2007). Assessing mood in daily life: Structural validity, sensitivity to change, and reliability of a short-scale to measure three basic dimensions of mood. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 258-267. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.258.
57. Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität [Interrater agreement and interrater reliability]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
58. Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2000). The distributions of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 178-197. DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2275.